KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sosyoekonomi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 9

Effects of Economic Growth on Democratization in Transition Economies: A Panel Data Approach

Selim BAŞAR
Ali GÜLLÜCE
Şaduman YILDIZ
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2009-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Whilst democratization level is negatively affected by increasing population, the effect of inflation is ambiguous.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Democratization had occurred in a long historical process and had developed itself by having different evolutions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It had been claimed that democratization was based on some social conditions until 1959.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Whilst democratization level is negatively affected by increasing population, the effect of inflation is ambiguous.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2005 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Democratization had occurred in a long historical process and had developed itself by having different evolutions. It had been claimed that democratization was based on some social conditions until 1959. However, Lipset (1959) suggested that democracy is based not only on social conditions but also on economic growth. Relationships between economic growth and democratization have been a significant issue for many studies particularly in the last three decades. Within this study, the effects of economic growth on democratization have been investigated by using a panel data set for 1993-2005 periods for 24 transition economies. According to the estimating results, democratization process is positively affected by income level. Whilst democratization level is negatively affected by increasing population, the effect of inflation is ambiguous.

Abstract

Democratization had occurred in a long historical process and had developed itself by having different evolutions. It had been claimed that democratization was based on some social conditions until 1959. However, Lipset (1959) suggested that democracy is based not only on social conditions but also on economic growth. Relationships between economic growth and democratization have been a significant issue for many studies particularly in the last three decades. Within this study, the effects of economic growth on democratization have been investigated by using a panel data set for 1993-2005 periods for 24 transition economies. According to the estimating results, democratization process is positively affected by income level. Whilst democratization level is negatively affected by increasing population, the effect of inflation is ambiguous.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAŞAR, S., GÜLLÜCE, A., YILDIZ, Ş. (2009). Effects of Economic Growth on Democratization in Transition Economies: A Panel Data Approach. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 9. https://ajindex.com/articles/139731

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, J.A. Robinson, P. Yared (2005), “Income and Democracy”, NBER Working Paper Series, 11205, 1-64.
  2. Alesina, A., S. Özler, N. Roubini, P. Swagel (1996), “Political Instability and Economic Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 189-211.
  3. Alfaro, J.A. (2002), “Economic Development and Democracy: Can Modernization Theory Be Upheld in Central America?”, 2. Revista de Ciencias Economicas, Universidad de Costa Rica, XX (1),, (22.06.2007).
  4. Arat, Z.F. (1988), “Democracy and Economic Development: Modernization Theory Revisite”, Comparative Politics, 21 (1), 21–36.
  5. Arat, Z.F. (1991), Democracy and Human Rights in Developing Countries, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Baltaghi, B.H. (2005),
  6. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley and Sons. Banks, A.S. (1994), Cross-Polity Time-Series Data Archive, Binghamton NY: State University of New York. Barro, R.J. (1999), “Determinants of Democracy”, Journal of Political Economy, 107 (6), 158–83.
  7. Beetham, D. (1994),
  8. Defining and Measuring Democracy, London. Bernhagen, P. (2001), Economic Development and Democracy in Latin America: A Replication and Extension,, (12.10.2006).
  9. Boix, C., S.C. Stokes (2003), “Endogenous Democratization”, World Politics, 55, 517-49.
  10. Bollen, K.A. (1979), “Political Democracy and the Timing of Development”, American Socialical Review, 44, 572–87.
  11. Bollen, K.A. (1993), “Liberal Democracy: Validity and Method Factors in Cross-National Measures”, American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1207-1230.
  12. Burkhart, R.E., M.S. Lewis-Beck (1994), “Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis”, American Political Science Review, 88 (4), 903–10.
  13. Coleman, J.S. (1960), “Conclusion: The Political Systems of The Developing Area”, in Almond, G.A., Coleman, J.S., eds., The Politics of Developing Areas, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 532-81’den aktaran: Arat, Z.F. (1988), “Democracy and Development: Modernization Theory Revisited”, Comparative Politics, 21 (1), 22. Coppedge, M., H. Wolfgang (1990), “Measuring Polyarchy”, Studies on Comparative Internatioal Development, 25, 51-72.
  14. Cutright, P. (1963), “National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis”, American Sociological Review, 28, 253–64.
  15. Dahl, R.A. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  16. Epstein, D.L. (2006), “Democratic Transitions”, American Journal of Political Science, 50 (3), 1–33.
  17. Freedom House (2007), Freedom in the World,, (08.02.2007). Freedom House (2006 & 2008),