Dergiler / Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

AN ACTIVITY SHOWING HOW TO USE HISTORY OF SCIENCE IN TEACHING NATURE OF SCIENCE

BİLİMİN DOĞASI ÖĞRETİMİNDE BİLİM TARİHİNİN NASIL KULLANILABİLECEĞİNİ GÖSTEREN BİR ETKİNLİK

Sayfa
164–174
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Since the history of science activities in teaching key aspects of nature of science are still insufficient, the activity might both contribute to filling this gap in the literature and provide an example for science teachers to teach nature of science.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to develop a history of science activity which can be used to improve middle school students' nature of science views.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The activity was designed for grade 6 students and implemented during the 3-hour class period.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Since the history of science activities in teaching key aspects of nature of science are still insufficient, the activity might both contribute to filling this gap in the literature and provide an example for science teachers to teach nature of science.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The purpose of this study is to develop a history of science activity which can be used to improve middle school students' nature of science views. The activity was designed and implemented based on an explicit-reflective approach within the context of the circulatory system. The activity was designed for grade 6 students and implemented during the 3-hour class period. During the implementation, most of the students successfully participated in the whole class discussion and established a connection between historical material and the corresponding nature of science aspect. Since the history of science activities in teaching key aspects of nature of science are still insufficient, the activity might both contribute to filling this gap in the literature and provide an example for science teachers to teach nature of science.

Abstract

Bu çalışmada ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilimin doğasına yönelik görüşlerini geliştirmek için kullanılabilecek bir bilim tarihi etkinliği ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Etkinlik dolaşım sistemi bağlamında açık-yansıtıcı yaklaşıma dayalı olarak tasarlanmış ve uygulanmıştır. Geliştirilen etkinlik 6. sınıf öğrencilerine uygulanmış ve toplamda 3 ders saati sürmüştür. Etkinlik; tarihsel materyali deneyimleme, düşündürücü soruları yanıtlama, tüm sınıf tartışması ve genellemelere ulaşma şeklinde 4 temel basamak kullanılarak tasarlanmış ve uygulanmıştır. Uygulama sırasında öğrencilerin çoğu başarılı bir şekilde sınıf tartışmalarına katılmış ve aktivite ile bilimin doğasının ilgili boyutu arasında bağlantı kurabilmişlerdir. Bilimin doğası öğretiminde bilim tarihi etkinliklerinin kullanımı halen yetersiz olduğundan, etkinlik literatürdeki bu boşluğu doldurmaya katkı sağlayabileceği gibi, fen bilimleri öğretmenlerine de biliminin doğasını nasıl öğretebileceklerine yönelik bir örnek teşkil eder.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CANSIZ, M. (2019). AN ACTIVITY SHOWING HOW TO USE HISTORY OF SCIENCE IN TEACHING NATURE OF SCIENCE. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 164–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/141931

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087–2107.
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2009). The influence of metacognitive training on preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2161–2184.
  3. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095.
  4. Bauer, H. H. (1992). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  5. Bell, R. L. (2006). Perusing Pandora’s box. Exploring the what, when, and how of nature of science instruction. In L. B. Flick, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 427–446). Dordrecht: Springer. Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.
  6. Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26.
  7. Cansiz, M. (2014). The effect of history of science instruction on elementary students' scientific literacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara,
  8. Turkey. Clough, M. P. (1997). Strategies and activities for initiating and maintaining pressure on students’ naive views concerning the nature of science. Interchange, 28(2–3), 191–204.
  9. Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science & Education, 15(5), 463-494.
  10. DeBoer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
  11. Diem, H. T. T., & Yuenyong, C. (2018). Should we add history of science to provide nature of science into Vietnamese biology textbook: A case of evolution and genetics teaching? The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 161-168.
  12. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young peoples’ images of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  13. Duschl, R. (2000). Making the nature of science explicit. In R.