Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Seismic fragility curves for mid-rise reinforced concrete framed structures with different lateral loads resisting systems

Sayfa
109–121
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The analysis outcomes also indicated that the presence of the rigid marginal beam in the lower storey gives more efficiency regarding to lateral loads resistance in the studied structure.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The current study presents lateral load analysis of mid-rise reinforced concrete framed structures with two different lateral load resisting systems; shear walls and rigid marginal beams.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For that purpose, seismic fragility curves are used as an assessment tool for comparing the seismic performance of the studied structures in different situations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The analysis outcomes also indicated that the presence of the rigid marginal beam in the lower storey gives more efficiency regarding to lateral loads resistance in the studied structure.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The current study presents lateral load analysis of mid-rise reinforced concrete framed structures with two different lateral load resisting systems; shear walls and rigid marginal beams. The main objective here is to investigate the influence of the location of the system in the structure; i.e. arrangement of shear walls and level of the marginal beam. For that purpose, seismic fragility curves are used as an assessment tool for comparing the seismic performance of the studied structures in different situations. Incremental dynamic analysis was performed under ten ground motions to determine the yielding and collapse capacity of each building. Five performance levels were considered in the analysis. These performance levels are (i) operational, (ii) immediate occupancy, (iii) damage control, (iv) life safety and (v) collapse preven-tion. Fragility curves were developed for the structural models of the studied struc-tures considering the previously mentioned performance levels. It was observed that arrangement of shear walls on the long direction of the structure has insignificant effects on its performance while interior shear walls provide the best behavior of the structure compared to exterior shear walls only and distributing shear walls internally and externally. The analysis outcomes also indicated that the presence of the rigid marginal beam in the lower storey gives more efficiency regarding to lateral loads resistance in the studied structure.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HEKAL, G. M., KANDEEL, K., DAWOD, A., EL-SHAMI, M. M. (2022). Seismic fragility curves for mid-rise reinforced concrete framed structures with different lateral loads resisting systems. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 109–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/473698

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. ATC (2002). Development of Performance-Based Earthquake Design Guidelines. Redwood City: ATC-58. Bommer JJ, Acevedo AB, and Douglas J (2003). The selection and scal- ing of real earthquake accelerograms for use in seismic design and assessment. In: Proceeding of ACI international conference on seis- mic bridge design and retrofit. La Jolla, CA: American Concrete In- stitute. Cherng R (2001). Preliminary Study on the Fragility Curves for Steel Structures in Taipei. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seis- mology, 3(1), 35-42. ECP 203 (2007). Egyptian code of practice for design and construction of concrete structures. National Center of Housing and Building Re- searches, Cairo, Egypt. ENV 1998-1 (2005). Eurocode8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Code of Practice, London. Farsi M, Cherif F, Kaci S, Belaidi O, Taouche-Kheloui F (2015). Seismic vulnerability of reinforced concrete structures in Tizi-Ouzou City (Algeria). 1st International Conference on Structural Integrity, 2015, 838-845. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 273 (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 349, FEMA/EERI (2000). Action plan for performance – based seismic design. Wash- ington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 356 (2000). Pre- standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of build- ings. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 450 (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Part 1: provisions. Washington DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Hamburger RO (1998). Performance-based analysis and design proce- dure for moment resisting steel frames. Background Document, SAC Steel Project. Heidebrecht A (2004). Code development issues arising from the prep- aration of the seismic provisions of the national building Code of Canada. 13WCEE, Vancouver, Canada: 3218-3228.
  2. Ibrahim Y (2009). Performance limits of mid-rise moment-resisting framed structures in low seismicity areas. 11th Arab Structural En- gineering Conference, 25-27
  3. October. Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: KFUPM. Ibrahim Y and El-Shami M (2011). Seismic fragility curves for mid-rise reinforced concrete frames in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The IES Journal