KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eskiz: Şehir ve Bölge PLanlama Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 07 Sayı: 02

Mimarlık ve Planlamada Yaya Hareketi: 1962–2025 Bibliyometrik İnceleme

Pedestrian Movement in Architecture and Planning: 1962–2025 Bibliometric Review

Aslıhan Çetin Coşkun(İSTANBUL KÜLTÜR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7176-6394
Önder Coşkun(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8945-9242
Sayfa
84–115
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, mimarlık, şehir planlama, halk sağlığı ve bilişim gibi alanlarda disiplinlerarasılığın artmasıyla birlikte yaya hareketi çalışmalarında zaman içinde önemli bir artış olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, yaya hareketleri üzerine yapılan akademik araştırmalardaki tarihsel evrimi, mevcut durumu ve ortaya çıkan eğilimleri kapsamlı bir bibliyometrik analiz yoluyla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Kentsel dinamiklerin temel bir bileşeni olan yaya hareketleri, özellikle 1960'lardan bu yana araç odaklı şehir tasarımına yönelik eleştirilere yanıt olarak, sürdürülebilir şehir planlamasının merkezi bir odak noktası haline gelmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, mimarlık, şehir planlama, halk sağlığı ve bilişim gibi alanlarda disiplinlerarasılığın artmasıyla birlikte yaya hareketi çalışmalarında zaman içinde önemli bir artış olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2025 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:yaya hareketi · bibliyometrik analiz · performans analizi

Özet

Bu çalışma, yaya hareketleri üzerine yapılan akademik araştırmalardaki tarihsel evrimi, mevcut durumu ve ortaya çıkan eğilimleri kapsamlı bir bibliyometrik analiz yoluyla incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Kentsel dinamiklerin temel bir bileşeni olan yaya hareketleri, özellikle 1960'lardan bu yana araç odaklı şehir tasarımına yönelik eleştirilere yanıt olarak, sürdürülebilir şehir planlamasının merkezi bir odak noktası haline gelmiştir. Araştırma, 1962'den 2025'e kadar Web of Science ve Scopus veri tabanlarından alınan 829 akademik yayını analiz etmektedir. Bu yayınlar arasında başlıklarında, özetlerinde veya anahtar kelimelerinde "yaya hareketi"nden bahseden dergi makaleleri, bildiriler, kitap bölümleri ve incelemeler yer almaktadır. Veriler, VOS Viewer yazılımı kullanılarak yayın eğilimleri, etkili yazarlar, iş birliği ağları, temel kavramlar ve atıf performansı açısından analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, mimarlık, şehir planlama, halk sağlığı ve bilişim gibi alanlarda disiplinlerarasılığın artmasıyla birlikte yaya hareketi çalışmalarında zaman içinde önemli bir artış olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Belirlenen ana araştırma temaları arasında yürünebilirlik, erişilebilirlik, güvenlik, kentsel morfoloji, çevresel algı ve dijital modelleme yer almaktadır. Çalışma ayrıca, veri odaklı yöntemlerin ve uluslararası akademik iş birliklerinin artan önemini vurgulamaktadır. Yaya güvenliği veya tahliye gibi belirli konulara odaklanan mevcut incelemelere rağmen, bu araştırma yaya hareketi alanına geniş ölçekli bir bibliyometrik genel bakış sunarak kritik bir boşluğu doldurmaktadır. Ayrıca, literatürdeki gözlemlenen eğilimlere ve boşluklara dayanarak gelecekteki araştırma yönleri de önermektedir. Genel olarak bu çalışma, kentsel tasarıma daha insan merkezli bir yaklaşım geliştirmeyi ve yaya dinamikleri üzerine gelecekteki araştırmalara rehberlik etmeyi amaçlayan akademisyenler, kentsel politika yapıcılar ve planlamacılar için değerli bir referans sunmaktadır.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the evolution of academic research on pedestrian movements over time and to This study aims to examine the historical evolution, current status, and emerging trends in academic research on pedestrian movements through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Pedestrian movements, as a fundamental component of urban dynamics, have become a central focus in sustainable urban planning, particularly in response to critiques of car-oriented city design since the 1960s. The research analyzes 829 academic publications from 1962 to 2025, retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus databases, including journal articles, proceedings, book chapters, and reviews that mention "pedestrian movement" in their titles, abstracts, or keywords. Using VOS Viewer software, the data were analyzed in terms of publication trends, influential authors, collaborative networks, key concepts, and citation performance. The findings reveal a significant increase in pedestrian movement studies over time, with growing interdisciplinarity across fields such as architecture, urban planning, public health, and informatics. Major research themes identified include walkability, accessibility, safety, urban morphology, environmental perception, and digital modeling. Furthermore, the study highlights the rising importance of data-driven methods and international academic collaborations. Despite existing reviews focusing on specific topics like pedestrian safety or evacuation, this research fills a critical gap by offering the large-scale bibliometric overview of the pedestrian movement field. It also proposes future research directions based on observed trends and gaps in the literature. Overall, this study provides a valuable reference for scholars, urban policymakers, and planners, aiming to foster a more human-centered approach to urban design and to guide future investigations on pedestrian movements.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Coşkun, A. Ç., Coşkun, Ö. (2025). Mimarlık ve Planlamada Yaya Hareketi: 1962–2025 Bibliyometrik İnceleme. Eskiz: Şehir ve Bölge PLanlama Dergisi, Cilt: 07 Sayı: 02, 84–115. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18095534

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (103)

  1. Abd Aziz, F. S., Abdullah, K. H., Harith, S. H., & Sofyan, D. (2022). Trends and evolution of road user behaviour research: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 20(3), 69-93. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20088302.2022.20.3.5.2
  2. Alam, M. J., Habib, N., Holmes, D., & Habib, M. A. (2022). Pedestrian movement modelling for a commercial street considering COVID-19 social distancing strategies. Procedia Computer Science, 201, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.03.011
  3. Al-Azzawi, M., & Raeside, R. (2007). Modeling Pedestrian Walking Speeds on Sidewalks. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 133(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2007)133:3(211)
  4. Andresen, E., Zinke, R., Hofinger, G., Chraibi, M., & Seyfried, A. (2016). The impact of perception and wayfinding on pedestrian movements. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (PED2016).
  5. Angel, A., Cohen, A., Dalyot, S., & Plaut, P. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 policies on pedestrian traffic and walking patterns. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(5), 1178–1193. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221113332
  6. Angel, M. L., Sando, T., Chimba, D., & Kwigizile, V. (2014). Effects of rain on traffic operations on Florida freeways. Transportation Research Record, 2440(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.3141/2440-07
  7. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  8. Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença Jr, D., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 110(3), 392. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
  9. Aziminezhad, M., & Taherkhani, R. (2023). BIM for deconstruction: A review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 73, 106683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106683
  10. Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2021). Forty years of the Journal of Futures Markets: A bibliometric overview. Journal of Futures Markets, 41(7), 1027–1054. https://doi.org/10.1002/FUT.22211
  11. Bales, M. E., Wright, D. N., Oxley, P. R., & Wheeler, T. R. (2020). Bibliometric visualization and analysis software: State of the art, workflows, and best practices. https://doi.org/https://hdl.handle.net/1813/69597
  12. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 361–362). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
  13. Batty, M. (2013a). A theory of city size. Science, 3(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820613513390
  14. Batty, M. (2013b). The new science of cities. MIT press.
  15. Bhowmick, D., Winter, S., Stevenson, M., & Vortisch, P. (2020). The impact of urban road network morphology on pedestrian wayfinding behavior. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 21, 203–228. https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2020.21.601
  16. Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., Amodu, O. A., & Mahmood, R. A. R. (2023). A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX, 11, 102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339
  17. Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
  18. Burton, B., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2020). Twenty-five years of The European Journal of Finance (EJF): a retrospective analysis. The European Journal of Finance, 26(18), 1817–1841. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1754873
  19. Büyüktaş, Ö., & Demirkol, H. G. (2024, December). Bibliometric Analysis of the Concept of Walkability. In 6th International Symposium on Innovation in Architecture, Planning and Design Proceedings, Vol. 20 (pp. 182-186). SETSCI-Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.36287/setsci.20.23.182
  20. Calthorpe, P. (1990). Design guidelines. Final Public Review Draft for Sacramento County Planning Community Development Department.
  21. Castelli, L., Corazzini, L. L., & Geminiani, G. C. (2008). Spatial navigation in large-scale virtual environments: Gender differences in survey tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1643–1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.005
  22. Cerioli, A., Caselli, B., Marinelli, L. J., Vezzani, A., & Burioni, R. (2025). Pedestrian fluxes in confined geometric networks: entropic measures and robustness of accessibility in a university campus. Physics and Society, Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07720
  23. Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
  24. Çetin, A., Çelik, E., & Beyhan, Ş. G. (2020). Kentsel ızgara formunun kullanıcı hareketlerine etkisinin mekân dizim yöntemi ile incelenmesi Isparta kafeler caddesi örneği. İdealkent, 11(31). https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.713447
  25. Chainey, S., & Desyllas, J. (2010). Modelling pedestrian movement to measure on-street crime risk. In M. Wachowicz (Ed.), Movement-Aware Applications for Sustainable Mobility: Technologies and Approaches (pp. 243–263), IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-769-5.ch015
  26. Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
  27. Choi, J., McKillop, E., Ward, M., & L’Hirondelle, N. (2006). Sex-specific relationships between route-learning strategies and abilities in a large-scale environment. Environment and Behavior, 38(6), 791–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506287004
  28. Chraibi, M., Feliciani, C., Haghani, M., Jia, X., & Ma, J. (2025). Walk the Line: The role of gender and culture on the movement patterns of pedestrians based on a multicultural study. Safety Science, 183, 106710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106710
  29. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.00
  30. Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016). Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics, 108(2), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-016-1948-8
  31. Cui, J., Allan, A., Taylor, M. A., & Lin, D. (2012). The perception of accessibility and ease of orientation of underground pedestrian systems: a survey in Shanghai. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 16(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2012.743744
  32. De Certeau, M. (1988). “Railway Navigation and Incarceration”: From the practice of everyday life. In I. Borden, T. Hall, & M. Miles (eds.), The City Cultures Reader (pp. 266-268). Routledge.
  33. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  34. Elzeni, M. M., ELMokadem, A. A., & Badawy, N. M. (2022). Impact of urban morphology on pedestrians: A review of urban approaches. Cities, 129, 103840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103840
  35. Fan, P. Y., Chun, K. P., Mijic, A., Tan, M. L., Liu, M. S., & Yetemen, O. (2022). A framework to evaluate the accessibility, visibility, and intelligibility of green-blue spaces (GBSs) related to pedestrian movement. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 69, 127494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127494
  36. Fang, C., Homma, R., & Qiu, T. (2024). A bibliometrics analysis related to the built environment and walking. Sustainability, 16(7), 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072850
  37. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama, 295(1), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90
  38. Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings. Island Press.
  39. Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Island Press.
  40. Guida, C., Carpentieri, G. & Masoumi, H. (2022). Measuring spatial accessibility to urban services for older adults: an application to healthcare facilities in Milan. European Transport Research Review, 4, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00544-3
  41. Haklay, M., O’Sullivan, D., Thurstain-Goodwin, M., & Schelhorn, T. (2001). “So go downtown”:simulating pedestrian movement in town centres. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1068/B2758T
  42. Han, R., Zhou, B., Huang, Y., Lu, X., Li, S., & Li, N. (2020). Bibliometric overview of research trends on heavy metal health risks and impacts in 1989–2018. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 123249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123249
  43. Helbing, D., & Molnár, P. (1995). Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E, 51(5), 4282–4286. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVE.51.4282
  44. Helbing, D., & Molnár, P. (2001). Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Physical Review E, 51(5), 4282. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2697
  45. Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press.
  46. Hillier, B. (2015). Space ıs the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
  47. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.
  48. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/B200029
  49. Hollmann, C. (2015). A cognitive human behaviour model for pedestrian behaviour simulation [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Greenwich.
  50. Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2005). Pedestrian travel behavior modeling. Networks and Spatial Economics, 5(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11067-005-2629-Y
  51. Hosseini, M. R., Maghrebi, M., Akbarnezhad, A., Martek, I., & Arashpour, M. (. (2018). Analysis of citation networks in building information modeling research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(8). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001492
  52. Humberto, M., Laboissière, R., Giannotti, M., Marte, C. L., Cruz, D. A., & Primon, H. (2019). Walking and walkability: do built environment measures correspond with pedestrian activity? Ambiente Construído, 19, 23–36. https://www.scielo.br/j/ac/a/WTHrNbM7HjYNc5wSLFbdScv/
  53. İnce, E. C. (2025). Mapping the path to sustainable urban mobility: a bibliometric analysis of global trends and innovations in transportation research. Sustainability, 17(4), 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041480
  54. Ishrath, N., & Rajendran, B. G. (2024). Exploring trends and patterns in traffic safety culture of pedestrians: a bibliometric analysis. SN Social Sciences, 4(10), 186. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43545-024-00981-Y
  55. Jacobs, J. (1961). “The Uses of City Neighborhoods”: From The Death and Life of Great American Cities. In J. Lin, & C. Mele (eds.), The Urban Sociology Reader (pp. 50–57). Routledge.
  56. Kaminka, G. A., & Fridman, N. (2018). Simulating urban pedestrian crowds of different cultures. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 9(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3102302
  57. Kapoor, S. S., Brar, T. S., & Kaur, J. (2023). Decision Support System for Measuring Pedestrian Accessibility to Public Transit Nodes. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 149(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4516
  58. Khan, Z. (2021). Human spatial behavior and microclimates in urban public spaces using agent-based simulation modeling. Prometheus, 5, 62-67. https://prometheus.library.iit.edu/index.php/journal/article/view/25
  59. Klarin, A. (2024). How to conduct a bibliometric content analysis: Guidelines and contributions of content co‐occurrence or co‐word literature reviews. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13031
  60. Kumar, A., & Mohindra, R. (2015). Bibliometric analysis on knowledge management research. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 5(2), 106–113.
  61. Kumari, P., & Mohanty, R. N. (2025). Bridging the gap: a bibliometric examination of the interdependency between pedestrian activity and built environment. Cities & Health, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2025.2544099
  62. Lee, S., Y. C., & Seo, K. W. (2020). Determinant factors of pedestrian volume in different land-use zones: Combining space syntax metrics with GIS-based built-environment measures. Sustainability, 12(20), 8647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208647
  63. Li, Y., & Fernie, G. (2010). Pedestrian behavior and safety on a two-stage crossing with a center refuge island and the effect of winter weather on pedestrian compliance rate. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(4), 1156-1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.01.004
  64. Lo, R. H. (2009). Walkability: what is it? Journal of Urbanism, 2(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170903092867
  65. Lopez Baeza, J., Carpio-Pinedo, J., Sievert, J., Landwehr, A., Preuner, P., Borgmann, K., & Noennig, J. R. (2021). Modeling pedestrian flows: Agent-based simulations of pedestrian activity for land use distributions in urban developments. Sustainability, 13(16), 9268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169268
  66. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2012). Safe on the move: The importance of the built environment. The Urban Fabric of Crime and Fear, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4210-9_4
  67. Lynch, K. (1964). The Image of the City. MIT Press.
  68. Ma, W., Alimo, P. K., Wang, L., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2022). Mapping pedestrian safety studies between 2010 and 2021: A scientometric analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 174, 106744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106744
  69. Mehta, V. (2008). Walkable streets: pedestrian behavior, perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Urbanism, 1(3), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170802529480
  70. Mirhashemi, A., Amirifar, S., Kashani, A. T., & Zou, X. (2022). Macro-level literature analysis on pedestrian safety: Bibliometric overview, conceptual frames, and trends. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 174, 106720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106720
  71. Niger, M. (2023). Analyzing Accessibility of Public Open Space in Relation to Urban Configuration of Dhaka City. Journal of Research in Infrastructure Designing, 6(2), 7–19. http://hbrppublication.com/OJS/index.php/JRID/article/view/3727
  72. Ozbil, A., Peponis, J., & Stone, B. (2011). Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Design International, 16(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1057/UDI.2011.2
  73. Park, Y., & Garcia, M. (2020). Pedestrian safety perception and urban street settings. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(11), 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1641577
  74. Paul, D., Moridpour, S., & Nguyen, L. A. (2023). Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on the Behaviour of Pedestrians. Sustainability, 15(3), 1874. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031874
  75. Penn, A. (2003). Space syntax and spatial cognition: or why the axial line? Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 30–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238864
  76. Peponis, J., Ross, C., & Rashid, M. (1997a). The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: The case of Atlanta. Geoforum, 28(3–4), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(97)00016-X
  77. Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Rashid, M., Hong Kim, S., & Bafna, S. (1997b). On the description of shape and spatial configuration inside buildings: Convex partitions and their local properties. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(5), 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1068/B240761
  78. Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. W. Schneider (eds.), Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday (pp. 9–24). International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
  79. Pushkarev, B. (1975). Urban space for pedestrians. The MIT Press.
  80. Ratti, C. (2005). The Lineage of the Line: Space Syntax Parameters from the Analysis of Urban DEMs. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(4), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1068/b31045
  81. Rossetti, S., Tiboni, M., Vetturi, D., Zazzi, M., & Caselli, B. (2020). Measuring pedestrian accessibility to public transport in urban areas: A GIS-based discretisation approach. European Transport/Trasporti Europei, 76, 2.
  82. Sadeghi, O., & Serugendo, G. (2024). Assessing Walkability in Urban Environments: A Comprehensive Overview. Preprints, 2024120689. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202412.0689.v1
  83. Seyfried, A., Steffen, B., Klingsch, W., & Boltes, M. (2005). The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2005(10), 10002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2005/10/P10002
  84. Sharmin, S., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2018). Meta-analysis of the relationships between space syntax measures and pedestrian movement. Transport Reviews, 38(4), 524–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1365101
  85. Song, J., Zhang, W., & Zeng, J. (2013). Research on pedestrian movement mechanism during pedestrian-vehicle crashes based on MADYMO. In ICTIS 2013: Improving Multimodal Transportation Systems-Information, Safety, and Integration (pp. 1604–1611). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413036.214
  86. Stoker, P., Garfinkel-Castro, A., Khayesi, M., Odero, W., Mwangi, M. N., Peden, M., & Ewing, R. (2015). Pedestrian safety and the built environment: a review of the risk factors. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595438
  87. Subaih, R., Maree, M., Chraibi, M., Awad, S., & Zanoon, T. (2020). Experimental investigation on the alleged gender-differences in pedestrian dynamics: A study reveals no gender differences in pedestrian movement behavior. IEEE Access, 8, 33748–33757. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973917
  88. Talpur, M. A. H., Khahro, S. H., Abro, S., & Shaikh, H. (2024). Measuring GIS-based pedestrian accessibility to bus stops: a sustainable approach to ease urban traffic problems at Hyderabad, Pakistan. Discover Cities, 1(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-024-00031-5
  89. Tang, B. S., Wong, K. K., Tang, K. S., & Wai Wong, S. (2021). Walking accessibility to neighbourhood open space in a multi-level urban environment of Hong Kong. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(5), 1340–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320932575
  90. Turner, A. (2003). Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(5), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1068/B12962
  91. Turner, A. (2005). Could a road-centre line be an axial line in disguise. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Space Syntax (pp. 145–159).
  92. Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1068/B2684
  93. Turner, A., Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (2005). An algorithmic definition of the axial map. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(3), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1068/B31097
  94. Turner, B. (2006). The Cambridge dictionary of sociology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316135334
  95. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
  96. Vanumu, L. D., Ramachandra Rao, K., &, & Tiwari, G. (2017). Fundamental diagrams of pedestrian flow characteristics: A review. European Transport Research Review, 9(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0264-6
  97. Whyte, W. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces, INC.
  98. Wong, D. (2018). VOSviewer. Technical Services Quarterly, 35(2), 219–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2018.1425352
  99. Wu, L. W., & Guo, S. J. (2014). An application of space syntax to critical working space Analysis: The case of building construction. Journal of Marine Science and Technology (Taiwan), 22(5). https://doi.org/10.6119/JMST-013-0716-3
  100. Xu, Z., & Yu, D. (2019). A Bibliometrics analysis on big data research (2009–2018). Journal of Data, Information and Management, 1(1–2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42488-019-00001-2
  101. Yu, Y. C. (2015). Built environmental designs in promoting pedestrian safety. Sustainability, 7(7), 9444-9460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7079444
  102. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
  103. Niger, M. (2023). Analyzing Accessibility of Public Open Space in Relation to Urban Configuration of Dhaka City. Journal of Research in Infrastructure Designing, 6(2), 7–19. http://hbrppublication.com/OJS/index.php/JRID/article/view/3727