KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3

Ergenlerde İnternet Özgeciliğini Artırmaya Yönelik Grup Psikoeğitiminin Geliştirilmesi ve Etkililiğinin İncelenmesi

Development and Investigation of the Effectiveness of Group Psychoeducation in Increasing Internet Altruism Among Adolescents

Sümeyye Bilgiz Akbayır(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5373-9712
Adem Peker(Atatürk Üniversitesi)0000-0002-3594-9166
Sayfa
794–813
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-22
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu sonuçlar, geliştirilen programın ergenlerde internet özgeciliğini artırmada etkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu araştırmanın amacı, internet özgeciliği grup psikoeğitim programının ergenlerin internet özgeciliği düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çalışma, 2022–2023 eğitim-öğretim yılında Anadolu Lisesinde öğrenim gören gönüllü 10. sınıf öğrencileriyle yürütülmüştür.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu sonuçlar, geliştirilen programın ergenlerde internet özgeciliğini artırmada etkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2022–2023 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:internet özgeciliği · özgecilik · ergen

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, internet özgeciliği grup psikoeğitim programının ergenlerin internet özgeciliği düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Çalışma, 2022–2023 eğitim-öğretim yılında Anadolu Lisesinde öğrenim gören gönüllü 10. sınıf öğrencileriyle yürütülmüştür. Araştırma, 2x3’lük split-plot deseni (deney ve kontrol gruplu × ön test – son test – izleme testi) ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler, ‘Kişisel Bilgi Formu’ ve ‘İnternet Özgeciliği Ölçeği’ ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen dokuz oturumluk internet özgeciliği psikoeğitim programı, deney grubundaki 11 öğrenciye dokuz hafta boyunca uygulanmıştır. Her oturum yaklaşık 80–90 dakika sürmüştür. Veriler, iki faktörlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, grup psikoeğitimi uygulanan deney grubundaki ergenlerin son testteki internet özgeciliği puanlarının, kontrol grubuna kıyasla anlamlı düzeyde yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, programın olumlu etkisinin izleme testinde de sürdüğü belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar, geliştirilen programın ergenlerde internet özgeciliğini artırmada etkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of an internet altruism group psychoeducation program on adolescents' levels of internet altruism. The study was conducted with 10th-grade students who volunteered to participate and were enrolled at Anadolu High School during the 2022–2023 academic year. The study employed a 2x3 split-plot experimental design (experimental and control groups × pretest, posttest, and follow-up test). Data were collected using the ‘Personal Information Form’ and the ‘Internet Altruism Scale’. The nine-session internet altruism psychoeducation program developed by the researchers was applied to 11 students in the experimental group over a period of nine weeks. Each session lasted approximately 80 to 90 minutes. The data were analysed using two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). The analysis revealed that the internet altruism scores of adolescents in the experimental group who underwent group psychoeducation were significantly higher than those in the control group in the final test. In addition, the positive effect of the program was found to persist in the follow-up test. These results demonstrate that the program developed is effective in increasing internet self-esteem in adolescents.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akbayır, S. B., Peker, A. (2025). Ergenlerde İnternet Özgeciliğini Artırmaya Yönelik Grup Psikoeğitiminin Geliştirilmesi ve Etkililiğinin İncelenmesi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 3, 794–813. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.1574005

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (87)

  1. Abraham, F., & Babu, K. (2021). Altruism and self-efficacy among young adults. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 9(2), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.25215/0902.022
  2. Ahn, S. J., Le, A. M. T., & Bailenson, J. (2013). The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology, 16(1), 7–38.
  3. Amichai Hamburger, Y., & Furnham, A. (2007). The positive net. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(2), 1033–1045. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.008
  4. Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2015). ‘Can I afford to help?’How affordances of communication modalities guide bystanders' helping intentions towards harassment on social network sites. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(4), 425-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.983979
  5. Bermond, A. (2019). Altruism norms. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 1–3.
  6. Bierhoff, H. W. (2010). Psychologie prosozialen Verhaltens: Warum wir anderen helfen. Kohlhammer
  7. Bilgiz Akbayır, S., & Peker, A. (2023). Ergenlere yönelik “İnternet Özgeciliği” ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Ege Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.58637/egebad.1380029
  8. Borca, G., Bina, M., Keller, P., Gilbert, L., & Begotti, T. (2015). Internet use and developmental tasks: Adolescents' point of view. Computer and Human Behaviours, 52, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.029.
  9. Branje, S. (2021). Adolescent identity development in context. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.11.006.
  10. Büssing, A., Kerksieck, P., Günther, A., & Baumann, K. (2013). Altruism in adolescents and young adults: Validation of an instrument to measure generative altruism with structural equation modeling. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 18(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2013.849661
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (23. baskı). Pegem Akademi
  12. Caprara, G. V., Kanacri, B. P. L., Gerbino, M., Zuffiano, A., Alessandri, G., Vecchio, G.,. & Bridglall, B. (2014). Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: Evidence from a school-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414531464
  13. Cascio, C. N., Selkie, E., & Moreno, M. A. (2023). Effect of technology and digital media use on adolescent health and development: Protocol for a multimethod longitudinal study. JMIR Research Protocols, 12(1), e50984.
  14. Chaikovska, O., Holovach, T., Melnyk, L., & Kuzo, L. (2020). Prosocial behaviour of teenagers and adolescents: concepts and tendencies. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education, 12(1), 226-243. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/211
  15. Chen, H. (2024). The psychological mechanism of internet altruistic behavior transmission: A givers and recipients perspective. Current Psychology, 43, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06979-2
  16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Crocetti, E. (2017). Identity formation in adolescence: The dynamic of forming and consolidating ıdentity commitments. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/CDEP.12226.
  18. Çivitci, A. (2023). Grup psikoeğitimi. Pegem Akademi
  19. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (3. baskı). Pegem Akademi
  20. Doğru-Çabuker, N., & Ersanlı, K. (2016, 5-7 Mayıs). Diğerkâmlık becerisi psikoeğitim programının üniversite öğrencilerinin diğerkâmlık düzeylerine etkisi [Bildiri sunumu]. Vl. Uluslararası Canik Sempozyumu, Samsun.
  21. Fariz, S. (2022). Pozitif psikoloji temelli psiko-eğitim programının ergenlerde öznel iyi oluş ve dijital oyun bağımlılığına etkisi [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Sakarya Üniversitesi.
  22. Flores, M. L. M. (2022). Cooperative games and prosocial reasoning in children: Effects of an intervention program. Psychology and Mental Health Care, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/157
  23. Ghobadi-Isfarjani, H. K., Sharifi, T., Ghazanfari, A., & Charami, M. (2022). The efficacy of psychosocial group training empowerment on altruism and social adjustment of female high school students. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), 141–147.
  24. Günor, R. B. (2014). Modern ahlak felsefesinde özgecilik [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
  25. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe yöntem-analiz. Seçkin Yayınları.
  26. Han, L., Xu, J., Bian, Y., Gao, F., & Ren, Y. (2016). Effects of problem characteristics on the online helping behavior of shy individuals. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 531-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.056
  27. Hao, J., Liu, Y., Ma, X., & Gong, S. (2025). The effects of social mindfulness and online interpersonal trust on college students’ online prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1573345.
  28. Hu, Y., Zhang, T., Shi, H. F., & Fan, C. Y. (2023). Empathy and bystander helping behavior in cyberbullying among adolescents: the mediating role of internet moral judgment and the moderating role of internet self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1196571.
  29. Iwasa, Y., Hihara, S., Ishizaki, K., Yasui, G., Hiro, M., & Sugimura, K. (2023). Identity development and online and offline prosocial behaviors among early and middle adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1148347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1148347
  30. Jiang, J., Zhao, X., Li, Y., & Yao, Y. (2023). Relationship between empathy and Internet altruistic behavior of medical students: Mediating role of moral identity. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 48(11), 1585–1588. https://doi.org/10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.11.024
  31. Jorgenson, A. G., Hsiao, R. C. J., & Yen, C. F. (2016). Internet addiction and other behavioral addictions. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 25(3), 509-520; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2016.03.004
  32. Kasapoğlu, F. (2014). İyilik hali ile özgecilik arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Hikmet Yurdu Düşünce-Yorum Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi, 7(13), 271-288.
  33. Kaynak, S. (2018). Özgecilik. Ş. Işık (Ed.), Okulda pozitif psikoloji uygulamaları içinde (2. Baskı, s. 378-402). Pegem Akademi
  34. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  35. Levine, S. S. (2001, 28 December). Altruism in cyberspace: The voluntary sharing of goods online [Paper Proceedings]. EICAR Conference, Munich. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2165011
  36. Li, R. Y., Jiang, T., Yong, J., & Zhou, H. Y. (2018). College students’interpersonal relationship and empathy level predict internet altruistic behavior - empathy level and online social support as mediators. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20180701.11
  37. Lin, X. (2023). Effect of family functioning on ınternet altruistic behavior in college student: The mediating role of mental resilience. Advances in Psychology, 13(12), 5940–5954. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2023.1312755
  38. Lou, K., & Floridi, L. (2023). Online altruism: What it is and how it differs from other kinds of altruism. Minds & Machines,33(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-023-09648-8
  39. Lu, C., Liang, L., Chen, W., & Bian, Y. (2021). Do gifts of roses have a lingering fragrance? Evidence from altruistic interventions into adolescents’ subjective well-being. Journal of Adolescence, 86, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.11
  40. Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2009). Therapist's guide to positive psychological interventions. Academic Press.
  41. Melton, A. (2019). Sleep and digital altruism: Are good sleepers, good doers?. [Master's thesis]. Harvard Extension School USA.
  42. Meter, V., Birnbaum, M. L., Rizvi, A., & Kane, J. M. (2019). Online help-seeking prior to diagnosis: Can web-based resources reduce the duration of untreated mood disorders in young people? Journal of Affective Disorders, 252(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.019
  43. Mesurado, B., Distefano, M. J., Robiolo, G., & Richaud, M. C. (2019). The Hero program: Development and initial validation of an intervention program to promote prosocial behavior in adolescents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(8), 2566–2584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518793224
  44. Mesurado, B., Resett, S., Tezón, M., & Vanney, C. E. (2021). Do positive emotions make you more prosocial? Direct and indirect effects of an intervention program on prosociality in Colombian adolescents during social isolation due to COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 710037.
  45. Nedim Bal, P., & Topuz, C. (2015). Özgeciliği artırmaya yönelik psikoeğitim programının üniversite öğrencilerinin özgecilik düzeylerine etkisi. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 4(4), 206-216.
  46. Nie, T., Gui, Y., & Huang, Y. (2024). Online sharing behaviors driven by need for approval: the choice of individuals with low social intelligence and high gratitude?. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02535-8
  47. Özer-Özbal, G., & Gönen, M. (2023). Okul öncesi dönem çocuklarında empati ve prososyal davranışların geliştirilmesine yönelik deneysel bir araştırma. Eğitim ve Bilim, 48(215), 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2023.11103
  48. Özgözgü, S., Güneş, H., Alyaprak, A., Arıkan, M. F., Günay, B., & Kanay, A. (2024). Liselerde öğrenci devamsızlıklarının incelenmesi. Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 7(1), 63-95.
  49. Parlangeli, O., Marchigiani, E., Bracci, M., Duguid, A. M., Palmitesta, P., & Marti, P. (2019). Offensive acts and helping behavior on the internet: An analysis of the relationships between moral disengagement, empathy, and use of social media in a sample of Italian students. Work, 63(3), 469-477. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-192935
  50. Pastor, Y., Pérez-Torres, V., Thomas-Currás, H., Lobato-Rincón, L. L., López-Sáez, M. Á., & García, A. (2024). A study of the influence of altruism, social responsibility, reciprocity, and the subjective norm on online prosocial behavior in adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 154, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108156
  51. Pazer, S. (2024). The ımpact of social media use on ıdentity formation among adolescents. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 10(5), 299–304.
  52. Peng, P. H., Chen, Y. L., Hsiao, R. C., Yen, C. F., & Chou, W. J. (2024). Internet altruistic behaviors in adolescents: Roles of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, ımpulsiveness, and perceived social support. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060433
  53. Pfattheicher, S., Nielsen, Y. A., & Thielmann, I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 124-129.
  54. Pharris-Ciurej, N., Hirschman, C., & Willhoft, J. (2012). The 9th-grade shock and the high school dropout crisis. Social Science Research, 41(3), 709-730.
  55. Post, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It's good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine,12(2), 66–77.
  56. Radovanović, B. (2019). Altruism in behavioral, motivational, and evolutionary sense. Filozofija i Društvo, 30(1), 122-134.
  57. Rashid, S., & Seligman, M. (2018). Positive Psychotherapy: Clinician Manual. Oxford University Press
  58. Romersi, S., Fernández, J. R. M., & Roche, R. (2011). Efectos del programa mínimo de ıncremento prosocial en una muestra de estudiantes de educación secundaria. Annals of Psychology, 27(1), 135-146.
  59. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new Positive Psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press
  60. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14
  61. Smith, K., Holmes, K., Haski‐Leventhal, D., Cnaan, R. A., Handy, F., & Brudney, J. L. (2010). Motivations and benefits of student volunteering: comparing regular, occasional, and non‐volunteers in five countries. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 1(1), 65–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2010v1n1a2
  62. Soudi, S., & Aman, A. (2023). Online altruism and prosocial behavior in youth. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy, 11(4), 111-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.25215/1104.012
  63. Steinemann, S. T., Geelan, B. J., Zaehringer, S., Mutuura, K., Wolkow, E., Frasseck, L., & Opwis, K. (2020). Potentials and pitfalls of increasing prosocial behavior and self-efficacy over time using an online personalized platform. PloS One, 15(6), e0234422.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234422
  64. Suargani, G., Mulawarman, M., & Awalya, A. (2022). Single session counseling ıntegrated with expressive art to ımprove students internet altruistic behavior. Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling, 7(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.17977/um001v7i12022p29-35
  65. Sun, S. (2018). From defensive altruism to pathological altruism. Sage Open Journals, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018782585
  66. Ulusoy, M. A. (2020). Pozitif psikoloji temelli grup rehberliğinin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin yalan söyleme eğilimlerine ve benlik saygısına etkisi [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi.
  67. Wang, S., & Cao, C. (2022). Research on the relationship between belief in a just world and ınternet altruistic behavior of senior high school students. Advances in Social Sciences,11(6), 2242-2249. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2022.116306
  68. Wang, H., Wang, Y., Nie, J., & Lei, L. (2021). Family socioeconomic status and internet altruistic behavior among Chinese adolescents: The mediating effect of personal belief in a just world and emotional intelligence. Children and Youth Services Review, 121, 105841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105841
  69. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2009). The roots of human altruism. British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 455-471.
  70. Weiss-Sidi, M., & Riemer, H. (2023). Help others—be happy? The effect of altruistic behavior on happiness across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1156661.
  71. Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2011). The associations between young adults’ face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1959-1962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.019
  72. Yılmaz-Bingöl, T., & Uysal, R. (2015). Empati geliştirme grup rehberliği programının ilkokul ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinin empati düzeylerine etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 14(2), 430-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.90489
  73. Yöntem, M. K. (2015). Özgecilik. B. Ergüner Tekinalp & Ş. Işık Terzi (Ed.). Eğitimde pozitif psikoloji uygulamaları içinde (5. Baskı s. 319-357). Pegem Akademi.
  74. Yumei, X. (2020). Research on altruistic behavior of netizens from the perspective of network interpersonal interaction. Journal of Harbin University, 41(10), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-5856.2020.10.011
  75. Zhang, X., Zhao, Y., & Gao, X. (2019). Empathy and ınternet altruistic behavior: A moderated mediation model. Advances in Psychology, 9(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.10.12677/ap.2019.92029
  76. Zheng, X., Chen, H., Wang, Z., Xie, F., & Bao, Z. (2021a). Links between social class and internet altruistic behavior among undergraduates: Chain mediating role of moral identity and self-control. Current Psychology, 42, 9303–9311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02210-8
  77. Zheng, X., & Wang, Y. (2017). The relationship between ınternet altruistic behavior and subjective well-being among adolescents: A mediated moderation model. Psychological Science, 40(1), 70-75. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20170111
  78. Zheng, X., Wang, Y., & Xu, L. (2016). Internet altruistic behavior and subjective well-being: Self-efficacy as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An İnternational Journal, 44(9), 1575-1583. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.9.1575
  79. Zheng, X., Wang, Z., Chen, H., & Yang, L. (2021). Subjective social class and Internet altruistic behavior among Chinese college students: Mediating role of self-esteem. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 49(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9272
  80. Zheng, X., Wang, Z., Chen, H., & Xie, F. (2020). The relationship between self-esteem and internet altruistic behavior: The mediating effect of online social support and its gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 172, 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110588
  81. Zheng, X. L., & Zhao, W. (2015). The relationships among empathy, self-efficacy, and internet altruistic behavior. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 358–361. 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.02.039
  82. Zheng, X., Zhu, X., Zhou, X., Xie, F., & Huang, L. (2023). Internet altruistic motivation promotes internet altruistic behavior: A moderated mediation model. Current Psychology, 42(32), 28276–28284.
  83. Zhou, F., Lin, Y., & Mou, J. (2024). Virtual pets' cuteness matters: A shared reality paradigm for promoting internet helping behaviour. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123308
  84. Zhou, S., Leng, M., Zhang, J., Zhou, W., Lian, J., & Yang, H. (2024). Parental emotional warmth and adolescent internet altruism behavior: a moderated mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-10.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02870-4
  85. Zhu, Y., Shen, Y., & Zhao, Q. (2020). Self-presentation and adolescent altruistic behaviors in social networks. Hindawi Complexity, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1719564
  86. Bierhoff, H. W. (2010). Psychologie prosozialen Verhaltens: Warum wir anderen helfen. Kohlhammer
  87. Caprara, G. V., Kanacri, B. P. L., Gerbino, M., Zuffiano, A., Alessandri, G., Vecchio, G.,. & Bridglall, B. (2014). Positive effects of promoting prosocial behavior in early adolescence: Evidence from a school-based intervention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414531464