KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31

YEMEK PİŞİRME YAKITI TERCİHLERİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

COOKING FUEL CHOICES: THE CASE OF TÜRKİYE

Abdulkerim Karaaslan(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-1318-5978
Feyza Dahasert0009-0003-8056-0664
Sayfa
578–597
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, gelir, hanehalkı büyüklüğü ve konut türünün yakıt tercihlerinde önemli belirleyiciler olduğunu göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki hanelerin yemek pişirme yakıt tercihini etkileyen faktörleri incelemeyi amaçlamakta olup, sosyo-demografik ve ekonomik belirleyicilere odaklanmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu’nun Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi (2015-2018) verilerini kullanarak Multinominal Probit Modeli ile gerçekleştirilen analiz, 47.529 haneyi kapsamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, gelir, hanehalkı büyüklüğü ve konut türünün yakıt tercihlerinde önemli belirleyiciler olduğunu göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015-2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Pişirme enerjisi · enerji tercihi · multinomial probit model

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki hanelerin yemek pişirme yakıt tercihini etkileyen faktörleri incelemeyi amaçlamakta olup, sosyo-demografik ve ekonomik belirleyicilere odaklanmaktadır. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu’nun Hanehalkı Bütçe Anketi (2015-2018) verilerini kullanarak Multinominal Probit Modeli ile gerçekleştirilen analiz, 47.529 haneyi kapsamaktadır. Çalışmada gelir, hanehalkı büyüklüğü, konut türü, ısıtma sistemleri, eğitim durumu ve medeni hal gibi değişkenler incelenmektedir. Bulgular, gelir, hanehalkı büyüklüğü ve konut türünün yakıt tercihlerinde önemli belirleyiciler olduğunu göstermektedir. Merkezi ısıtma sistemine sahip hanelerin daha temiz yakıtları kullanma olasılığının daha yüksek olduğu, buna karşın geleneksel ısıtma sistemlerine sahip hanelerin ise ağırlıklı olarak odun ve kömür kullandığı tespit edilmiştir. Politika önerileri arasında düşük gelirli haneler için temiz pişirme yakıtlarının sübvanse edilmesi ve kırsal bölgelerde enerji altyapısının iyileştirilmesi yer almaktadır. Çalışma, haneler için daha temiz enerji seçeneklerinin önemini vurgulamakta ve Türkiye’deki enerji politikalarının şekillendirilmesine yönelik değerli öngörüler sunmaktadır.

Abstract

This research seeks to examine how socio-demographic and economic variables influence the cooking fuel choices of households in Türkiye. This study employs a multinomial probit model to examine 47.529 households using data from the Turkish Statistical Institute’s 2015–2018 Household Budget Survey. The analysis incorporates explanatory variables including household income, household size, dwelling type, heating system, educational attainment, and marital status. Income, household size and housing type are shown to be important in determining fuel choice. Households with central heating prefer cleaner fuels, while households with traditional heating systems use wood and coal. Policy recommendations include promoting cleaner cooking fuels through subsidies for low-income households and improving energy infrastructure in rural areas. The research highlights the importance of cleaner energy for households and the findings provide guidance on how best to shape energy policies for Türkiye.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Karaaslan, A., Dahasert, F. (2025). YEMEK PİŞİRME YAKITI TERCİHLERİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31, 578–597. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2025.022

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (40)

  1. Adusah-Poku, F., and Takeuchi, K. (2019). Household energy expenditure in Ghana: A double-hurdle model approach. World Development, 117, 266-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.01.015
  2. Akeh, G. I., Adamu, B. M., Adamu, H., and Ade, S. M. (2023). Determinants of household cooking energy choice in public housing estates in Maiduguri, Borno State, North-east Nigeria. Journal of Energy Research and Reviews, 13(3), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.9734/jegrr/2023/v13i32930
  3. Akpalu, W., Dasmani, I., and Aglobitse, P. B. (2011). Demand for cooking fuels in a developing country: To what extent do taste and preferences matter? Energy Policy, 39(10), 6525-6531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.039
  4. Alem, Y., Beyene, A. D., Köhlin, G., and Mekonnen, A. (2016). Modeling household cooking fuel choice: A panel multinomial logit approach. Energy Economics, 59, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.08.010
  5. Al-Janabi, Z., Woolley, K., Thomas, G. N., and Bartington, S. (2021). Between domestic cooking energy source type and respiratory infections among children aged under five years. Public Health, 18, 8516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.8516
  6. Altınışık, Z. (2007). Multinomial probit modeller. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  7. Baiyegunhi, L. S., and Hassan, M. B. (2014). Rural household fuel energy transition: Evidence from Giwa LGA Kaduna State, Nigeria. Energy for Sustainable Development, 20, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2014.01.002
  8. Buba, A., Abdu, M., Adamu, I., and Usman, Y. I. (2017). Socio-economic determinants of households fuel consumption in Nigeria. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 5(10), 348-360. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i10.2017.1510
  9. Çebi Karaaslan, K. (2021). Analysis of factors affecting individuals' sources of happiness with multinomial logistic model. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 12(3), 286-302. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.925631
  10. Çebi Karaaslan, K., Algül, Y., and Karaaslan, A. (2022). Space heating preferences in households: Nested logit model approach in Turkey. Energy and Buildings, 273, 112353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112353
  11. Danlami, A. H., Applanaidu, S. D., and Islam, R. (2018). An analysis of household cooking fuel choice: A case of Bauchi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-02-2018-0006
  12. Emagbetere, E., Odia, J., and Oreko, B. U. (2016). Assessment of household energy utilized for cooking in Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 35(4), 796-804. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v35i4.5
  13. Farsi, M., Filippini, M., and Pachauri, S. (2007). Fuel choices in urban Indian households. Environment and Development Economics, 12(6), 757-774. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X07003832
  14. Heltberg, R. (2004). Fuel switching: Evidence from eight developing countries. Energy Economics, 26(5), 869-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.006
  15. Hou, B. D., Tang, X., Ma, C., Liu, L., Wei, Y. M., and Liao, H. (2017). Cooking fuel choice in rural China: Result from microdata. Journal of Cleaner Production, 538-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.073
  16. Ifegbesan, A. P., Rampedi, I. T., and Annegarn, H. J. (2016). Nigerian households' cooking energy use, determinants of choice, and some implications for human health and environmental sustainability. Habitat International, 55, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.03.002
  17. Joshi, J., and Bohara, A. K. (2017). Household preferences for cooking fuels and inter-fuel substitutions: Unlocking the modern fuels in the Nepalese household. Energy Policy, 107, 507-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.013
  18. Karimu, A., Mensah, J. T., and Adu, G. (2016). Who adopts LPG as the main cooking fuel and why? Empirical evidence on Ghana based on national survey. World Development, 85, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.04.002
  19. Liao, H., Chen, T., Tang, X., and Wu, J. (2019). Fuel choices for cooking in China: Analysis based on multinomial logit model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.003
  20. Lokonon, B. O. K. (2020). Household cooking fuel choice: Evidence from the Republic of Benin. African Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12401
  21. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Sage Publications.
  22. Maddala, G. S. (1986). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Mensah, J. T., and Adu, G. (2015). An empirical analysis of household energy choice in Ghana. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 1402-1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.104
  24. Nlom, J. H., and Karimov, A. A. (2015). Modeling fuel choice among households in Northern Cameroon. Sustainability, 9989-9999. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7119989
  25. Nnaji, C. E., Ukwueze, E. R., and Chukwu, J. O. (2012). Determinants of household energy choices for cooking in rural areas: Evidence from Enugu State, Nigeria. Continental Journal of Social Sciences, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1115535
  26. Nnaji, M., Eze, A. A., Uzoma, C. C., and Nnaji, C. E. (2021, April). Addressing household cooking fuel options in Nigeria. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 730, No. 1, p. 012038). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/730/1/012038
  27. Nwaka, I. D., Uma, K. E., and Ike, G. N. (2020). Determinants of household fuel choices among Nigerian family heads: Are there gender-differentiated impacts? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(34), 42656-42669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09474-2
  28. Özcan, K. M., Gülay, E., and Üçdoğruk, Ş. (2013). Economic and demographic determinants of household energy use in Turkey. *Energy Policy, 550-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.034
  29. Paudel, U., Khatri, U., and Pant, K. P. (2018). Understanding the determinants of household cooking fuel choice in Afghanistan: A multinomial logit estimation. Energy, 156, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.029
  30. Pundo, M. O., and Fraser, G. C. (2006). Multinomial logit analysis of household cooking fuel choice in rural Kenya: The case of Kisumu District. Agrekon, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2006.9523775
  31. Rahut, D. B., Behera, B., and Ali, A. (2016). Patterns and determinants of household use of fuels for cooking: Empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 117, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.01.005
  32. Rahut, D. B., Das, S., De Groote, H., and Behera, B. (2014). Determinants of household energy use in Bhutan. Energy, 69, 661-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.035
  33. Rao, M. N., and Reddy, B. S. (2007). Variations in energy use by Indian households: An analysis of micro level data. Energy, 32(2), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.05.023
  34. Stabridis, O., and van Gameren, E. (2018). Exposure to firewood: Consequences for health and labor force participation in Mexico. World Development, 107, 382-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.003
  35. Tarı, R. (2012). Ekonometri. Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları.
  36. Termodinamik.info. (n.d.). Fuel oil ve genel bir bakış. Retrieved May 27, 2025, from https://www.termodinamik.info/fuel-oil-e-genel-bir-bakis
  37. Tiwari, V., Jana, A., and Bandyopadhyay, S. (2024). Choice of cooking and lighting energy sources in households: Empirical evidence from urban India.
  38. TÜİK. (2018). Household Budget Statistics Micro Data Set, 2018. Retrieved from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/MicroVeri/HBA_2018/english/index.html
  39. Williams, K. N., Thompson, L. M., Sakas, Z., Hengstermann, M., Quinn, A., Diáz-Artiga, A., … Harvey, S. A. (2020). Designing a comprehensive behaviour change intervention to promote and monitor exclusive use of liquefied petroleum gas stoves for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial. BMJ Open, 10(9). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037761
  40. Yongolo, V., Mkelenga, A. J., and Mpeta, I. F. (2023). Determinants on the choice of the main source of cooking energy by households in urban areas of Tanzania: A case of Kiwanja Cha Ndege ward in Morogoro Municipality.