Dergiler / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Simulation-Based Optimization of the Sea Trial on Ships

Sayfa
274–285
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the new simulation model, total time spent to complete the tests were 25,3567 hours, so the testing time was shortened by 2.75 (9,76%) hours.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:As well known, ships which have complex production processes are subject to various tests made on every stage in many fields from the beginning to the end of the production.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result, it was determined that the total cruising time was 28,0989 hours.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the new simulation model, total time spent to complete the tests were 25,3567 hours, so the testing time was shortened by 2.75 (9,76%) hours.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

As well known, ships which have complex production processes are subject to various tests made on every stage in many fields from the beginning to the end of the production. After the tests are completed successfully, the ship is delivered to the ship-owner. “Sea trial” being the last stage of these tests, is examined in detail in this study. The purpose of this study is to plan the tests performed in the sea trial by the means of computer programs and to suggest shorter completion period for the tests.Thus, reducing the total cost ofthe cruising. Moreover, shortening the duration ofthe cruise will be a factor that can speed up the delivery ofthe ship. For this purpose, the tests and processes performed during the sea trial are listed. A cruise process flow diagram including all the tests applied under normal conditions was created, and the data were entered into the SIMIO simulation program. As a result, it was determined that the total cruising time was 28,0989 hours. After that, a new flow diagram was created by making some improvements in the current testing process, and a new simulation model was built up. In the new simulation model, total time spent to complete the tests were 25,3567 hours, so the testing time was shortened by 2.75 (9,76%) hours.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GENÇ, Y., ÖZKÖK, M. (2020). Simulation-Based Optimization of the Sea Trial on Ships. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 274–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/213238

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Fisher, K., W. (2003). Shipbuilding Contracts and Specifications, Chapter 9 of Ship Design and Construction. Society of Naval Architect and Marine Engineers, Jersey City, USA
  2. Abdel-latif, S., Abdel-geliel, M. and Zakzouk, E., E. (2013). Simulation of Ship Maneuvering Behavior Based on the Modular Mathematical Model. 21st Mediterranean Conferance on Control& Automation, June, Crete, Greece, 94-99
  3. IMO Circular MSC/Circ. (2002). Explanatory Notes to the Standards for Ship Manoeuvrability. International Maritime Organization, 1053
  4. Ponsignon, T. and Mönch, L. (2010). Architecture for Simulation-Based Performance Assement of Planning Approaches in Semiconductor Manufacturing. Winter Simulation Conference, December, Baltimore, MD, USA, 3341-3349
  5. Medeiros, D., J., Traband, M., Tribble, A., Lepro, R., Fast, K. and Williams, D. (2000). Simulation Based Design for a Shipyard Manufacturing Process. Winter Simulation Conferance, December, Baltimore, MD,USA, 1411-1414
  6. Caprace, J., D., Silva, C., T., D., Rigo, P. and Pires, F., C., M. (2011). Discrete Event Production Simülation and Optimisation of Ship Block Erection Process. 10th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries, May, Berlin, Germany, 271-282
  7. Roh, M., I. and Lee, K., Y. (2007). Generation of Production Material Information for a Building Block and Simulation of Block Erection for Process Planning and Scheduling in Shipbuilding. International Journal of Production Research, 45(20), 4653-4683
  8. Yuguang, Z. (2012). Optimization of Block Erection Scheduling Based on a Petri Net and Discrete PSO. International Journal of Production Research, 50(20), 5926-5935
  9. Lamb, T.,Chung, H., Spicknall, N., Shin, J., G., Woo, J., H. and Koenig, P. (2006). Simulation-Based Performance Improvement for Shipbuilding Processes, Journal of Ship Production, 22(2), 49-65
  10. Cheng, F. and Hongxiang, R. (2015). The Evaluating Simulation System of Ship Anchoring Operation. 34th Chinese Control Conference, July, Hangzhou, China, 8834-8837
  11. Cha, J., H., Roh, M., I. and Lee, K., Y. (2010). Integrated Simulation Framework for the Process Planning of Ships and Offshore Structures. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26, 430-453
  12. Nam, J., H., Lee, J., H. and Woo, J., H. (2016). Construction of Standardized Data Structure for Simulation of Shipbuilding Process. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing,