KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2000 / Volume: 1 Issue: 3

-

The Frequency of Phimosis in Patients Who Underwent Circumcision

Barış Altay
İzzet Koçak
Oktay Nazlı
Adnan Şimşir
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2000-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

-

Abstract

Objective: To establish the frequency and importance of pathological phimosis in children who underwent circumcision. Material and Methods: A review of the frequency and importance of phimosis was performed in 490 children who underwent circumcision between January 1994 and August 2000 at our clinic. The frequency of phimosis according to age groups was evaluated. Results: Overall 34 (% 6.93) children had typical phimosis before circumcision. Furthermore among the 490 patients, 3 (%0.6) had unilateral hydroceles, 2 (%0.4) had anterior hypospadias and 2 (%0.4) had unilateral cryptorchidism. The frequency of phimosis decreased gradually in older groups. Conclusion: In this study, we determined a higher frequency of phimosis in children between ages 0-3. The frequency decreased with age. For this reason, topical therapy should be administered before 3 years of age and circumcision should be reserved for patients who have infection or do not respond to medical therapy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Altay, B., Koçak, İ., Nazlı, O., Şimşir, A. (2000). -. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 1 Issue: 3. https://ajindex.com/articles/1291482

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Büyükalpelli R, Sarýkaya Þ, Aþçý R. Phimosis and circumcision in children. Eur Urol 1999; 35:1-9.
  2. Chu CC, Chen KC, Diau GY. Topical steroid treatment of Phimosis in boys. J Urol 1999; 162: 861-3.
  3. Kayaba H, Tamura H, Kitajima S, Fujiwara Y, KatoT, Kato T. Analysis of shape and retractibility of the prepuce in 603 Japanese boys. J Urol 1996; 156: 1813- 55.
  4. Ponsky LE, Ross JH, Knipper N, Kay R. Penile adhesions after neonatal circumcision. J Urol 2000; 164: 495-6.
  5. Dewan PA, Tieu HC, Chieng BS. Phimosis: Is circumcision necessary? J Pediatr Child Health 1996; 32: 285-9.
  6. Shankar KR, Rickwood AM. The incidence of phimosis in boys. BJU Int 1999; 84:101-2.
  7. Eskala JM, Tickwood AMK. Balanitis. Br J Urol 1989; 63: 196-7.
  8. Forte A, Palumbo P, Baumgartner IM et al. Local anaesthesia with eutectic cream of lidocaine and prilocaine for treatment of cicatrizial phimosis in outpatients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 1998; 2, 56: 207-8.
  9. Yanagisawa N, Baba K, Yamagoe M, Iwamato T. Conservative treatment of childhood fimosis with topical conjugated equine oestrogen ointment. Int J Urol 2000; 7, 1: 1-3.
  10. Mansour MA, Rabinovitch HH, Dean GE. Medical management of phimosis in children; Our experience with topical steroids. J Urol 1999; 162: 1162-4.
  11. Orsola A, Caffaratti J, Garat M. Conservative treatment of Phimosis in children using a topical steroid. Urology 2000; 2, 56: 307-10.