Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

A sample stacking-capillary electrophoresis method for simultaneous determination of nitrate and thiocyanate ions of ultra-heat-treated milk samples

Sayfa
1184–1190
Yayın Tarihi
2018-08-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The nitrate concentration in commercial UHT milk samples ranged between 0.20 and 1.50 mg/L (3.23-24.20 μμ\mu mol/L) and the thiocyanate ion concentration ranged between 0.41 and 0.67 mg/L (7.06-11.55 μμ\mu mol/L).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Ultra-heat-treated (UHT) cow milk is mostly consumed in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the present study, nitrate and thiocyanate contents of commercial UHT~whole cow milk were determined simultaneously by sample stacking-capillary electrophoresis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The nitrate concentration in commercial UHT milk samples ranged between 0.20 and 1.50 mg/L (3.23-24.20 μμ\mu mol/L) and the thiocyanate ion concentration ranged between 0.41 and 0.67 mg/L (7.06-11.55 μμ\mu mol/L).
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Capillary electrophoresis · milk · nitrate

Abstract

Ultra-heat-treated (UHT) cow milk is mostly consumed in Turkey. Heating milk can cause some chemical and biochemical changes that affect different components of milk. However, studies on the constituents of UHT milk are scare. In the present study, nitrate and thiocyanate contents of commercial UHT~whole cow milk were determined simultaneously by sample stacking-capillary electrophoresis. The best separation of nitrate and thiocyanate ions was performed by reducing the electroosmotic flow at pH 4.0 using 30 mM formic acid and 30 mM sodium sulfate containing separation electrolyte. Analysis was completed in less than 3 min. The limits of detection obtained at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 for nitrate and thiocyanate were 0.03 mg/L (0.48 μμ\mu mol/L) and 0.06 mg/L (1.03 μμ\mu mol/L), respectively. The nitrate concentration in commercial UHT milk samples ranged between 0.20 and 1.50 mg/L (3.23-24.20 μμ\mu mol/L) and the thiocyanate ion concentration ranged between 0.41 and 0.67 mg/L (7.06-11.55 μμ\mu mol/L).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TEZCAN, F. (2018). A sample stacking-capillary electrophoresis method for simultaneous determination of nitrate and thiocyanate ions of ultra-heat-treated milk samples. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 1184–1190. https://ajindex.com/articles/184394

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Stagnari, F.; Di Bitetto, V.; Pisante, M. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 114, 225-233.
  2. Indyk, H. E.; Woollard, D. C. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences; Academic Press:
  3. San Diego, CA, USA, 2011, pp. 906-991.
  4. Mitacek, E. J.; Brunnemann, K. D.; Suttajit, M.; Caplan, L. S.; Gagna, C. E.; Bhothisuwan, K.; Siriamornpun, S.; Hummel, C. F.; Ohshima, H.; Roy, R. et al. Nutr. Cancer 2008, 60, 196-203.
  5. Greer, F. R.; Shannon, M. Pediatrics 2005, 116, 784-786. WHO. Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information. Vol. 2; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
  6. Fonteh, F.; Grandison, A. A. S.; Lewis, M. J. J. Dairy Res. 2002, 69, 401-409. Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations. Guidelines for the Preservation of Raw Milk by Use of the Lactoperoxidase System; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1991.
  7. Green, W. L. In: Mechanisms of Action of Antithyroid Compounds; Werner, S. C.; Ingbar, S. H., Eds. Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  8. Blount, B. C.; Valentin-Blasini, L. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 567, 87-93.
  9. Connolly, D.; Barron, L.; Paull, B. J. Chromatogr. B 2002, 767, 175-180.
  10. Vitali, L.; Favere, V. T.; Micke, G. A. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 2327-2333.
  11. Nutku, M. S.; Erim, F. B. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1998, 21, 505-508.
  12. Bjergegaard, C.; Moller, P.; Sorensen, H. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 717, 409-414.
  13. Chanmandust, S.; Mehrasebi, M. R.; Kamali, K.; Solgi, R.; Taran, J.; Nazari, F.; Hosseini, M. J. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016, 19, 1983-1993.
  14. Yeh, T. S.; Liao, S. F.; Kuo, C. Y.; Hwang, W. J. Food Drug Anal. 2013, 21, 73-79.
  15. Yong, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D.; Liu, Z.; Abernethy, G. L. J. Food Chem. 2017, 215, 61-66.
  16. Kirk, A. B.; Dyke, J. V.; Martin, C. F.; Dasgupta, P. K. Environ. Health Persp. 2007, 115, 182-186.
  17. Öztekin, N.; Nutku, M. S.; Erim, F. B. Food Chem. 2002, 76, 103-106.
  18. Ferrer, E.; Alegria, A.; Courtoisi, G.; Farre, R. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 881, 599-606.
  19. Quirino, J. P.; Terabe, S. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 902, 119-135. Eurachem. The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods: A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics; Eurachem: Torino, Italy, 1998.
  20. Reis Lima, M. J.; Fernandes, S. M.V.; Ranges, A. O. S. Int. Dairy J. 2006, 16, 1442-1447.
  21. Kalaycioglu, Z.; Erim, F. B. Food Anal. Method. 2016, 9, 706-711.