Dergiler / Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Evde Eğitim Uygulaması Üzerine Bir Durum Çalışması: Evde Fen Eğitimi

A Case Study on Homeschooling Application: Home Science Education

Sayfa
139–173
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de yürütülen “Evde Fen Eğitimi” uygulamasına örnek bir

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de yürütülen “Evde Fen Eğitimi” uygulamasına örnek bir
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de yürütülen “Evde Fen Eğitimi” uygulamasına örnek bir
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de yürütülen “Evde Fen Eğitimi” uygulamasına örnek bir
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Evde Eğitim · Evde Fen Eğitimi · Durum Çalışması

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de yürütülen “Evde Fen Eğitimi” uygulamasına örnek bir

Abstract

In this study, a sample case of "Home Science Education" in Turkey was examined.The aim of this study is to obtain information on how the implementation is carriedout and what the positive aspects and difficulties of the implementation can be, byexamining a sample case of "Home Science Education" application which has beenimplemented in Turkey since 2010.Participants of the study conducted in the form of a case study in 2011-2012academic year are the girl student who is carried out "Home Science Education", theparent of this student and her science teacher. The data was obtained by documentreview, semi-structured interviews and video recordings. The data obtained at theend of the semi-structured interviews were analyzed by descriptive analysis andcourse records were analyzed by content analysis.At the end of the study, it was determined that the students who could not continueto study due to health problems in Turkey could benefit from "Home Education"during the course hours determined by the special education board. It was observedthat the teacher used different teaching methods and that the student was morepassive in the process. It has been seen that the student has no chance of exchangingideas with his peers and has difficulty understanding some subjects during theimplementation process. It has been determined that the application has a positiveeffect on the cognitive and affective development of the learners and is insufficientin terms of social development. The data obtained as a result of the study are sourcesof science education at home in Turkey for both Turkey and other countries

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PEKER, E. A., TAŞ, E. (2017). Evde Eğitim Uygulaması Üzerine Bir Durum Çalışması: Evde Fen Eğitimi. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 139–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/197757

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Apple, M. (2000). The cultural politics of home schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(2), 256-271.
  2. Aydın, İ.P. ve Pehlivan, Z. (2000). Ev okulu uygulaması: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri örneği HomeSchooling. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 33:1-2.
  3. Bachman, J. (2011). STEM Learning Activity among Home-Educating Families. PhD Dissertation (Unplublished). Oregon State University. Basham, P., Merrified, J., ve Hepburn, Claudia R. (2007). Home schooling: From the extreme to mainstream. Study in Education Policy. Occasional Paper. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute. Brabant, C., Bourdon, S. ve Jutras, F. (2003): Home Education in Quebec: Family First, Evaluation &Research in Education, 17:2-3, 112-131.
  4. Braınerd, L. W., Sobanskı, J. ve Wınegardner, R. (2002) Basic Skills for homeschooling. New York: Learning Express. Online kaynak: 01.04.2017 tarihinde https://pendidikanmatematikausn.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/learningexpress_edito rs_basic_skills_for_homeschbookfi-org.pdf adresinden indirilmiştir. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri(Yedinci Baskı).Ankara:
  5. Pegem Yayınları.
  6. Carper, J.C. (2000). “Pluralism to establishment to dissent: The religious and educational context of home schooling.” Peabody Journal of Education, 75 (1/2), 8- 19. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Üçüncü baskı) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Collom, E. (2005). “The ins and outs of homeschooling: the determinants of parental motivations and student achievement.” Education and Urban Society, 37, 307-335. Ebinezar John A/L Y. Rajamony. (2008). The Malaysian experience in home schooling. PhD Dissertation (Unplublished), University Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. English, R. M. (2013). The most private private education: home education in Australia. Homeschool Researcher, 29(4), 1-7.
  7. Ensign, J. (2000). “Defying the stereotypes of special education: home school students.” Peabody Journal of Education, 75 (1/2), 147-158.
  8. Ertürk, S. (1998). Eğitimde "Program" Geliştirme, Ankara:
  9. Meteksan A.Ş. Harman, A., (2012). Education Systems. Erişim tarihi: 20.07.2014.
  10. Hill, P.T. (2000). “Home schooling and the future of public education”. Peabody Journal of Education, 75 (1/2), 20- 31. Jeub, C. (1994). “Why parents choose home schooling.” Educational Leadership, 52 (1), 50- 52. Knuth, Jessica D. (2010). A descriptive analysis of homeschooling children w