KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2018 / Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Adsorption of safranin-O dye by peanut shell-based polyurethane type foam

Bilal Acemioğlu0000-0002-0728-2747
Melike Hilal Bilir0000-0001-9987-1882
Mehmet Hakkı Alma0000-0001-6323-7230
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Moreover, FTIR and SEM analyses were done, and the results were interpreated in detail.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The adsorption of safranin-O dye was performed in batch and continuous column sysytems by polyurethane-type rigid foam produced from peanut shell.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In column system, solution flow rate and initial dye concentration effect were studied.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Moreover, FTIR and SEM analyses were done, and the results were interpreated in detail.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Peanut shell · polyurethane foam · safranin-O

Abstract

The adsorption of safranin-O dye was performed in batch and continuous column sysytems by polyurethane-type rigid foam produced from peanut shell. In batch system, effects of contact time, initial dye concentration, solution pH and temperature on the adsorption were investigated. In column system, solution flow rate and initial dye concentration effect were studied. Under conditions studied, the adsorption of safranin-O was 95-99% for batch system, and 93-99% for column system. Adsorption isotherm best followed the Langmuir model ( R 2 = 0.986). Adsorption kinetics was in consistent with best the pseudo-second order model ( R 2 values ≥ 0.998). Adsorption was of sponteneous nature and in favor of increasing temperature (i.e. endothermic nature). For example, when the temperature was increased from 20 to 60 ° C, standard Gibbs free energy change ( ΔG ° ) dereased regularitly from -5303 to -8170 J mol -1 . The values of standard enthalpy (Δ H ° ) and standard entropy (Δ S ° ) were estimated as 13.35 kJ mol -1 and 0.64 kJ mol -1 K -1 , respectively. Moreover, FTIR and SEM analyses were done, and the results were interpreated in detail.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Acemioğlu, B., Bilir, M. H., Alma, M. H. (2018). Adsorption of safranin-O dye by peanut shell-based polyurethane type foam. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 2 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.454516

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (45)

  1. Naseem, K.; Farooqi, Z. H.; Begum, R.; Ghufran, M.; UrRehman, M. Z.; Najeeb, J.; Irfan, A.;.Al-Sehemi, A.G. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 268, 229-238.
  2. Fu, J.; Xin, Q.; Wu, X.; Chen, Z.; Yan, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, M.; Xu, Q. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2016, 461, 292-304.
  3. Acemioğlu, B. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2004, 274, 371-379.
  4. Acemioğlu, B. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 106, 73-81.
  5. Uğurlu, M. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 119, 276-283.
  6. Vanaamudan, A.; Pathan, N.; Pamidimukkala, P. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52 (7-9) 1589-1599.
  7. Bankole, P.O.; Adekunle, A.A.; Govindwar, S.P. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6(2), 1589-1600.
  8. Acemioğlu, B.; Kertmen, M.; Digrak, M.; Alma, M.H.; Temiz, F. Asian J. Chem. 2010, 22(2), 1394-1402.
  9. Martorell, M. M.; Pajot, H. F.; de Figueroa, L. I. C. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5987-5993.
  10. Errgene, A.; Ada, K.; Tan, S.; Katırcıoğlu, H. Desalination 2009, 249, 1308-1314.
  11. Sartape, A.S.; Mandhare, A.M.; Jadhav, V.V.; Raut, P.D.; Kolekar, S.S. Arabian J. Chem. 2017, 3229-3238.
  12. Şen, A.; Pereira, H.; Olivella, M. A.; Villaescusa, I. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 391-404.
  13. Acemioğlu, B.; Alma, M. H.; Demirkıran, A. R. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2004, 26(1), 82-89.
  14. Ning-chuan, F.; Xue-yi, G. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2012, 22, 1224-1231.
  15. Temesgen, F.; Gabbiye, N.; Sahu, O. Surfaces Interfaces 2018, 12, 151-159.
  16. Amela, K.; Hassen, M. A.; Kerroum, D. Energy Proced. 2012,19, 286-295.
  17. Kule, L.; Acemioğlu, B.; Baran, E. Int. J. Chem. Technol. 2017, 1, 58-66.
  18. Tanyildizi, M.Ş. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 168(3), 1234-1240.
  19. Kara, A.; Acemioğlu, B.; Alma, M.H.; Cebe, M. J. Appl. Polym. 2006, 101, 2838-2846.
  20. Kupeta, A. J. K.; Naidoo, E. B.; Ofomaja, A. E. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 179, 191-209.
  21. Domínguez-Robles, J.; Peresin, M.S.; Tamminen, T.; Rodríguez, A.; Jääskeläinen, A.S. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 1249-1259.
  22. Bilir, M. H.; Sakalar, N.; Acemioğlu, B.; Baran, E.; Alma, M. H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 6, 4340-4350.
  23. Sakalar, N.; Bilir, M. H.; Acemioğlu, B.; Hakkı Alma, M. H. Asian J. Chem. 2010, 22(7), 5649-5662.
  24. Sahu, M.K.; Patel, R.K. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 78491-78501.
  25. Dmitrienko, S. G.; Siviridova, O. A.; Pyatkova, L. N.; Senyamin, V. M. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374(3), 361-368.
  26. Hameed, B. H.; Mahmoud, D. K.; Ahmad, A.L.; J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 158(2-3) 499-506.
  27. Bayramoğlu, G.; Arica, M. Y. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 143(1-2), 135-143.
  28. Dwivedi, M. K., Neeraj Jain, Pragati Sharma and Chanchala Alawa, J. Appl. Chem. 2015, 8, 27-35.
  29. Liu, R.; Zhang, B.; Mei, D.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J. Desalination 2011, 268, 111-116.
  30. Lakshmi Prasanna, M.; Sumithra, S.; Madakka, M. Int. J. Recent Scientific Research 2016, 7 (4), 10401-10405.
  31. Weber, W.J.; Morris, J.C. J. Sanit Eng. Div. 1963, 89, 31-59.
  32. Lagergren, S. Kung. Sven. Veten. Hand. 1898, 24, 1-39.
  33. Y. S. Ho, G. Mckay, Chem. Eng. J. 1998, 70(2), 115-124.
  34. Azizian, S.; Haerifar, M.; Bashiri, H. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 146, 36-41.
  35. Moawed, E.A.; Abulkibash, A.B. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2016, 20, S178-S185.
  36. Acemioğlu, B. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93, 99-102.
  37. Hema M.; Arivoli, S. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2007, 2, 10-17.
  38. Fayazi, M.; Afzali, D.; Taher, M.A.; Mostafavi, A.; Gupta, V.K. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 212, 675-685.
  39. Adebowale, K. A.; Olu-Owalabi, B. I.; Chigbundu, E. C. J. Encapsulation Adsorption Sci. 2014, 4, 89-104.
  40. Yusuf, M.; Elfghi, F. M.; Mallak, S. K. Iranica J. Energy Environ. 2015, 6, 173-180.
  41. Kumar, K.V.; Sivanesan, S. Dyes Pigm. 2007, 72,130-133.
  42. Dehury, K. K. MSc. Thesis, Removal of Safranin-O dye from aqueous solution using acid activated red mud. National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 2014.
  43. Laskar, N.; Kumar, U. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 225, 012105.
  44. Farahani, M.; Kashisaz, M.; Abdullah. S.R.S. Inter. J. Ecol. Sci. Environ. Eng. 2015, 2(3), 17-29.
  45. Naseem, K.; Farooqi, Z. H.; Begum, R.; Ghufran, M.; UrRehman, M. Z.; Najeeb, J.; Irfan, A.;.Al-Sehemi, A.G. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 268, 229-238.