A critical synthesis of these individual and social approaches was developed by Marx and the inadequacy of considering religion as a purely epistemological problem was ignored.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study deals with the question of religion, which constitutes a basic discussion of political and social theory with the birth of the modern state.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The autonomization of politics from religion, with various scientific developments has led to the secularization of other scopes of society and the public functions of religion have become increasingly debatable.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A critical synthesis of these individual and social approaches was developed by Marx and the inadequacy of considering religion as a purely epistemological problem was ignored.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Religion-Politics Relationship · Social Theory · Enlightenment
Abstract
This study deals with the question of religion, which constitutes a basic discussion of political and social theory with the birth of the modern state. The autonomization of politics from religion, with various scientific developments has led to the secularization of other scopes of society and the public functions of religion have become increasingly debatable. Two moments and their synthesis can be mentioned here. After the French Revolution, the Enlightenment's critical debate on an individual basis turned into a supportive debate focusing on the social function of religion. A critical synthesis of these individual and social approaches was developed by Marx and the inadequacy of considering religion as a purely epistemological problem was ignored.
Kutlu, A. (2020). From Individual Freedom to Social Order: The Religion Question in Social Theory. Fiscaoeconomia, Volume: 4 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.2020.01.009
Akman, Ayhan (2007), "Eşitlik Çağında Demokrasilerin Özgürlük Sorunsalı: Bireycilik, Din ve Siyaset Üzerine Tocquevilleci Bir Tartışma”, Doğu Batı, 42, 155-65.
Armstrong, Karen (2008), Tanrı’nın Tarihi, çev. O. Özel, H. Koyukan, K. Emiroğlu, Ayraç, Ankara.
Aron, Raymond (2007), Sosyolojik Düşüncenin Evreleri, çev. K. Alemdar, Kırmızı, İstanbul.
Beiner, Ronald (1993), "Machiavelli, Hobbes and Rousseau on Civil Religion", The Review of Politics, Vol. 55, No. 4, 617-38.
Callinicos, Alex (2007), Toplum Kuramı, çev. Y. Tezgiden, İletişim, İstanbul.
Gauchet, Marcel (2000), Demokrasi İçinde Din, çev. M. E. Özcan, Dost, Ankara.
Gauchet, Marcel (2005), "Anlam Borcu ve Devletin Kökenleri: İlkellerde Din ve Siyaset", çev. O. Erözden, içinde Devlet Kuramı, der. C. B. Akal, Dost, Ankara
Hobbes, Thomas (2007), Leviathan, çev. S. Lim, YKY, İstanbul.
Hume, David (2004), Din Üstüne, çev. M. Tunçay, İmge, Ankara.
Machiavelli, Nicolo (2009), Söylevler, çev. A. Tolga, say, İstanbul.
Marx, Karl (1997), Hegel 'in Hukuk Felsefesinin Eleştirisi, çev. K. Somer, Sol, Ankara.
Paine, Thomas (2012), Akıl Çağı, çev. A.İ. Dalgıç, İş Bankası K. Yay, İstanbul.
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1999), Toplum Sözleşmesi, çev. A. Erenbuluğ, Öteki, Ankara.
Weber, Max (2011), Sosyoloji Yazıları, çev. T. Parla, Deniz, İstanbul.