KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Fracture patterns and mechanical properties of GFRP bars as internal reinforcement in concrete structures

Mehmet CANBAZ
Uğur ALBAYRAK
Sayfa
69–74
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to the test results reported in this study, GFRP bars are used safely insteadof steel bars in terms of mechanical properties.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic (GFRP) composites as rolled bars can be used as steel rebar to prevent oxidation or rust which is one of the main reasons concrete struc-tures deteriorate when exposed to chlorides and other harmful chemicals.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yield strength, strain and modulus of elasticities of GFRP samples are compared to steel rebar.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to the test results reported in this study, GFRP bars are used safely insteadof steel bars in terms of mechanical properties.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic (GFRP) composites as rolled bars can be used as steel rebar to prevent oxidation or rust which is one of the main reasons concrete struc-tures deteriorate when exposed to chlorides and other harmful chemicals. GFRP is successful alternative for reinforcement with high tensile strength-low strain, cor-rosion resistance and congenital electromagnetic neutrality in terms of longer ser-vice life. The main goal of the study is to investigate the mechanical and bonding properties of GFRP bars and equivalent steel reinforcing bars then comparethem. GFRP and steel rebar are embedded in concrete block with three different levels. Me-chanical properties of GFRP and steel bars in terms of strength and strains are deter-mined. On the other hand; modulus of elasticity of GFRP and steel bars, modulus of toughness and modulus of resilience were calculated using stress-strain curves, as a result of the experiments. Pull-out tests are conducted on each GFRP and rebar sam-ples which are embedded in concrete for each embedment level and ultimate adher-ence strengths are determined in terms of bar diameter–development length ratio. Yield strength, strain and modulus of elasticities of GFRP samples are compared to steel rebar. According to the test results reported in this study, GFRP bars are used safely insteadof steel bars in terms of mechanical properties.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CANBAZ, M., ALBAYRAK, U. (2020). Fracture patterns and mechanical properties of GFRP bars as internal reinforcement in concrete structures. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 69–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/142191

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Achillides Z, PilakoutasK (2004). Bond behavior of fiber reinforced polymer bars under direct pullout conditions. Journal of Composites for Construction, 8(2), 173–181.
  2. Agarwal A, Garg S, Rakesh PK, Singh I, Mishra BK (2010). Tensile be-havior of glass fiber reinforced plastics subjected to different envi-ronmental conditions. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 17, 471-476.
  3. Albayrak U, Canbaz M (2015). Investigation of fiber reinforced plastic bars utilization instead of steel reinforcing bars in terms of mechan-ical properties. 2nd International Conference on Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering –ICCESEN, 1(1), 264. Anurag G, Singh H, Walia RS (2015). Effect of fillers on tensile strength of pultruded glass fiber reinforced polymer composite. Indian Jour-nal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 22, 62-70.
  4. Aydin F (2018). Experimental investigation of thermal expansion and concrete strength effects on FRP bars behavior embedded in con-crete. Construction and Building Materials, 163, 1-8.
  5. Basaran B, Kalkan I (2020). Investigation on variables affecting bond strength between FRP reinforcing bar and concrete by modified hinged beam tests. Composite Structures, 112185. Bhashya V, Kumar SS, Ramesh G, Bharatkumar BH, Krishnamoorthy TS, Nagesh RI (2015). Long term studies on FRP strengthened concrete specimens. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 22, 465-472.
  6. Chen Y, Davalos JF, Raya I, Kim HY (2007). Accelerated aging tests for evaluations of durability performance of FRP reinforcing bars for concrete structures. Composite Structures, 78, 101–111.
  7. Durmaz N (2018). Investigation of flexural behaviour of FRP reinforced concrete slabs. M.Sc. thesis, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey. Gangarao HVS, Taly N, Vijay PV (2007). Reinforced Concrete Design with FRP Composites. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Florida, USA.Lawrence CB, Puterman M, Katz A (1998). The effect of material degra-dation on bond properties of fiber reinforced plastic reinforcing bars in concrete. Materials Journal, 95, 232-243.
  8. Najafabadi EP, Bazli M, Ashrafi H, Oskouei AV (2018). Effect of applied stress and bar characteristics on the short-term creep behavior ofFRP bars. Construction and Building Materials, 171, 960-968.
  9. Rolland A, Quiertant M, Khadour A, Chataigner S, Benzarti K, Argoul P (2018). Experimental investigations on the bond behavior between concrete and FRP reinforcing bars. Construction and Building Mate-rials, 173, 136-1