KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1

PROSOCIAL AND ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIORS OF ATHLETES IN MARTIAL ARTS

İbrahim Koçak(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0001-8442-4414
Gülfem Sezen Balçıkanlı(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0006-2856
Sayfa
27–40
Yayın Tarihi
2024-03-25
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, it was found that the prosocial and antisocial behaviors of martial art athletes differed depending on the variables of gender, nationality, having practiced sports with a license for 6 years or longer, sports type, and educational status, but there was no significant difference in terms of age and belt level of athletes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to investigate martial art athletes' prosocial and antisocial behaviors (judo, taekwondo, and kickboxing) and determine the differences.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study group consists of a total of 394 athletes aged 14-23 from judo (n=94), taekwondo (n=150), and kickboxing (n=150), who were selected through purposive sampling among the athletes who participated in the tournaments held throughout Ankara and had various regional, national, or international degrees.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, it was found that the prosocial and antisocial behaviors of martial art athletes differed depending on the variables of gender, nationality, having practiced sports with a license for 6 years or longer, sports type, and educational status, but there was no significant difference in terms of age and belt level of athletes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Sports · prosocial behavior · antisocial behavior

Özet

This study aims to investigate martial art athletes' prosocial and antisocial behaviors (judo, taekwondo, and kickboxing) and determine the differences. The study group consists of a total of 394 athletes aged 14-23 from judo (n=94), taekwondo (n=150), and kickboxing (n=150), who were selected through purposive sampling among the athletes who participated in the tournaments held throughout Ankara and had various regional, national, or international degrees. The Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS), developed by Kavussanu and Boardley (2009) and translated into Turkish by Sezen Balçıkanlı (2013), was used to collect data. A t-test, one-way ANOVA analysis, and post-hoc Tukey test were conducted in the research analysis. As a result, it was found that the prosocial and antisocial behaviors of martial art athletes differed depending on the variables of gender, nationality, having practiced sports with a license for 6 years or longer, sports type, and educational status, but there was no significant difference in terms of age and belt level of athletes.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate martial art athletes' prosocial and antisocial behaviors (judo, taekwondo, and kickboxing) and determine the differences. The study group consists of a total of 394 athletes aged 14-23 from judo (n=94), taekwondo (n=150), and kickboxing (n=150), who were selected through purposive sampling among the athletes who participated in the tournaments held throughout Ankara and had various regional, national, or international degrees. The Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale (PABSS), developed by Kavussanu and Boardley (2009) and translated into Turkish by Sezen Balçıkanlı (2013), was used to collect data. A t-test, one-way ANOVA analysis, and post-hoc Tukey test were conducted in the research analysis. As a result, it was found that the prosocial and antisocial behaviors of martial art athletes differed depending on the variables of gender, nationality, having practiced sports with a license for 6 years or longer, sports type, and educational status, but there was no significant difference in terms of age and belt level of athletes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Koçak, İ., Balçıkanlı, G. S. (2024). PROSOCIAL AND ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIORS OF ATHLETES IN MARTIAL ARTS. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.1364772

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (52)

  1. Acar, K., Mor, H., Karakaş, F., Yilmaz, A. K., Arslanoglu, C., & Mor, A. (2022). Prosocial and antisocial behaviors in Turkish female and male football players. Journal of Men’s Health, 18(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.31083/jomh.2021.062
  2. Alemdağ, S. (2018). Genç futbolcuların prososyal ve antisosyal davranışlarının incelenmesi. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.394766
  3. Alemdağ, S. (2019). Investigation of prosocial and antisocial behaviors of young athletes in terms of moral decision making attitudes. Pedagogics, Psychology, Medical-Biological Problems of Physical Training and Sports, 23(3), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.15561/18189172.2019.0301
  4. Altın, M., & Özsarı, A. (2017). The moral decision making attitudes of the athletes attending to sport training centers. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies, 3(1), 133-145.
  5. Balçıkanlı, G. S., & Yıldıran, İ. (2018). Elit salon hokeyi oyuncularında empatik beceri ile prososyal davranışlar arasındaki ilişki. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(1), Art. 1.
  6. Balçıkanlı, G. S., Gülşen, K., & Yildiran, İ. (2017). Kadın futbolcularda sportmenlik yönelimi. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(1-4), 9.
  7. Balçıkanlı, G. S., & Yildiran, İ. (2011). Profesyonel futbolcuların sportmenlik yönelimleri ve empatik eğilim düzeyleri. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000199
  8. Bandura, A. (1991). Handbook of moral behavior and development. In W. M. Kurtinez & J. L. Gewirtz (Ed.), Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action (Vol. 1, pp. 45-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  9. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of ınhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
  10. Boardley, I. D., & Kavussanu, M. (2009). The influence of social variables and moral disengagement on prosocial and antisocial behaviours in field hockey and netball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(8), 843-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410902887283
  11. Bortoli, L., Messina, G., Zorba, M., & Robazza, C. (2012). Contextual and individual influences on antisocial behaviour and psychobiosocial states of youth soccer players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(4), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.01.001
  12. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (18. bs). Pegem Akademi.
  13. Canlı, T., Canlı, U., & Taşkın, C. (2021). Altyapı sporcularının antrenör-sporcu ilişkilerinin ahlaki karar alma tutumlarına etkisinin belirlenmesi. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.33459/cbubesbd.925805
  14. Carreres-Ponsoda, F., Carbonell, A. E., Cortell, J. M., Fuster-Lloret, V., & Andreu-Cabrera, E. (2012). The relationship between out-of-school sport participation and positive youth development. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 7(3), 671-683.
  15. Cherepkova, E. V., Maksimov, V. N., Kushnarev, A. P., Shakhmatov, I. I., & Aftanas, L. I. (2019). The polymorphism of dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) and dopamine transporter (DAT) genes in the men with antisocial behaviour and mixed martial arts fighters. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 20(5), 402-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2017.1366056
  16. Çar, B., & Sezen Balçıkanlı, G. (2021). Türkiye fair play ödüllerinin formal ve informal fair play davranışları çerçevesinde incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 116-135. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.872206
  17. Danioni, F., & Barni, D. (2019). The relations between adolescents’ personal values and prosocial and antisocial behaviours in team sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(5), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2017.1367951
  18. Eisenberg, N., Damon, W., & Lerner, R. M. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of child psychology, social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed, C. 3). John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Endresen, I. M., & Olweus, D. (2005). Participation in power sports and antisocial involvement in preadolescent and adolescent boys. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(5), 468-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.00414.x
  21. Görgülü, R., Adi̇loğulları, G. E., Tosun, Ö. M., & Adi̇loğulları, İ. (2018). Prososyal ve antisosyal davranış ile sporcu kimliğinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(3), Art. 3. https://doi.org/10.17155/omuspd.397248
  22. Greif, E. B., & Hogan, R. (1973). The theory and measurement of empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20(3), 280-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034488
  23. Guivernau, M., & Duda, J. L. (2002). Moral atmosphere and athletic aggressive tendencies in young soccer players. Journal of Moral Education, 31(1), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240120111445
  24. Karakaya, İ. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. A. Tanrıöğen (Edt.) Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Anı.
  25. Kavussanu, M. (2006). Motivational predictors of prosocial and antisocial behaviour in football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(6), 575-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500190825
  26. Kavussanu, M. (2008). Moral behaviour in sport: A critical review of the literature. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840802277417
  27. Kavussanu, M., Boardley, I. D. (2009). The prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31(1), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.1.97
  28. Kavussanu, M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). Participation in sport and moral functioning: Does ego orientation mediate their relationship? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25(4), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.25.4.501
  29. Kavussanu, M., Seal, A. R., & Phillips, D. R. (2006). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male soccer teams: Age differences across adolescence and the role of motivational variables. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18(4), 326-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200600944108
  30. Koçak, İ., & Balçıkanlı, G. S. (2021). Savunma sporları ve empati: Elit sporcularda empati becerilerinin incelenmesi. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(2), Art. 2.
  31. Latorre Román, P., Bueno-Cruz, M., Martínez-Redondo, M., & Sánchez, J. (2020). Prosocial and antisocial behaviour in school sports. Apunts Educación Física y Deportes, 1(139), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2020/1).139.02
  32. Malete, L., Chow, G. M., & Feltz, D. L. (2013). Influence of coaching efficacy and coaching competency on athlete-level moral variables in Botswana youth soccer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(10), 2107-2119. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12164
  33. Manfred, B. (1979). Judokurs, training, technik, taktik: Reinbek. 4 İnternational Congress on judo.
  34. Micai, M., Kavussanu, M., & Ring, C. (2015). Executive function is associated with antisocial behavior and aggression in athletes. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37(5), 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0021
  35. Miller, B. W., Roberts, G. C., & Ommundsen, Y. (2005). Effect of perceived motivational climate on moral functioning, team moral atmosphere perceptions, and the legitimacy of intentionally injurious acts among competitive youth football players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 461-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.04.003
  36. Orhan, S., & Salman, M. N. (2021). Genç futbolcularda antrenör-sporcu ilişkisinin ahlaki karar alma tutumları ile prososyal ve antisosyal davranışlarla ilişkisi. Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(8-3), 334-355. https://doi.org/10.33468/sbsebd.239
  37. Özbek, O., & Nalbant, U. (2016). Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’ndeki genç sporcuların ahlaki karar alma tutumları (p. 14). Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, Antalya.
  38. Özdemir, İ. (2020). Takım sporları ile uğraşan yetişkin sporcuların prososyal ve antisosyal davranışlarının belirlenmesinde mükemmeliyetçilik ve başarı hedeflerinin rolü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/282381
  39. Parise, M., Pagani, A. F., Cremascoli, V., & Iafrate, R. (2015). Rugby, self-perception and prosocial behaviour: Evidence from the italian “rugby Project for schools”. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia Del Ejercicio y El Deporte, 10(1), 57-61.
  40. Rutten, E. A., Stams, G. J. J. M., Biesta, G. J. J., Schuengel, C., Dirks, E., & Hoeksma, J. B. (2007). The contribution of organized youth sport to antisocial and prosocial behavior in adolescent athletes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9085-y
  41. Sagar, S. S., Boardley, I. D., & Kavussanu, M. (2011). Fear of failure and student athletes’ interpersonal antisocial behaviour in education and sport. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(Pt 3), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1348/2044-8279.002001
  42. Sezen Balçıkanlı, G. (2013). The Turkish adaptation of the prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale (PABSS). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(18), 271-276.
  43. Sezen Balçıkanlı, G. (2022). Fair play eğitimi: Etkinlikler-oyunlar. Pelin Ofset.
  44. Sezen Balçıkanlı, G., & Yildiran, İ. (2012). Sportspersonship orientation and empathy: A study of professional football players. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 12(1), 18-24.
  45. Sezen, G., & Yildiran, İ. (2007). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin futbolda fair play’e ilişkin olumlu ve olumsuz davranışlara yaklaşımlarının incelenmesi. Spor Yönetimi ve Bilgi Teknolojileri, 2(1), Art. 1.
  46. Shogan, D. (2007). Sport ethics in context. Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
  47. Şahinler, Y. (2022). Investigation of prosocial and antisocial behavior tendencies of team athletes according to different variables. Research in Sport Education, 24(2), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.5152/JPESS.2022.1004870
  48. Şinoforoğlu, T., & Sezen Balçıkanlı, G. (2020). Sportspersonshıp coachıng behavıors from youth athletes’ perspectıve. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 14, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.13.4.16947
  49. Traclet, A., Romand, P., Moret, O., & Kavussanu, M. (2011). Antisocial behavior in soccer: A qualitative study of moral disengagement. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 9(2), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2011.567105
  50. Van de Pol, P. K. C., Kavussanu, M., & Claessens, B. (2020). Moral functioning across training and competition in sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(2), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2018.1511623
  51. Yarayan, Y. E., Yildiz, A. B., Gülşen, D. B. A., & İlhan, L. (2020). Futbolculuk seviyesi prososyal ve antisosyal davranışların bir belirleyicisi midir? Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(4), Art. 4. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.679950
  52. Yıldız, M., Şenel, E., & Şahan, H. (2015). The relationship between prosocial and antisocial behaviors in sport, general self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy: Study in department of physical education and sport teacher education. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), 1273-1278. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v12i2.3202