Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

A sample stacking-capillary electrophoresis method for simultaneous determination of nitrate and thiocyanate ions of ultra-heat-treated milk samples

Pages
1184–1190
Publication Date
2018-08-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The nitrate concentration in commercial UHT milk samples ranged between 0.20 and 1.50 mg/L (3.23-24.20 μμ\mu mol/L) and the thiocyanate ion concentration ranged between 0.41 and 0.67 mg/L (7.06-11.55 μμ\mu mol/L).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ultra-heat-treated (UHT) cow milk is mostly consumed in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the present study, nitrate and thiocyanate contents of commercial UHT~whole cow milk were determined simultaneously by sample stacking-capillary electrophoresis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The nitrate concentration in commercial UHT milk samples ranged between 0.20 and 1.50 mg/L (3.23-24.20 μμ\mu mol/L) and the thiocyanate ion concentration ranged between 0.41 and 0.67 mg/L (7.06-11.55 μμ\mu mol/L).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Capillary electrophoresis · milk · nitrate

Abstract

Ultra-heat-treated (UHT) cow milk is mostly consumed in Turkey. Heating milk can cause some chemical and biochemical changes that affect different components of milk. However, studies on the constituents of UHT milk are scare. In the present study, nitrate and thiocyanate contents of commercial UHT~whole cow milk were determined simultaneously by sample stacking-capillary electrophoresis. The best separation of nitrate and thiocyanate ions was performed by reducing the electroosmotic flow at pH 4.0 using 30 mM formic acid and 30 mM sodium sulfate containing separation electrolyte. Analysis was completed in less than 3 min. The limits of detection obtained at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 for nitrate and thiocyanate were 0.03 mg/L (0.48 μμ\mu mol/L) and 0.06 mg/L (1.03 μμ\mu mol/L), respectively. The nitrate concentration in commercial UHT milk samples ranged between 0.20 and 1.50 mg/L (3.23-24.20 μμ\mu mol/L) and the thiocyanate ion concentration ranged between 0.41 and 0.67 mg/L (7.06-11.55 μμ\mu mol/L).

🔖

Cite This Article

TEZCAN, F. (2018). A sample stacking-capillary electrophoresis method for simultaneous determination of nitrate and thiocyanate ions of ultra-heat-treated milk samples. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 1184–1190. https://ajindex.com/articles/184394

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Stagnari, F.; Di Bitetto, V.; Pisante, M. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 114, 225-233.
  2. Indyk, H. E.; Woollard, D. C. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences; Academic Press:
  3. San Diego, CA, USA, 2011, pp. 906-991.
  4. Mitacek, E. J.; Brunnemann, K. D.; Suttajit, M.; Caplan, L. S.; Gagna, C. E.; Bhothisuwan, K.; Siriamornpun, S.; Hummel, C. F.; Ohshima, H.; Roy, R. et al. Nutr. Cancer 2008, 60, 196-203.
  5. Greer, F. R.; Shannon, M. Pediatrics 2005, 116, 784-786. WHO. Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information. Vol. 2; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
  6. Fonteh, F.; Grandison, A. A. S.; Lewis, M. J. J. Dairy Res. 2002, 69, 401-409. Food and Agriculture Organization for the United Nations. Guidelines for the Preservation of Raw Milk by Use of the Lactoperoxidase System; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1991.
  7. Green, W. L. In: Mechanisms of Action of Antithyroid Compounds; Werner, S. C.; Ingbar, S. H., Eds. Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  8. Blount, B. C.; Valentin-Blasini, L. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 567, 87-93.
  9. Connolly, D.; Barron, L.; Paull, B. J. Chromatogr. B 2002, 767, 175-180.
  10. Vitali, L.; Favere, V. T.; Micke, G. A. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 2327-2333.
  11. Nutku, M. S.; Erim, F. B. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1998, 21, 505-508.
  12. Bjergegaard, C.; Moller, P.; Sorensen, H. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 717, 409-414.
  13. Chanmandust, S.; Mehrasebi, M. R.; Kamali, K.; Solgi, R.; Taran, J.; Nazari, F.; Hosseini, M. J. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016, 19, 1983-1993.
  14. Yeh, T. S.; Liao, S. F.; Kuo, C. Y.; Hwang, W. J. Food Drug Anal. 2013, 21, 73-79.
  15. Yong, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, D.; Liu, Z.; Abernethy, G. L. J. Food Chem. 2017, 215, 61-66.
  16. Kirk, A. B.; Dyke, J. V.; Martin, C. F.; Dasgupta, P. K. Environ. Health Persp. 2007, 115, 182-186.
  17. Öztekin, N.; Nutku, M. S.; Erim, F. B. Food Chem. 2002, 76, 103-106.
  18. Ferrer, E.; Alegria, A.; Courtoisi, G.; Farre, R. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 881, 599-606.
  19. Quirino, J. P.; Terabe, S. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 902, 119-135. Eurachem. The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods: A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics; Eurachem: Torino, Italy, 1998.
  20. Reis Lima, M. J.; Fernandes, S. M.V.; Ranges, A. O. S. Int. Dairy J. 2006, 16, 1442-1447.
  21. Kalaycioglu, Z.; Erim, F. B. Food Anal. Method. 2016, 9, 706-711.