KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Use of peanut shell-based polyurethane type rigid foam in removing remazol orange RGB dye from aqueous solution

Bilal Acemioğlu(Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi)0000-0002-0728-2747
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2020-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, it was determined that the polyurethane-type rigid foam produced from peanut shell could be used as an alternative to activated carbon and could easily be used as an adsorptive material to remove RO-RGB dye.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study reflects the adsorption ability and usable of peanut shell-polyurethane type rigid foam for the removal of remazol orange RGB (RO-RGB) dye, a reactive dye, from aqueous solution.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:RO-RGB removal was studied for initial dye concentrations (10-150 mg l-1), pH values (3-9), and temperatures (20-60C) at various contact times.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, it was determined that the polyurethane-type rigid foam produced from peanut shell could be used as an alternative to activated carbon and could easily be used as an adsorptive material to remove RO-RGB dye.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Peanut shell · polyurethane type rigid foam · remazol orange RGB

Abstract

This study reflects the adsorption ability and usable of peanut shell-polyurethane type rigid foam for the removal of remazol orange RGB (RO-RGB) dye, a reactive dye, from aqueous solution. RO-RGB removal was studied for initial dye concentrations (10-150 mg l-1), pH values (3-9), and temperatures (20-60C) at various contact times. Dye removal increased with the increases in initial dye concentration and temperature while it was decreasing with an increase in pH. Maximum dye removal was determined to be about 98% under all the experimental conditions. Equilibrium data obtained were adapted to the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models, and it was seen that the adsorption obeyed the Freundlich isotherm model with determination of coefficient of r2 = 0.966. Kinetics data was found to be harmony with the pseudo-second kinetic order model (higher than r2 = 0.9908). As a result, it was determined that the polyurethane-type rigid foam produced from peanut shell could be used as an alternative to activated carbon and could easily be used as an adsorptive material to remove RO-RGB dye.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Acemioğlu, B. (2020). Use of peanut shell-based polyurethane type rigid foam in removing remazol orange RGB dye from aqueous solution. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 4 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.725783

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (36)

  1. Acemioğlu, B. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2004, 274, 371-379.
  2. Aljeboree, A. M.; Alshirifi, A. N.; Alkaim, A. F. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S3381-S3393.
  3. El-Aila, H. J.; Elsousy, K. M.; Hartany, K. A. Arab. J. Chem. 2016, 9, S198-S203.
  4. Naseem, K.; Farooqi, Z. H.; Begum, R.; Ghufran, M.; UrRehman, M. Z.; Najeeb, J.; Irfan, A.;.Al-Sehemi, A.G. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 268, 229-238.
  5. Fu, J.; Xin, Q.; Wu, X.; Chen, Z.; Yan, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, M.; Xu, Q. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2016, 461, 292-304.
  6. Zhang, F.; Lan, J.; Yang, Y.; Wei, T.; Tan, R.; Song. W. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, Article number: 2034.
  7. Acemioğlu, B. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 106, 73-81.
  8. Adeyemo, A. A.; Adeoye, I. O.; Bello, O. S. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 543-568.
  9. Acemioğlu, B.; Kertmen, M.; Digrak, M.; Alma, M.H.; Temiz, F. Asian J. Chem. 2010, 22 (2), 1394-1402.
  10. Bankole, P.O.; Adekunle, A.A.; Govindwar, S.P. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6(2), 1589-1600.
  11. Errgene, A.; Ada, K.; Tan, S.; Katırcıoğlu, H. Desalination 2009, 249, 1308-1314.
  12. Martorell, M. M.; Pajot, H. F.; de Figueroa, L. I. C. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5987-5993.
  13. Jóźwiak, T. C.; Filipkowska, U.; Bugajska, P.; Kalkowski, T. J. Ecol. Eng. 2018, 19 (4), 129-135.
  14. Husein, D. Z.; Aazam, E.; Battia, M. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2017, 42, 2403-2415.
  15. Acemioğlu, B.; Alma, M. H.; Demirkıran, A. R. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2004, 26 (1), 82-89.
  16. Rajamohan, N.; Rajasimman, M.; Rajeshkannan, R. R.; Saravanan, V. Alexandria Eng. J. 2014, 53, 409-415.
  17. Guo, Y.; Zhu, W.; Li, G.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L. J Chem-NY, 2016, Article ID 6326372.
  18. Kule, L.; Acemioğlu, B.; Baran, E. Int. J. Chem. Technol. 2017, 1, 58-66.
  19. Acemioglu, B.; Sakalar, N. Fresen. Environ. Bull. 2017, 26 (8), 5305-5313.
  20. Kara, A.; Acemioğlu, B.; Alma, M.H.; Cebe, M. J. Appl. Polym. 2006, 101, 2838-2846.
  21. Kupeta, A. J. K.; Naidoo, E. B.; Ofomaja, A. E. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 179, 191-209.
  22. Domínguez-Robles, J.; Peresin, M.S.; Tamminen, T.; Rodríguez, A.; Jääskeläinen, A.S. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 1249-1259.
  23. Acemioğlu, B. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. DOI: 10.1080/19392699.2019.1644326
  24. Acemioğlu, B.; Bilir, M. H.; Alma, M. H. Int. J. Chem. Technol. 2018, 2 (2), 95-104.
  25. Bilir, M. H.; Sakalar, N.; Acemioğlu, B.; Baran, E.; Alma, M. H. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 6, 4340-4350.
  26. Samil, A.; Acemioğlu, B.; Gültekin, G.; Alma, M. H. Asian J. Chem. 2011, 23 (7) 3224-3230.
  27. Zhao, B.; Xiao, W.; Shang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Han, R. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S3595-S3602.
  28. Thirumalisamy, S.; Subbian, M. BioResources 2010, 5 (1), 419-437.
  29. Koçer, O.; Acemioğlu, B. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 1–17.
  30. Lagergren, S. Kung. Sven. Veten. Hand. 1898, 24, 1-39.
  31. Ho, Y. S.; Mckay, G. Chem. Eng. J. 1998, 70 (2), 115-124.
  32. Weber, W.J.; Morris, J.C. J. Sanit Eng. Div. 1963, 89, 31-59.
  33. Jiang, X.; Sun, Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, S.; Tian, X. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 235, 151-157.
  34. Mihăilescu, M.; Negrea, A.; Ciopec, M.; Davidescu, C. M.; Negrea, P.; Narcis Duţeanu, N.; Rusu, G. Sci. Rep-UK 2019, 9:8757.
  35. Bhadusha, N.; Ananthabaskaran, T. E-J. Chem. 2011, 8 (4), 1696-1707.
  36. Naseem, K.; Farooqi, Z. H.; Begum, R.; Ghufran, M.; UrRehman, M. Z.; Najeeb, J.; Irfan, A.;.Al-Sehemi, A.G. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 268, 229-238.