KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 3

Dentin Çürüğü Restorasyonlarında Biodentine, Cam İyonomer Siman ve Kompozit Rezin ile Oluşan Mikrosızıntının Karşılaştırılması

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Biodentine, Glass Ionomer Cement, and Composite Resin Used for Dentin Restoration: An In Vitro Study

Elif Kuru(UŞAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0396-7677
Nesrin Eronat(EGE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, DENTISTRY PR.)0000-0002-1675-5091
Murat Turkun(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ PR.)0000-0001-7405-1677
Dilşah Çoğulu(EGE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY)0000-0002-3156-9801
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç: Biodentine, cam iyonomer simana kıyasla anlamlı derecede daha düşük mikrosızıntı göstermiş ve koronal dentin kavitelerinde kompozit rezin ile benzer sızdırmazlık performansı sergilemiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, koronal dentin kavitelerinde kalsiyum silikat esaslı bir materyal (Biodentine) ile cam iyonomer siman (GIC) ve kompozit rezin ile yapılan restorasyonların mikrosızıntı açısından değerlendirilmesi ve karşılaştırılmasıdır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Standartize dentin kaviteleri (4×2×2 mm) hazırlandı ve örnekler rastgele üç gruba ayrıldı (her biri için n=20): Biodentine, GIC (Fuji IX) ve kompozit rezin (Clearfil SE Bond + Filtek Z250).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç: Biodentine, cam iyonomer simana kıyasla anlamlı derecede daha düşük mikrosızıntı göstermiş ve koronal dentin kavitelerinde kompozit rezin ile benzer sızdırmazlık performansı sergilemiştir.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dental Leakage · Calcium Silicate · Glass Ionomer Cements

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, koronal dentin kavitelerinde kalsiyum silikat esaslı bir materyal (Biodentine) ile cam iyonomer siman (GIC) ve kompozit rezin ile yapılan restorasyonların mikrosızıntı açısından değerlendirilmesi ve karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Altmış adet çekilmiş insan üçüncü molar dişi kullanıldı. Standartize dentin kaviteleri (4×2×2 mm) hazırlandı ve örnekler rastgele üç gruba ayrıldı (her biri için n=20): Biodentine, GIC (Fuji IX) ve kompozit rezin (Clearfil SE Bond + Filtek Z250). Restorasyonların ardından tüm örneklere 3000 termal döngü uygulandı. Mikrosızıntı, %0,5 bazik fuksin boya penetrasyonu yöntemiyle değerlendirildi ve stereomikroskop altında skorlandı. Veriler Kruskal–Wallis ve Bonferroni post hoc testleri ile analiz edildi (p 0,05). Sonuç: Biodentine, cam iyonomer simana kıyasla anlamlı derecede daha düşük mikrosızıntı göstermiş ve koronal dentin kavitelerinde kompozit rezin ile benzer sızdırmazlık performansı sergilemiştir.

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the microleakage of a calcium silicate–based material (Biodentine) with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and composite resin in standardized coronal dentin cavities in-vitro. Materials and methods: Sixty extracted human third molars were used. Standardized dentin cavities (4×2×2 mm) were prepared and randomly assigned to three groups (n=20 of each): Biodentine, GIC (Fuji IX), and composite resin (Clearfil SE Bond + Filtek Z250). Following restoration, all specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours and subjected to 3000 thermal cycles. Microleakage was assessed after 0.5% basic fuchsin dye penetration and scoring under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Bonferroni post hoc tests (p 0.05). Conclusion: Biodentine demonstrated significantly lower microleakage compared with glass ionomer cement and comparable sealing performance to composite resin in coronal dentin cavities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kuru, E., Eronat, N., Turkun, M., Çoğulu, D. (2026). Dentin Çürüğü Restorasyonlarında Biodentine, Cam İyonomer Siman ve Kompozit Rezin ile Oluşan Mikrosızıntının Karşılaştırılması. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Volume: 27 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1925907

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (41)

  1. Auschill TM, Koch CA, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, Arweiler NB. Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009;34:3–10. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-7.
  2. Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent. 1976;4:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(76)90048-8.
  3. Raskin A, Eschrich G, Dejou J, About I. In vitro microleakage of Biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to Fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14:535–542. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a25690.
  4. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23:343–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022.
  5. Ferracane JL, Cooper PR, Smith AJ. Can interaction of materials with the dentin-pulp complex contribute to dentin regeneration? Odontology. 2010;98:2–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-009-0116-5.
  6. Zhu K, Zheng L, Xing J, Chen S, Chen R, Ren L. Mechanical, antibacterial, biocompatible and microleakage evaluation of glass ionomer cement modified by nanohydroxyapatite/polyhexamethylene biguanide. Dent Mater J. 2022;41:197–208. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-096.
  7. Kuru E, Eronat N, Türkün M, et al. Comparison of remineralization ability of tricalcium silicate and glass ionomer cement on residual dentin: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:732. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04475-4.
  8. Jefferies SR. Bioactive and biomimetic restorative materials: a comprehensive review. Part I. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12069.
  9. Dawood AE, Parashos P, Wong RHK, Reynolds EC, Manton DJ. Calcium silicate-based cements: composition, properties, and clinical applications. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017;8:e12195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12195.
  10. Koubi G, Colon P, Franquin JC, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure MO, et al. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth: a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0701-9.
  11. Komabayashi T, Colmenar D, Cvach N, Bhat A, Primus C, Imai Y. Comprehensive review of current endodontic sealers. Dent Mater J. 2020;39:703–720. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-288.
  12. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
  13. Albeshti R, Shahid S. Evaluation of microleakage in Zirconomer: a zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer cement. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018;52:97–104. https://doi.org/10.15644/asc52/2/2.
  14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
  15. Atmeh AR, Chong EZ, Richard G, Festy F, Watson TF. Dentin-cement interfacial interaction: calcium silicates and polyalkenoates. J Dent Res. 2012;91:454–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512443068.
  16. Bani M, Sungurtekin-Ekçi E, Odabaş ME. Efficacy of Biodentine as an apical plug in nonvital permanent teeth with open apices: an in vitro study. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:359275. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/359275.
  17. El-Khodary HM, Farsi DJ, Farsi NM, Zidan AZ. Sealing ability of four calcium-containing cements used for repairing furcal perforations in primary molars: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16:733–739. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1749.
  18. Raju VG, Venumbaka NR, Mungara J, Vijayakumar P, Rajendran S, Elangovan A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radiopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32:304–310. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.140952.
  19. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020.
  20. Malkondu Ö, Karapinar Kazandağ M, Kazazoğlu E. A review on Biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:160951. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/160951.
  21. Nowicka A, Lipski M, Parafiniuk M, Sporniak-Tutak K, Lichota D, Kosierkiewicz A, et al. Response of human dental pulp capped with Biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2013;39:743–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.005.
  22. Saber AM, El-Housseiny AA, Alamoudi NM. Atraumatic restorative treatment and interim therapeutic restoration: a review of the literature. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7010028.
  23. Duncan HF, Galler KM, Tomson PL, Simon S, El-Karim I, Kundzina R, et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int Endod J. 2019;52:923–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13128.
  24. Bani M, Aktaş N, Çınar Ç, Odabaş ME. The clinical and radiographic success of primary molar pulpotomy using Biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate: a 24-month randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39:284–288.
  25. Awawdeh L, Al-Qudah A, Hamouri H, Chakra RJ. Outcomes of vital pulp therapy using mineral trioxide aggregate or Biodentine: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2018;44:1603–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.004.
  26. Martens LC, Cauwels RGEC, Van Acker JWG, Joshi KR, Hanet PN, Rajasekharan S. Biodentine as a temporary filling in deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a prospective observational 33-month follow-up study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024;25:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-024-00869-8.
  27. Hayes M, da Mata C, Tada S, Cole M, McKenna G, Burke FM, Allen PF. Evaluation of Biodentine in the restoration of root caries: a randomized controlled trial. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2016;1:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084416628474.
  28. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent. 1997;22:173–185.
  29. Nicholson JW. Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018;4:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2018.1497492.
  30. Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ. Polymerization stress—is it clinically meaningful? Dent Mater. 2016;32:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.020.
  31. Talabani RM, Garib BT, Masaeli R. Bioactivity and physicochemical properties of three calcium silicate-based cements: an in vitro study. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:9576930. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9576930.
  32. Dülger K, Koşar T. Comparison of three dentine replacement materials in terms of different characteristics. Aust Endod J. 2025;51:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12908.
  33. Akbulut MB, Mutlu ŞN, Soylu MA, Şimşek E. Interfacial characteristics of BIOfactor MTA and Biodentine with dentin. Microsc Res Tech. 2023;86:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24267.
  34. Mustafa R, Alshali RZ, Silikas N. The effect of desiccation on water sorption, solubility and hygroscopic volumetric expansion of dentine replacement materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34:e205–e213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.012.
  35. Arthilakshmi, Vishnurekha C, Annamalai S, Baghkomeh PN, Sharmin DD. Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29:744–748. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_490_17.
  36. Camilleri J. Investigation of Biodentine as dentine replacement material. J Dent. 2013;41:600–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.05.003.
  37. Niranjan B, Shashikiran ND, Maran S, et al. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016;34:324–330. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.191410.
  38. Patel C, Patel M, Panchal M, Bhatt R, Patel F, Makwani D. Evaluation of microleakage and shear bond strength of two different calcium-based silicate indirect pulp-capping agents when restored with glass ionomer cement and composite resin restoration: a comparative in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024;17:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2887.
  39. Chaweewannakorn W, Karuna C, Kasemsook N, Kittithummaroj W, Chinajitphan N, Dhanesuan N, Youcharoen K. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in a tricalcium silicate-based cement matured for 12 min or 24 h and covered with glass ionomer cement or resin composite. J Oral Sci. 2026;68:93–98. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.25-0236.
  40. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2.
  41. Weerakoon AT, Cooper C, Meyers IA, Condon N, Sexton C, Thomson D, Ford PJ, Symons AL. Does dentine mineral change with anatomical location, microscopic site and patient age? J Struct Biol X. 2022;6:100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjsbx.2022.100060