KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yerbilimleri / 2026 / Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1

Investigation of Probable Princes’s Graves and Wall Remains In Alacahöyük Archaeological Site with Ground Penetrating Radar Method

Aysel Şeren(Karadeniz Technical University)
Zeynep Öğretmen Aydın(Karadeniz Technical University)
Ali Erden Babacan(Karadeniz Technical University)
Sayfa
71–86
Yayın Tarihi
2017-04-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Archaeological finds corroborated the existence of remains during the following excavations when strong reflections were observed on the maps. 

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to determine the probable Princes’s graves and wall remains using geophysical Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) method at two study areas defined by archaeologist before in Alacahoyuk archaeological site, Çorum-Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:GPR data were continuously collected in the first site (Area 1) by using the reflection profiling measurement technique with a 100 MHz unshielded antenna on four parallel profiles spaced 1 m apart probable Princes’s graves could be buried there.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Archaeological finds corroborated the existence of remains during the following excavations when strong reflections were observed on the maps. 
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alacahöyük · GPR · time slices/amplitude maps

Özet

The aim of this study is to determine the probable Princes’s graves and wall remains using geophysical Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) method at two study areas defined by archaeologist before in Alacahoyuk archaeological site, Çorum-Turkey. GPR data were continuously collected in the first site (Area 1) by using the reflection profiling measurement technique with a 100 MHz unshielded antenna on four parallel profiles spaced 1 m apart probable Princes’s graves could be buried there. On each profile, measurements were taken for two different positions of the transmitter-receiver antenna due to the directivity properties of the antenna. Probable wall remains could be buried in the second site (Area 2), which has 12 m length and 10 m in width. GPR data were also acquired as in the first study site. On the site, 44 GPR profile measurements have been collected on 22 profiles. After data processing, time slices/amplitude maps were produced from the data collected on 52 profiles according to the different positions of the transmitter-receiver antennas in these sites. It was concluded that the presence and lateral extends of strong reflections on time slices/amplitude maps indicate the locations of some wall remains and probable Princes’ graves. In accordance with these results, excavations were recommended where the presence of anomalies was observed on these maps. Archaeological finds corroborated the existence of remains during the following excavations when strong reflections were observed on the maps. 

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şeren, A., Aydın, Z. Ö., Babacan, A. E. (2017). Investigation of Probable Princes’s Graves and Wall Remains In Alacahöyük Archaeological Site with Ground Penetrating Radar Method. Yerbilimleri, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 1, 71–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/1315761

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (35)

  1. Annan, A.P., 2003. Ground Penetrating Radar Principles, Procedures & Applications, Sensors & Software Inc., Canada.
  2. Arık, R.O., 1937. Alaca Höyük Hafriyatı. 1935 deki Çalışmalara ve Keşiflere ait İlk Rapor. Ankara: Türk Tarihi Kurumu, 5 (1), (In Turkish).
  3. Basile, V., Carrozzo, M.T., Negri, S., Nuzzo, L., Quarta, T. and Villani, A., 2000. A ground-penetrating radar survey for archaeological investigations in an urban area (Lecce, Italy). Journal of Applied Geophysics, 44 (1), 15–32
  4. Bonomo, N., Osella, A. and Ratto, N., 2010. Detecting and mapping buried buildings with Ground-Penetrating Radar at an ancient village in northwestern Argentina, Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 3247-3255.
  5. Conyers, L.B., 2004. Ground-penetrating Radar for Archaeology. AltaMira Press: Walnut, Creek, CA
  6. Çınaroğlu, A., 2003. Alaca Höyük 2001 Yılı Kazı Çalışmaları, 24. Uluslararası Kazı, Araştırma ve Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı, 509-518, Ankara (In Turkish).
  7. Daniels, J.D., 2004. Ground Penetrating Radar 2nd Edition, published by the Iee Radar, Sonar, Navigation and Avionics Series, London, United Kingdom.
  8. Gibson, P. J. and George, D.M., 2006. Geophysical investigation of the site of the former monastic settlement, Clonard, CountyMeath, Ireland. Archaeological Prospection, 13, 45–56.
  9. Goodman, D., Nishimura, Y. and Rogers, D., 1995. GPR time slice in archaeological prospection. Archaeological Prospection, 2 (2), 85-89.
  10. Hruska, J. and Fuchs, G., 1999. GPR prospection in ancient Ephesos. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 41, 293-312.
  11. Johnson, W.J. and Johnson, D.W., 2006. Application of geophysics to North American Prehistoric sites. First Break, 24, 117-122.
  12. Kadioglu, S. and Kadioglu, Y.K., 2010. Picturing internal fractures of historical statues using ground penetrating radar method. Advances in Geosciences, 24, 23–34.
  13. Kadioglu, S., Kadioglu, Y.K., Akyol, A.A. and Ekincioglu, E.E., 2010. GPR Research at the Tomb of Zeynel Bey in Hasankeyf Ancient City Southeastern Turkey. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR 2010, Lecce, Italy
  14. Kadioglu, S., Kadioglu, Y.K. and Akyol, A.A., 2011. Monitoring buried remains with a transparent 3D half bird’s eye view of ground penetrating radar data in the Zeynel Bey tomb in the ancient city of Hasankeyf, Turkey. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 8 (3), S61–S75
  15. Kim, J.-H., Cho, S.-J, and Yi, M.-J., 2007. Removal of ringing noise in GPR data by signal processing. Geosciences Journal, 11 (1), 75 – 81
  16. Koşay, H.Z., 1938. Alaca Höyük hafriyatı. 1936’daki çalışmalara ve keşiflere ait ilk rapor Ankara: Türk Tarihi Kurumu (In Turkish)
  17. Koşay, H.Z. and Akok, M., 1966. Türk Tarih Kurumu Tarafından Alaca Höyük Kazısı 1940-1948 deki Çalışmalara ve Keşiflere Ait İlk Rapor. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu (In Turkish).
  18. Leucci, G. and Negri, S., 2006. Use of ground penetrating radar to map subsurface archaeological features in an urban area. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 502–512.
  19. Leckebusch, J., Weibel, A., and Böhler, F., 2008. Semi-automatic feature extraction from GPR data. Near Surface Geophysics, 6 (2), 75–8
  20. Malagodi, S., Orlando, L., Piro, S., Rosso, F., 1996. Location of archaeological structures using GPR method: three-dimensional data acquisition and radar signal processing. Archaeological Prospection, 3, 13-23
  21. Moscatelli, M., Piscitelli, S., Piro, S., Stigliano, F., Giocoli,A., Zamuner, D. and Marconi, F. 2014. Integrated geological and geophysical investigations to characterize the anthropic layer of the Palatine hill and Roman Forum (Rome, Italy). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12, 1319–1338
  22. Negri, S., Leucci, G. and Mazzone, F., 2008. High resolution 3D ERT to help GPR data interpretation for researching archaeological items in a geologically complex subsurface. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 65, 111–120.
  23. Orlando L., 2005. Joint interpretation of geophysical data for archaeology. A case study. Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications, 6 (2), 235–250.
  24. Orlando L., 2007. Georadar data collection, anomaly shape and archaeological interpretation- a case study from central Italy. Archaeological Prospection, 14, 213–225.
  25. Orlando L., 2013. GPR to constrain ERT data inversion in cavity searching: theoretical and practical applications in archeology. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 89, 35–47.
  26. Piro, S., Goodman D., Nishimura Y., 2001. Delocation of Emperor Traiano’s villa (Altopiani di Arcinazzo Roma) using high resolution GPR surveys. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 43 (1–2), 143–155.
  27. Porsani. J.L., Jangelme, J. M. and Kipnis, R., 2010. GPR survey at Lapa do Santo archaeological site, Lagoa Santa karstic region, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 1141–1148
  28. Rizzo, E., Chianese, D. and Lapenna, V., 2005. Magnetic, GPR and geoelectrical measurements for studying the archaeological site of ‘Masseria Nigro’ (Viggiano, southern Italy). Near Surface Geophysics, 3 (1), 13–19.
  29. Sandmeier K. J. 2015. Reflexw 7.2.2 manual, Sandmeier Software, Zipser Strabe 1, D-76227 Karlsruhe, Germany
  30. Seren, A., Gelisli, K. and Catakli, A., 2008. A Geophysical Investigation of the Late Roman Underground Settlement at Aydintepe, Northeast Turkey. Geoarchaeology, 23 (6), 842- 860.
  31. Seren, A., Gelisli, K., Acikgoz, A.D. and Erkul, S., 2010. Georadar investigation of graves and wall remains in Alacahöyük, Central Anatolia, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR 2010, Lecce, Italy.
  32. Shaaban, F.A., Abbas, A.M., Atya, M.A. and Hafez, M.A., 2009. Ground-penetrating Radar exploration for ancient monuments at the valley of mummies -kilo 6, Bahariya Oasis, Egypt, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 68 (2), 194- 202
  33. Tsokas, G.N., Vargemezis, G., Tsourlos, P., Stambolidis, A., Fikos, I., Tassis, G. and Daskalakis, S., 2009. Geophysical investigations at the acropolis of ancient eleon (modern arma) in Eastern Boeotia, Report, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Geology Department of Geophysics Laboratory of Exploration Geophysics, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  34. Yalciner, C.Ç., Bano, M., Kadioglu, M., Karabacak, V., Meghraoui, M.and Altunel, E., 2009. New temple discovery at the archaeological site of Nysa (Western Turkey) using GPR method. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 1680–1689.
  35. Wilchek, L., 2000. Ground Penetrating Radar for Detection of Rock Structure, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, 285.