KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Addressing the socioemotional needs of Filipino gifted learners: A systematic review

Tyrone Gil(University of the Philippines)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This integrated approach is crucial for enabling gifted Filipino learners to overcome socioemotional barriers, realize their full potential, and contribute meaningfully to national development.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This systematic review examines the socioemotional challenges confronting gifted learners, with a specific focus on the unique experiences of Filipino gifted children.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:While exhibiting advanced cognitive abilities, these learners frequently face issues such as asynchronous development, maladaptive perfectionism, and underachievement, which can lead to emotional distress, social isolation, and a significant discrepancy between their potential and actual academic performance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This integrated approach is crucial for enabling gifted Filipino learners to overcome socioemotional barriers, realize their full potential, and contribute meaningfully to national development.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Gifted education · socioemotional development · perfectionism

Abstract

This systematic review examines the socioemotional challenges confronting gifted learners, with a specific focus on the unique experiences of Filipino gifted children. While exhibiting advanced cognitive abilities, these learners frequently face issues such as asynchronous development, maladaptive perfectionism, and underachievement, which can lead to emotional distress, social isolation, and a significant discrepancy between their potential and actual academic performance. The review highlights how cultural values in the Philippines—particularly the emphasis on academic success and family honor—can exacerbate these challenges, intensifying perfectionistic tendencies and contributing to the suppression of unique intellectual traits. Following PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical literature was systematically identified, screened, and synthesized to explore the manifestation of these issues within the Filipino context. Findings indicate a critical need for educational practices to move beyond mere academic enrichment and incorporate holistic socioemotional support. Key implications include the urgent need for differentiated and intellectually stimulating curricula, integrated socioemotional support frameworks, comprehensive teacher training, improved identification procedures, and robust school-family-community partnerships. This integrated approach is crucial for enabling gifted Filipino learners to overcome socioemotional barriers, realize their full potential, and contribute meaningfully to national development.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gil, T. (2026). Addressing the socioemotional needs of Filipino gifted learners: A systematic review. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21034865

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (62)

  1. Adams-Byers, J., Whitsell, S. S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Gifted students’ perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800102
  2. Alabbasi, A. M. A., Ayoub, A., & Ziegler, A. (2020). Are gifted students more emotionally intelligent than their non-gifted peers? A meta-analysis. High Ability Studies, 32(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2020.1770704
  3. Allen, W. T. (2017). Bullying and the unique socioemotional needs of gifted and talented early adolescents: Veteran teacher perspectives and practices. Roeper Review, 39(4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1362678
  4. Blaas, S. (2014). The relationship between social-emotional difficulties and underachievement of gifted students. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2014.1
  5. Callahan, C. M., Sowa, C. J., May, K. M., Tomchin, E. M., Plucker, J. A., Cunningham, C. M., & Taylor, W. (2004). The social and emotional development of gifted students. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  6. Cavilla, D. (2019). Maximizing the potential of gifted learners through a developmental framework of affective curriculum. Gifted Education International, 35(2), 136–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429418824875
  7. Chan, D. (2015). Education for the gifted and talented. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 158–164). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086- 8.92137-8
  8. Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2012). Motivation and gifted students: Implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 622–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21628
  9. Daniilidou, A. (2023). Understanding the relationship between multidimensional perfectionism and self- compassion in adults: The effect of age. European Journal of Psychology, 19(4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.11981
  10. Foster, J. (2007). Procrastination and perfectionism: Connections, understandings, and control. Gifted Education International, 23(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940702300307
  11. Garcia, P. M. J., & Mananzan, R. M. (2024). The nuances and dynamics of the Filipino expression Bahala Na as an experience of culture and faith. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(3), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra16788
  12. Garces-Bacsal, R. M. (2011). Socioaffective issues and concerns among gifted Filipino children. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(3), 1-14.
  13. García, A. M. C., Llopis-Bueno, M. J., Gómez-Vivo, M. G., Juan-Grau, A., Shuali-Trachtenberg, T., & Insa, L. I. L. (2021). Developing capabilities: nclusive extracurricular enrichment programs to improve the well-being of gifted adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 731591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731591
  14. Golle, J., Flaig, M., Jaggy, A., & Göllner, R. (2022). Who is bored in school? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 25(5), 1125-1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-022-01132-w
  15. Grugan, M. C., Hill, A. P., Madigan, D. J., Donachie, T. C., Olsson, L. F., & Etherson, M. (2021). Perfectionism in academically gifted students: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1631-1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09597-7
  16. Guignard, J., Bacro, F., & Guimard, P. (2021). School life satisfaction and peer connectedness of intellectually gifted adolescents in France: Is there a labeling effect? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2021(179), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20448
  17. Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F.,
  18. Nicolau, B., O & Cathain, A., Rousseau, M. C., & Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. Canadian Intellectual Property Office.
  19. Hornstra, L., Bakx, A., Mathijssen, A. C. S., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2020). Motivating gifted and non-gifted students in regular primary schools: A self-determination perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, Article 101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101871
  20. Johnson, K. (2001). Integrating an affective component in the curriculum for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 24(4), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2001-547
  21. Krannich, M., Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., Bieg, M., Roos, A., Becker, E. S., & Morger, V. (2018). Being over- or underchallenged in class: Effects on student career aspirations via academic self-concept and boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.004
  22. Lewis, E. G., & Cardwell, J. M. (2020). The big five personality traits, perfectionism and their association with mental health among UK students on professional degree programmes. BMC Psychology, 8(1), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00423-3
  23. Loos-Sant, Ana, H., & Trancoso, B. S. (2014). Socio-emotional development of Brazilian gifted children: Self-beliefs, social skills, and academic performance. Gifted Education International, 30(1), 46-62.
  24. Magtoto, F. O. M. (2017). Nature or nurture: Mentally superior young adults in the Philippines. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsp.2017.1597
  25. Marsili, F., Dell, Anna, S., & Pellegrini, M. (2023). Giftedness in inclusive education: A systematic review of research. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2190330
  26. McKay, J., Williams, K., & Stewart, J. (2023). You just want a break from the hatred of failure”: The lived experience of being a student physiotherapist perfectionist and considerations for educators. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 29(3), 893-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10287-y
  27. Mendaglio, S. (2007). Should perfectionism be a characteristic of giftedness? Gifted Education International, 23(3), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940702300303
  28. Minnie, C. (2023). Transition from primary to secondary school from the perspectives of students with autism spectrum disorder and concomitant intellectual giftedness. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 48(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2023.14
  29. Nadhirah, N. N. A., Nadhirah, N. A., & Fauzia, A. N. (2019). Profile of emotional-social competence of quarantine participants of International Junior Science Olympiad (IJSO). In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-19.2019.130
  30. Naval-Severino, T. (1992). Identification of intellectually able disadvantaged Filipino children. Gifted Education International, 8(2), 72-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142949200800203
  31. Oğurlu, Ü. (2020). Are gifted students perfectionistic? A meta-analysis. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 43(3), 227-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220933006
  32. Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.03743
  33. Opoku, M. P., Moustafa, A., Alsheikh, N., Anwahi, N., Aljaberi, M., Alkhateri, T., Almeqbaali, A., & Elhoweris, H. (2024). The nexus between the attitudes and self-concepts of gifted students in an Arab context. PLoS ONE, 19(6), Article e0304957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304957
  34. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S.,. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  35. Pancorbo, G., Primi, R., John, O. P., Santos, D., & De Fruyt, F. (2021). Formative assessment of social-emotional skills using rubrics: A review of knowns and unknowns. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 687661. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.687661
  36. Papadopoulos, D. (2021). Parenting the exceptional social-emotional needs of gifted and talented children: What do we know? Children, 8(11), Article 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110953
  37. Papandreou, A. (2023). Conforming and condescending attitude of gifted children in response to their social anxiety and asynchronous cognitive and emotional development. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.26717/bjstr.2023.50.007934
  38. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2009). The translation of teachers’ understanding of gifted students into instructional strategies for teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(4), 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9138-7
  39. Parker, W. D., & Adkins, K. K. (1995). Perfectionism and the gifted. Roeper Review, 17(3), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553653
  40. Pawilen, G. T. (2018). Home environment of selected Filipino gifted individuals. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.2.05
  41. Pawilen, G. T., & Manuel, S. J. (2018). A proposed model and framework for developing a curriculum for the gifted in the Philippines. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 118-134. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1207237.pdf
  42. Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346946
  43. Raoof, K., Shokri, O., Fathabadi, J., & Panaghi, L. (2024). Unpacking the underachievement of gifted students: A systematic review of internal and external factors. Heliyon, 10(17), Article e36908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36908
  44. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10144
  45. Renati, R., Bonfiglio, N. S., Dilda, M., Mascia, M. L., & Penna, M. P. (2022). Gifted children through the eyes of their parents: Talents, social-emotional challenges, and educational strategies from preschool through middle school. Children, 10(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10010042
  46. Roberts, S. M., & Lovett, S. B. (1994). Examining the “F” in gifted: Academically gifted adolescents physiological and affective responses to scholastic failure. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17(3), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329401700304
  47. Roedell, W. C. (1984). Vulnerabilities of highly gifted children. Roeper Review, 6(3), 127-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198409552782
  48. Ronksley-Pavia, M., & Neumann, M. M. (2020). Conceptualising gifted student (dis)engagement through the lens of learner (re)engagement. Education Sciences, 10(10), Article 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100274
  49. Saldãna, G. N., Flores-Oyarzo, G., & Navarro, M. G. G. (2022). Inteligencia emocional en estudiantes de la provincia de Concepción, Chile: Un estudio comparativo con un instrumento piloto. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 21(47), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162202202102147005
  50. Scott, M. T. (2012). Socio-emotional and psychological issues and needs of gifted African American students: Culture matters. The Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 23-35. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1056425.pdf
  51. Sharma, A., & Kudei, A. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of working with gifted learners: A systematic review. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 37(6), 491-505. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2024/v37i61360
  52. Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2018). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
  53. Silverman, L. K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3-4), 36- 58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.1997.9681865
  54. Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
  55. Stricker, J., Buecker, S., Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2019). Intellectual giftedness and multidimensional perfectionism: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09504-1
  56. Suhendri, S., Maryanah, S., Ediyanto, E., & Kawai, N. (2020). Indonesian teachers’ attitudes towards gifted students with low SES from Malay background. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 7(1), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2019.007.01.14
  57. Tam, H., Kwok, S. Y. C. L., Hui, A. N. N., Chan, D. K., Leung, C., Leung, J. T. Y., Lo, H. H. M., & Lai, S. (2020). The significance of emotional intelligence to students’ learning motivation and academic achievement: A study in Hong Kong with a Confucian heritage. Children and Youth Services Review, 121, Article 105847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105847
  58. Tan, J. S. T. (2022). Hiding behind the perfect mask: A phenomenological study of Filipino university students’ lived experiences of perfectionism. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2022.2062819
  59. Vuyk, M. A., Montania, M., & Barrios, L. (2024). Boredom and its perceived impact in adolescents with exceptional mathematical talent: A sequential mixed-methods study in Paraguay. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, Article 1214878. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1214878
  60. Yang, J., Reheman, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhao, S. (2023). Applying Rasch analysis in refinement and validation of interpersonal skills measure for gifted children. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1236640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236640
  61. Yusof, R., Ishak, N. M., Zahidi, A. M. M., & Kamaruddin, S. N. D. M. (2017). Personal identity and socio-emotional issues among Malaysian gifted and talented students. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 19(2), 167-178.
  62. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S.,. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71