KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 1

Considerations in writing individualized educational plans for gifted learners

Tyrone Gil(University of the Philippines)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ultimately, a meticulously written Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance is crucial for guiding a dynamic educational plan that fosters intellectual growth and holistic well-being.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper advocates for the critical role of Individualized Education Programs in addressing the unique needs of gifted learners, emphasizing their superiority over less formal education plans due to legal enforceability and structured individualization.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Despite policy inconsistencies and varied state approaches, IEPs provide a robust framework.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ultimately, a meticulously written Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance is crucial for guiding a dynamic educational plan that fosters intellectual growth and holistic well-being.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Individualized Educational Plan · IEP · Gifted Learners

Abstract

This paper advocates for the critical role of Individualized Education Programs in addressing the unique needs of gifted learners, emphasizing their superiority over less formal education plans due to legal enforceability and structured individualization. Despite policy inconsistencies and varied state approaches, IEPs provide a robust framework. Challenges in developing effective IEPs for gifted students include widespread misconceptions, inadequate educator training, administrative hurdles, and difficulties in crafting ambitious, measurable goals. This paper employs a systematic literature review methodology, utilizing a transparent and reproducible procedure for selecting, clustering, and summarizing relevant academic material from various databases. Key considerations for effective IEPs encompass comprehensive identification, the formulation of SMARTAC goals, differentiated curriculum, explicit attention to socio-emotional needs, meaningful parental involvement, and tailored accommodations, modifications, and support services. Ultimately, a meticulously written Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance is crucial for guiding a dynamic educational plan that fosters intellectual growth and holistic well-being.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gil, T. (2026). Considerations in writing individualized educational plans for gifted learners. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Volume: 14 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1850602

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (105)

  1. Akdeniz, H., Clark, T., & Roberts, J. L. (2025). Can AI generate questions aligned with Bloom’s taxonomy? A framework for gifted education to support teachers. Journal of Advanced Academics, 36(4), 671–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x251349917
  2. Algahtani, F. (2021). An exploration of special education teachers’ perceptions of professional development. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 22(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.705184
  3. Almeida, L. S., Araújo, A. M., Sainz-Gómez, M., & Prieto, M. D. (2016). Challenges in the identification of giftedness: Issues related to psychological assessment. Anales de Psicología, 32(3), 621–627. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.259311
  4. Avcu, Y. E., & Yaman, Y. (2022). Effectiveness of the differentiated instructional design for value education of gifted: A mixed study. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 9(1), 45–62. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jgedc/issue/68496/1058047
  5. Aykutlu, H. C., Dereli, F., Turan, B., Kurtça, T. T., & Dursun, O. B. (2024). Gifted children and psychiatric disorders: Is the risk increased compared with their peers? Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(3), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862241239649
  6. Bailey, T. R., & Weingarten, Z. (2019). Strategies for setting high-quality academic Individualized Education Program goals. National Center on Intensive Intervention. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED599697.pdf
  7. Bianco, M. (2010). Strength-based RTI: Conceptualizing a multi-tiered system for developing gifted potential. Theory Into Practice, 49(4), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2010.510763
  8. Bracken, B. A., & Brown, E. F. (2006). Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted and talented students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282905285246
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. QMiP Bulletin, 1(33), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46
  10. Brodersen, A. V., Hemmler, V., Callahan, C. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2022). Concordance of gifted education policy and practices at the state, district, and local levels. Gifted Education International, 39(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294221129928
  11. Brody, L. E. (2022). Accelerative strategies for meeting advanced learner needs. In J. L. Roberts & T. F. Inman (Eds.), Strategies for differentiating instruction (pp. 143–158). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003310426-12
  12. Cadieux, C., Crooks, C. V., & King, C. (2020). Parents’ experiences with an individualized intervention designed to strengthen the family–school partnership: The Parents in Partnership with Educators (PIPE) program. Exceptionality Education International, 29(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v29i2.9398
  13. Chan, D. (2015). Education for the gifted and talented. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 695–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.92137-8
  14. Chen, W.-R., & Chen, M.-F. (2020). Practice and evaluation of enrichment programs for the gifted and talented learners. Gifted Education International, 36(2), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420917878
  15. Christle, C. A., & Yell, M. L. (2010). Individualized Education Programs: Legal requirements and research findings. Exceptionality, 18(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2010.491740
  16. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
  17. Crepeau‐Hobson, F., & Bianco, M. (2010). Identification of gifted students with learning disabilities in a Response‐to‐Intervention era. Psychology in the Schools, 48(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20528
  18. Crepeau‐Hobson, F., & Bianco, M. (2012). Response to intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212454005
  19. Danzi, J., Reul, K., & Smith, R. (2008). Improving student motivation in mixed ability classrooms using differentiated instruction [Master’s thesis, Saint Xavier University]. ERIC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED500838.pdf
  20. Del-Val, P. B., & Griffin, C. L. (1988). Implementing the clinical supervision process in special education. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 4(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/j008v04n01_02
  21. Demir, S. (2023). Identification of the academic differences of gifted children from the perspective of parents: Needs assessment for differentiation. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 11(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1290094
  22. Diehm, E. A. (2017). Writing measurable and academically relevant IEP goals with 80% accuracy over three consecutive trials. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 2(16), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp2.sig16.34
  23. Elias, M. J., Marsili, F., Fullmer, L., Morganti, A., & Bruno, E. (2024). The social-emotional competencies of gifted children must be intentionally developed, ideally in inclusive education contexts. Gifted Education International. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241300393
  24. First, M. B. (2012). Individual Education Plan. In Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders (p. 1569). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_1161
  25. Foley‐Nicpon, M., & Kim, J. Y. C. (2018). Identifying and providing evidence-based services for twice-exceptional students. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 349–362). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-023
  26. García, A. I., Álvarez, T., Román, M. D. G., Guillén, V. M., Merchán, D. T., & Zamudio, S. C. (2020). University mentoring programmes for gifted high school students: Satisfaction of workshops. Sustainability, 12(13), Article 5282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135282
  27. Gilman, B., Lovecky, D. V., Kearney, K., Peters, D. B., Wasserman, J. D., Silverman, L. K.,. & Rimm, S. B. (2013). Critical issues in the identification of gifted students with co-existing disabilities. SAGE Open, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013505855
  28. Göksu, D. Y., Göksu, S., & Kocaman, C. (2024). Türki̇ye bağlamında üstün yetenekli̇ öğrenci̇leri̇n sosyo-duygusal geli̇şi̇mi̇ ve eği̇ti̇me etki̇leri̇ [Socio-emotional development of gifted students in the context of Turkey and its effects on education]. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 18(1), 125–145. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/neueefd/issue/85923/1563729
  29. Goldman, S. E., & Burke, M. M. (2016). The effectiveness of interventions to increase parent involvement in special education: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Exceptionality, 25(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196444
  30. Gottfried, M. A., & Kirksey, J. J. (2020). Preparing teachers to educate students with learning disabilities. Brookings Institution. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605100.pdf
  31. Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 14, Article 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163
  32. Guilbault, K. M., Leithauser, H., & Genheimer, K. (2025). Using the ElemenOE with parents to identify Dąbrowskian overexcitabilities among precocious children. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15395909
  33. Guthrie, K. (2019). “Nothing is ever easy”: Parent perceptions of intensity in their gifted adolescent children. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2080–2101. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3598
  34. Hammond, H., Ingalls, L., & Trussell, R. P. (2023). Family members’ involvement in the initial Individual Education Program (IEP) meeting and the IEP process: Perceptions and reactions. International Journal about Parents in Education, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.54195/ijpe.18154
  35. Heacox, D., & Cash, R. M. (2013). Differentiation for gifted learners: Going beyond the basics. Free Spirit Publishing. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED564367
  36. Hemmler, Y. M., Martin, F., Gezer, T., & Ifenthaler, D. (2025). Best practices for conducting systematic reviews: Perspectives of experienced systematic review researchers in educational sciences. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09819-9
  37. Hodges, J., Tay, J., Maeda, Y., & Gentry, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of gifted and talented identification practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
  38. İlik, Ş. Ş. (2019). Evaluation of the opinions of teachers working in the education of gifted students towards preparing, implementing and monitoring individualized education programs. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2569
  39. Johnsen, S. K., Parker, S., & Farah, Y. N. (2015). Providing services for students with gifts and talents within a response-to-intervention framework. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(4), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915569358
  40. Josephson, J., Wolfgang, C., & Mehrenberg, R. (2018). Strategies for supporting students who are twice-exceptional. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1073
  41. Karagöz, A. K., & Ulutaş, B. (2024). Özel yeteneklilerin eğitiminde bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim programları hakkında okul bileşenlerinin görüş ve önerileri [School components’ opinions and suggestions on individualized education programs in the education of gifted students]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 1096–1121. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2024.-1331219
  42. Kuznetsova, E., Liashenko, A., Zhozhikashvili, N., & Arsalidou, M. (2024). Giftedness identification and cognitive, physiological and psychological characteristics of gifted children: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1411981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411981
  43. Leaño, A. J. (2022). Curriculum implementation, teachers’ competencies and preferred teaching approaches for kindergarten gifted education program: An assessment. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak Kebangsaan, 11, 42–55. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpak.vol11.sp.5.2022
  44. Lo, C. O., Lin-Yang, R. C., & Chrostowski, M. (2021). Giftedness as a framework of inclusive education. Gifted Education International, 38(3), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211049157
  45. Love, A. M. A., Cai, R. Y., Stephenson, J., Gallagher, E., Toland, M. D., & Gibbs, V. (2024). Adaptation of COMPASS for use in autism-specific schools in Australia: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06345-y
  46. Madaus, J. W., Tarconish, E. J., Langdon, S. W., & Gelbar, N. (2022). High school and transition experiences of twice exceptional students with autism spectrum disorder: Parents’ perceptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 995356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.995356
  47. Maker, C. J., Muammar, O. M., Serino, L., Kuang, C.-C., Mohamed, M. A., & Sak, U. (2006). The DISCOVER curriculum model: Nurturing and enhancing creativity in all children. NAGC Publications. http://ir.ydu.edu.tw/handle/310997200/10416
  48. Mangongon, F. A. A. (2023). Challenges encountered by special educators: Inputs for the improvement of the individualized education program. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v2i1.25
  49. Marsili, F., Dell’Anna, S., & Pellegrini, M. (2023). Giftedness in inclusive education: A systematic review of research. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2190330
  50. Matthews, D. J., & Dai, D. Y. (2014). Gifted education: Changing conceptions, emphases and practice. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(4), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2014.979578
  51. Merry, M. S. (2008). Educational justice and the gifted. Theory and Research in Education, 6(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878507086730
  52. Minić, J. (2019). Transition and the gifted: Between identification and non-recognition. Socioloski Pregled, 53(3), 1155–1174. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg53-22980
  53. Molapo, T. P., & Salyers, M. (2014). Parent-teacher shared commitment as a predictor for teachers’ attitudes toward gifted students and gifted education. Journal of Studies in Education, 4(1), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v4i1.4819
  54. Murray, M., Handyside, L. M., Straka, L. A., & Arton-Titus, T. V. (2013). Parent empowerment: Connecting with preservice special education teachers. School Community Journal, 23(1), 145–168. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1004336.pdf
  55. National Association for Gifted Children. (2014). Differentiating curriculum and instruction for gifted and talented students.
  56. National Association for Gifted Children. (2019). The importance of parent, family, and community engagement [Position statement]. https://assets.noviams.com/novi-file-uploads/nagc/Position_Statements/Parent_Family_Community_Posi.pdf
  57. Nakano, T. de C., Carvalho, A. P. C., & Morais, I. D. T. de. (2021). Perceptions about special education and giftedness between psychologists and psychology students: Some reflections. Research, Society and Development, 10(16), Article e424101623632. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i16.23632
  58. Neber, H. (2021). Educating the gifted: An opportunity for improving the quality of teaching and learning in classrooms. Canadian Journal of Education, 44(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.7202/1076754ar
  59. Nicholas, M., Skourdoumbis, A., & Bradbury, O. (2024). Meeting the needs and potentials of high-ability, high-performing, and gifted students via differentiation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231222225
  60. Pahrudin, A., Syafril, S., Erlina, N., Saputri, A., & Fitriani, F. (2024). Adaptive learning models for gifted and talented students: Global perspectives and implementation challenges. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 9(2), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v9i2.24754
  61. Panke, S. (2019). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
  62. Papadopoulos, D. (2021). Parenting the exceptional social-emotional needs of gifted and talented children: What do we know? Children, 8(11), Article 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110953
  63. Pawilen, G. T., & Manuel, S. J. (2018). A proposed model and framework for developing a curriculum for the gifted in the Philippines. Journal of Nature Studies, 17(2), 78–92. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1207237.pdf
  64. Persson, R. S. (2010). Experiences of intellectually gifted students in an egalitarian and inclusive educational system: A survey study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(4), 536–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003300405
  65. Peters, S. J. (2021). The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211002535
  66. Pfeiffer, S. I. (2011). Current perspectives on the identification and assessment of gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428192
  67. Phelps, C., Brazzolotto, M., & Shaughnessy, M. F. (2022). Identification and teaching practices that support inclusion in gifted education. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 9(4), 305–319. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jgedc/issue/75832/1233298
  68. Polirstok, S., & Hogan, J. A. (2024). Implementation of RtI as a part of multi-tiered systems of support: What teachers, administrators, and teacher educators need to know. Journal of Education and Human Development, 16(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.14305/jn.19440413.2024.16.2.05
  69. Ranbir, S. (2024). Individualized Education Programs (IEPs): Best practices for tailoring instruction to meet diverse learning needs. Universal Research Reports, 11(1), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.36676/urr.v11.i1.1275
  70. Rashid, S. M. M., & Wong, M. T. (2022). Challenges of implementing the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) for special needs children with learning disabilities: Systematic literature review (SLR). International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.1.2
  71. Reich, S. M. (2009). Individualized Education Plan (IEP). In E. Anderman & L. Anderman (Eds.), Psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia (pp. 540–543). Gale. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71799-9_211
  72. Rubenstein, L. D., Sandifer, C. B., & Spoon, R. (2022). Reimagining IDEA using the axiom of brilliance. Phi Delta Kappan, 103(6), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221082805
  73. Schirmer, B. R. (2018). Framework for conducting and writing a synthetic literature review. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v10i1.12799
  74. Scott, M. T. (2014). Using the Blooms–Banks matrix to develop multicultural differentiated lessons for gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 37(3), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514532275
  75. Seedorf, S. (2014). Response to intervention. Gifted Child Today, 37(4), 213–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514544029
  76. Seeley, K. (2017). Gifted and talented students at risk. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17161/fec.v37i4.6870
  77. Sewell, C. J. P. (2016). Review of Failing our brightest kids: The global challenge of educating high-ability students. Education Review, 23. https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v23.2040
  78. Shabani, Y., & Bajrami, V. (2025). Teachers’ views on the readiness of the education system for work with gifted students. Journal of Human Research in Rehabilitation, 15(1), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.042515
  79. Shepherd, K. G., Fowler, S., McCormick, J., Wilson, C. L., & Morgan, D. (2016). The search for role clarity: Challenges and implications for special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(2), 83–97.
  80. Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2018). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
  81. Smith, S. A. (2025). Systemic integration of gifted and MTSS: A state-level approach. Gifted Child Today, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175251330330
  82. Steenbergen‐Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210383155
  83. Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
  84. Strassfeld, N. M. (2018). Preparing pre-service special education teachers to facilitate parent involvement, knowledge, and advocacy: Considerations for curriculum. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(4), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406418806643
  85. Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski‐Kubilius, P., Corwith, S., Calvert, E., & Worrell, F. C. (2023). Transforming gifted education in schools: Practical applications of a comprehensive framework for developing academic talent. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070707
  86. Tirri, K., & Laine, S. (2017). Ethical challenges in inclusive education: The case of gifted students. In C. Forlin & A. J. Lian (Eds.), International perspectives on inclusive education (pp. 239–249). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-363620170000009010
  87. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C. M., Hertberg, H. L., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K.,. & Reynolds, T. D. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
  88. Toprak, Ö. F., & Çolak, A. (2024). IEP team members’ experiences on the process of preparing individualized education program in a secondary school. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 17(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1325209
  89. Treffinger, D. J., & Selby, E. C. (2009). Levels of service (LoS): A contemporary approach to programming for talent development. Center for Creative Learning.
  90. VanTassel‐Baska, J. (2018). American policy in gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 41(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517753020
  91. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 342–358.
  92. VanTassel‐Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2022). An analysis of stakeholder perceptions of gifted programs: A report card on gifted program performance. Gifted Child Today, 45(3), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221091859
  93. VanTassel‐Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_5
  94. Wang, P., & Woolf, S. B. (2015). Trends and issues in bilingual special education teacher preparation: A literature review. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 15(2), 18–33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1176136.pdf
  95. Williams-Diehm, K., Palmer, S. B., Lee, Y., & Schroer, H. (2010). Goal content analysis for middle and high school students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(3), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728810380230
  96. Wilkinson King, E. (n.d.). Twice-exceptional students: Addressing the social and emotional needs of twice-exceptional students. [Unpublished manuscript or White Paper].
  97. Wilson, V. (2016). Research methods: Content analysis. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(1), 41–43. https://doi.org/10.18438/b8cg9d
  98. Wong, M. T., & Rashid, S. M. M. (2022). Challenges of special education teachers in implementation Individual Education Plan (IEP) for students with learning disabilities (LD). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(11), 1515–1528. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i11/15159
  99. Worrell, F. C., & Erwin, J. (2011). Best practices in identifying students for gifted and talented education programs. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27(4), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2011.615817
  100. Yıldırım, Ö., & Çelikkol, A. K. (2023). Investigation of the resilience, self-efficacy, and perceived social support of gifted students. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 24(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.1195044
  101. Yusop, N. S. M., Rosli, M. M., Farid, N. F., Nazri, N. A. S. M., Jamil, N., & Ramli, M. I. (2024). Development of a collaborative intelligent individual education program system using a prototyping approach. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14(3), 14666–14672. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.7352
  102. Ziernwald, L., Hillmayr, D., & Holzberger, D. (2022). Promoting high-achieving students through differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 503–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221112931
  103. Gilman, B., Lovecky, D. V., Kearney, K., Peters, D. B., Wasserman, J. D., Silverman, L. K.,. & Rimm, S. B. (2013). Critical issues in the identification of gifted students with co-existing disabilities. SAGE Open, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013505855
  104. Karagöz, A. K., & Ulutaş, B. (2024). Özel yeteneklilerin eğitiminde bireyselleştirilmiş eğitim programları hakkında okul bileşenlerinin görüş ve önerileri [School components’ opinions and suggestions on individualized education programs in the education of gifted students]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 1096–1121. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2024.-1331219
  105. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C. M., Hertberg, H. L., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K.,. & Reynolds, T. D. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203