KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Development of the Personalized Learning Self-Efficacy Scale and the Personalized Instruction Self-Efficacy Scale

Hasan Said Tortop(International Vision University)
Gökhan Ilgaz(TRAKYA UNIVERSITY)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Consequently, both scales can be considered valid and reliable instruments for future research on personalized learning and personalized instruction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Personalized learning is an educational approach that focuses on adapting learning experiences according to students’ individual differences, interests, learning needs, and learning pace.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The participants consisted of 151 pre-service teachers enrolled at Trakya University.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Consequently, both scales can be considered valid and reliable instruments for future research on personalized learning and personalized instruction.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Personalized instruction · Personalized Instruction Self-Efficacy Scale · Personalized learning

Abstract

Personalized learning is an educational approach that focuses on adapting learning experiences according to students’ individual differences, interests, learning needs, and learning pace. However, valid and reliable instruments for measuring personalized learning self-efficacy and personalized instruction self-efficacy remain limited. This study aimed to develop the Personalized Learning Self-Efficacy Scale and the Personalized Instruction Self-Efficacy Scale and to examine their psychometric properties. The study was conducted as a scale development research. The participants consisted of 151 pre-service teachers enrolled at Trakya University. The Personalized Learning Self-Efficacy Scale included 12 items and four dimensions, whereas the Personalized Instruction Self-Efficacy Scale included 15 items and five dimensions. Data were analyzed using second-order confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, and Average Variance Extracted values. The Personalized Learning Self-Efficacy Scale showed acceptable model fit, χ²(50) = 100, p < .001, CFI = .989, TLI = .985, SRMR = .073, RMSEA = .082. Its Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients were .863 and .872, respectively. The Personalized Instruction Self-Efficacy Scale showed very good model fit, χ²(85) = 115, p = .017, CFI = .998, TLI = .997, SRMR = .055, RMSEA = .048. Its Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients were .924 and .926, respectively. AVE values were above .50 for all dimensions in both scales. The findings confirmed the second-order factor structures of both scales and showed that they had adequate construct validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency reliability. Consequently, both scales can be considered valid and reliable instruments for future research on personalized learning and personalized instruction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tortop, H. S., Ilgaz, G. (2026). Development of the Personalized Learning Self-Efficacy Scale and the Personalized Instruction Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21035409

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Ayeni, O. O., Al Hamad, N. M., Chisom, O. N., Osawaru, B., & Adewusi, O. E. (2024). AI in education: A review of personalized learning and educational technology. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0062
  2. Bayanbay, F. T., Bekbolat, M. S., & Berkimbayev, K. M. (2026). Personalized learning in computer science for gifted students: A systematic review. Өрлеу. Үздіксіз білім жаршысы – Өрлеу. Вести непрерывного образования, 52(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.69927/DHDR5030
  3. Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.
  4. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self‐determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  5. DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  6. Dumont, H., & Ready, D. D. (2023). On the promise of personalized learning for educational equity. npj Science of Learning, 8, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00174-x
  7. Gallucci, M., & Jentschke, S. (2021). SEMLj: jamovi SEM Analysis [jamovi module]. https://semlj.github.io/
  8. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). Routledge.
  9. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  10. Kettler, T., & Taliaferro, C. (2022). Personalized learning in gifted education: Differentiated instruction that maximizes students' potential. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003237136
  11. Koper, R. (2014). Conditions for effective smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0005-4
  12. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Molenaar, I. (2022). Towards hybrid human-AI learning technologies. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 632–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12527
  14. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
  15. Rosseel, Y. (2019). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
  16. Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7, Article 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9
  17. The jamovi project. (2025). jamovi (Version 2.7) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
  18. Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades. ERIC Digest.
  19. Tortop, H. S. (2024). Differentiated instruction for gifted: Instructional strategies, techniques, and curriculum differentiation models (1st ed.). Genç Bilge (Young Wise) Publishing.
  20. Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 235– 252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1747757
  21. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2