KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research on Education and Psychology / 2026 / Volume: 5 Issue: 1

A Scale Development Study: Validity and Reliability of the Educational Skills Scale

Aliye Cayır(NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0760-4248
Sevim Ulupınar(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ - CERRAHPAŞA)0000-0003-1208-2042
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that the scale that was developed is a valid and reliable measurement instrument in determining educational skills.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable measurement instrument towards the educational skills of instructors.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample of the study consisted of 380 instructors who were employed at a university.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that the scale that was developed is a valid and reliable measurement instrument in determining educational skills.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Educational skills instructor · Reliability · Scale

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable measurement instrument towards the educational skills of instructors. This is a methodological study. The sample of the study consisted of 380 instructors who were employed at a university. During the scale development process, an item pool was created by reviewing the literature, content and construct validity and item reliability analyses were carried out. The data were collected by using a Personal Information Form and the Educational Skills Scale Draft Form. In the study, the item pool consisting of 86 items was rearranged in line with expert opinions and according to the results of preliminary implementation. For the Educational Skills Draft Scale with 58 items remaining, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.89 and the adequacy of the sample size was confirmed. According to the Bartlett’s test results (p<0.05) there was correlation among the items. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, factors as planning, implementation and assessment were obtained. The three factors of the scale were found to explain 42.32% of the total variance. The first factor explained 28.47%, the second factor explained 7.81%, and the third factor explained 6.02% of the total variance. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed that the factorial structure revealed by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was confirmed, and the factor loads varied between 0.44 and 0.79. For the 5-point Likert-type Educational Skills Draft Scale with 38 items after analyses, the Cronbach’s Alpha value was found 0.93. The Cronbach’s alpha values of three factors were 0.88 for the planning dimension, 0.84 for the implementation dimension and 0.87 for the assessment dimension. It was concluded that the scale that was developed is a valid and reliable measurement instrument in determining educational skills.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Cayır, A., Ulupınar, S. (2021). A Scale Development Study: Validity and Reliability of the Educational Skills Scale. Research on Education and Psychology, Volume: 5 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1537147

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (45)

  1. Ağıralioğlu, N. (2013). Türkiye’de lisansüstü öğretim. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 3(1),1-9 Erişim 15.06.2019. http://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2013.053
  2. Aktan, C. (2007). Change in higher education: Global trends and new paradigms. Yaşar University Publication. http://eds.sakarya.edu.tr/sites/eds.sakarya.edu.tr/file/3/aktan-trendler
  3. Aslantaş, H.İ. (2011). Student vıews regardıng teachıng staffs' suffıcencıes ın teachıng strategıes- methods and technıques, communıcatıon. Journal of Mustafa Kemal Unıversıty Socıal Scıences Instıtute, 8, 487-506.
  4. Başbuğ, G., & Ünsal, P. (2010). Opinions of academic staff about a performance evaluation system to be established: A survey conducted at a public university. Journal of Istanbul University Psychology Studies, 29(1), 1-24.
  5. Bayık, A. (2001, 19-22 September). What kind of a change in nursing, nursing education and roles of nursing educators in the twenty-first century? I. International and National Nursing Education Congress, Nevsehir, Turkey.
  6. Bayram, N. (2017). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. Ezgi Publication.
  7. Bergan, S. & Damain, R. (2010). Higher education for modern societies-competences and values. Council of Europe Publishing.
  8. Brechelmacher, A. et al. (2015). The rocky road to tenure – career paths in academia. In T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec & B. M. Kehm (Eds). Academic Workand Careers in Europe: Trends, Challenges, Perspectives (ss. 13-40). Cham, Springer International Publishing.
  9. Brown, R. (2018). Higher education and inequality. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 22(2), 3743.
  10. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Data analysis for social sciences: statistics, research design SPSS applications and interpretation. Pegem A Publishing.
  11. Chan, R., Brown, G. & Ludlow, L. (2014, April). What is the purpose of higher education? A comparison of instituonal and student perspectives on the goals and purposes of completing a bachelor’s degree in the 21 st.centry. American Education Research Association (AERA) Conferance.
  12. Demir, R., & Acar, A. C. (2011, 26-28 May). Performance-related remuneration: A study to determine the attitudes of academic staff working in public universities towards performance-related remuneration. 19th National Management and Organization Congress Proceedings, Çanakkale, Turkey.
  13. DeVellis, R.F. (2014). Scale Development;Theory and applications. Sage.
  14. Djelic, M. (2008). Phd education-challenges and opportunities of europeanization. In G. Mazza, P. Quattrone, & A. Riccaboni (Eds), European Universities in Transition: Issues, Models, and Cases. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publising.
  15. Doğramacı, İ. (2007). Higher education management in Turkey and the world. Meteksan.
  16. Erdem, A.R. (2015). The critical element that differentiates higher education and university: Academic strategy. In A.Aypay (Eds), Higher Education in Turkey: Space, Inside Scope and Policy (ss. 243-260). Pegem Academy Publishing.
  17. Ergün, M. (2001, 11-13 January). Improving teaching effectiveness in universities. National Symposium of Turkish National Education Organization and Administration in 2000, Ankara, Turkey.
  18. Ergün, M. (2003). Improving teaching activity at Afyon Kocatepe University. XII. Educational Sciences Congress, Afyon, Turkey.
  19. Esen, M., & Esen, D. (2015). Investigation of the attitudes of faculty members towards performance evaluation system. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 52-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.109
  20. Eurydice Report (2010). Focus on higher education in Europe 2010: The impact of the Bologna process. http://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2010.
  21. Eurydice Report (2017). Structural indicators for monitoring education an training systems in Europe. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice
  22. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon Publish
  23. Helterbran, V.R. (2008). The ideal professor: Student perceptions of effective instructor practices, attitudes, and skills. Education, 129(1), 125-138. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ816980
  24. Jackson, M. (2006). ‘Serving Time’: the relationship of good and bad teaching. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(4), 385-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610703965
  25. Kalaycı, N. (2009). Methods used in the process of evaluating the teaching performance of academicians in higher education institutions. Educational Administration. Theory and Practice, 15(60), 625-656. http://dergipark.org.tr/kuey/issue/10337/126671
  26. Karadağ, N., Özdemir, S. (2017). The Views of Faculty Members and Phd Students on the Processes of Doctoral Education in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7(2), 267-281. http://dxdoi.org/10.5961/jhes.2017.206
  27. Kashkan, G.V., & Egorova, M.S. (2015). Problems and outlooks of international integration of higher education. International Education Studies, 8(7), 250-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n7p250
  28. Marginson, S. (2016). High participation systems of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(2), 243-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777401
  29. Matas, C.P. (2012). Doctoral education and skills devalopment: An international perspertive. Reviste de Docencia Universitaria, 10(2), 163-168. http://redaberta.usc.es/redu
  30. Özçakır Sümen, Ö., & Kesten, A. (2014). School of education students' expectations from their lecturers and their views on whether these are fulfilled. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.256837
  31. Özdamar K. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling for Scale and Test Development. 1st Edition. Eskisehir: Nisan Bookstore.
  32. Özdemir, E., & Üzel, D. (2010). Examining the opinions of elementary mathematics teacher candidates about the instructor characteristics. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 10(20), 122-152. http://dergipark.org.tr/maeuefd/issue/19393/205967
  33. Philadelphia, PA.Davis D., Stullenbarger, E., Dearman C., & Kelley, C. A. (2005). Proposed nurse educator competencies: Development and validation of a model. Nurs Outlook, 53,206-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2005.01.006
  34. Sökmen, S. (2001). Situation Assessment for Improvement of Education in Nursing Schools. (Unpublished master's thesis) Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences, Istanbul.
  35. Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. (4th Ed). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
  36. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Nobel Publications. Ankara.
  37. Telli Yamamoto, G. (2018). Thoughts on the higher education system in Turkey. Journal of University Research, 1(3), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.482681
  38. Ulupınar, S. (1998, 14-16 May). Qualities of Teachers According to Students and Teaching Staff. International Participation VI. National Nursing Congress. Ankara, Turkey.
  39. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1998). World Declaration on Higher Education for The Twenty First Century: Vision and Action, 9 October. www.unesco.org/education/./declaration_eng.ht.
  40. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2009). 2009 World Higher Education Conference: New dynamics of higher education and research for social change and development. Final declaration. Paris. http://webb.deu.edu.tr/bologna/diger_bildirgeler/yuksekogretim_konferansi_bildirgesi
  41. Vatansever, K., & Durak, H.İ. (2007). How to teach educational development in medicine: A review of learning theories, basic concepts, practices and examples. Medical Education World, 24, 28-37. http://dergipark.org.tr/ted/issue/21310/228669
  42. World Health Organization. (2016). Nurse educator core competencies. Printed by the WHO Document Production Services, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/nurse_educator
  43. Wood, M., & Su, F. (2017). What makes an excellent lecturer? Academics’ perspectives on the discourse of‘teaching excellence’ in highe education. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(4), 451-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1301911
  44. Higher Education Academic Evaluation and Quality Improvement Commission. (2007). Guidelines for academic evaluation and quality improvement in higher education institutions. http://www.yodek.org.tr
  45. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1998). World Declaration on Higher Education for The Twenty First Century: Vision and Action, 9 October. www.unesco.org/education/./declaration_eng.ht.