Dergiler / Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 33

ERTELENMİŞ VERGİLERİN KAZANÇ YÖNETİMİNDE STRATEJİK KULLANIMI: DÖRT-TİPOLOJİ ANALİZİNDEN BULGULAR

STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT OF DEFERRED TAXES IN EARNINGS MANAGEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A FOUR-TYPOLOGY ANALYSIS

Gülhan Suadiye(HATAY MUSTAFA KEMAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2619-2146
Sayfa
480–502
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Tam örneklem sonuçları, DTE ile kazanç yönetimi arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığını, buna karşın net ertelenmiş vergi varlıklarının (NDTA) pozitif bir ilişki sergilediğini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, firmaların ertelenmiş vergi pozisyonlarını kazanç yönetimi ile stratejik olarak nasıl koordine ettiğini incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Borsa İstanbul'da (BİST) listelenen 185 finansal olmayan firmanın 2008-2022 dönemine ait verileri kullanılarak firmalar, ertelenmiş vergi gideri (DTE) ve ihtiyari tahakkuk (DA) işaretlerine dayalı dört stratejik gruba ayrılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Tam örneklem sonuçları, DTE ile kazanç yönetimi arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığını, buna karşın net ertelenmiş vergi varlıklarının (NDTA) pozitif bir ilişki sergilediğini göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2008-2022 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Ertelenmiş vergiler · net ertelenmiş vergi varlıkları · kazanç yönetimi

Özet

Bu çalışma, firmaların ertelenmiş vergi pozisyonlarını kazanç yönetimi ile stratejik olarak nasıl koordine ettiğini incelemektedir. Borsa İstanbul'da (BİST) listelenen 185 finansal olmayan firmanın 2008-2022 dönemine ait verileri kullanılarak firmalar, ertelenmiş vergi gideri (DTE) ve ihtiyari tahakkuk (DA) işaretlerine dayalı dört stratejik gruba ayrılmıştır. Tüm örneklem ve her grup için Driscoll-Kraay standart hataları ile Sabit Etkiler regresyonları tahmin edilmiştir. Tam örneklem sonuçları, DTE ile kazanç yönetimi arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığını, buna karşın net ertelenmiş vergi varlıklarının (NDTA) pozitif bir ilişki sergilediğini göstermektedir. Strateji bazlı analizler, bu ilişkinin stratejik profile bağlı olarak değiştiğini; agresif, vergi maliyetli ve vergi avantajlı stratejilerde anlamsızken, kârı düzeltme stratejisinde güçlü ve pozitif olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bulgu, firmaların eş zamanlı olarak kârı azaltıcı tahakkuklar ve yüksek DTE raporladığı koordineli bir yaklaşımı göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, ertelenmiş vergi hesaplarının pasif teknik kalemler değil, aktif stratejik araçlar olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Abstract

This study investigates how firms strategically coordinate deferred tax positions with earnings management. Using panel data from 185 non-financial firms listed on Borsa Istanbul (2008–2022), firms were classified into a four-part typology based on the signs of deferred tax expense (DTE) and discretionary accruals (DA). Fixed Effects regressions with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors reveal no significant relationship between DTE and DA, while net deferred tax assets (NDTA) exhibit a positive association. Strategy-specific analyses, however, uncover substantial heterogeneity. The DTE–DA relationship is contingent upon strategic profile: insignificant in aggressive, tax-costly, and tax-advantaged strategies, yet strongly positive in the smoothing strategy—revealing a coordinated dual approach wherein firms simultaneously report income-decreasing accruals and high DTE. The typology demonstrates that deferred tax accounts function not as passive technical items but as active strategic tools, and that their role can only be understood through strategic heterogeneity

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Suadiye, G. (2026). ERTELENMİŞ VERGİLERİN KAZANÇ YÖNETİMİNDE STRATEJİK KULLANIMI: DÖRT-TİPOLOJİ ANALİZİNDEN BULGULAR. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 33, 480–502. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2026.021

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (49)

  1. Andari, D., Andriana, N., & Mariana, C. (2025). The effect of deferred tax expenses and leverage on earnings management (Study on consumer good sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018-2022). Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR), 4(3), 1409–1424. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i3.116
  2. Badertscher, B. A., Phillips, J. D., Pincus, M., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Earnings management strategies and the trade-off between tax benefits and detection risk: To conform or not to conform? The Accounting Review, 84(1), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.1.63
  3. Bauman, C. C., Bauman, M. P., & Halsey, R. F. (2001). Do firms use the deferred tax asset valuation allowance to manage earnings? The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 23(s-1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.2308/jata.2001.23.s-1.27
  4. Blaylock, B., Shevlin, T., & Wilson, R. J. (2012). Tax avoidance, large positive temporary book-tax differences, and earnings persistence. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10158
  5. Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00017-7
  6. Burgstahler, D., Elliott, W. B., & Hanlon, M. (2002). How firms avoid losses: Evidence of use of the net deferred tax asset account [Working paper]. University of Washington. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.355780
  7. Cho, J., Wong, J., & Wong, N. (2006). Book-tax differences and inland revenue audit adjustments in New Zealand. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 33(9-10), 1650–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00646.x
  8. Christensen, T. E., Paik, G. H., & Stice, E. K. (2008). Creating a bigger bath using the deferred tax valuation allowance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35(5-6), 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02092.x
  9. Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. M. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
  10. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-9505096112
  11. DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2), 145–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90008-6
  12. Dhaliwal, D., Gleason, C., & Mills, L. (2004). Last-chance earnings management: Using the tax expense to meet analysts' forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 431–459. https://doi.org/10.1506/TFVV-UYT1-NNYT-1YFH
  13. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  14. Ettredge, M. L., Sun, L., Lee, P., & Anandarajan, A. A. (2008). Is earnings fraud associated with high deferred tax and/or book minus tax levels? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 27(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.1
  15. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.06.003
  16. Frank, M. M., & Rego, S. O. (2006). Do managers use the valuation allowance account to manage earnings around certain earnings targets? The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 28(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.2308/jata.2006.28.1.43
  17. Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467–496. https://doi.org/10.2308/ACCR.2009.84.2.467
  18. Gündüz, M. (2025). The impact of tax accounting and planning on earnings management: Evidence from panel ARDL approach. PLOS ONE, 20(11), e0336911. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336911
  19. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
  20. Hanlon, M., & Shevlin, T. (2002). The tax benefits of employee stock options: The accounting and implications for research. Accounting Horizons, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2002.16.1.1
  21. Herbohn, K., Tutticci, I., & Khor, P. S. (2010). Changes in unrecognized deferred tax accruals from carry-forward losses: Earnings management or signaling? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 37(7-8), 763–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02207.x
  22. Herbohn, K., Tutticci, I., & Tan, Z. (2016). The market response to beating after-tax earnings targets revisited using analysts’ pre-tax earnings forecasts and concurrent tax note disclosures. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 43(1-2), 31–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12181
  23. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X07007003
  24. Holland, K., & Jackson, R. H. G. (2004). Earnings management and deferred tax. Accounting and Business Research, 34(2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729956
  25. Jackson, M. (2015). Book-tax differences and future earnings changes. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 37(2), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-51164
  26. Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491047
  27. Junqueira, M. A. D. R., & Nakao, S. H. (2013). The role of deferred tax in the regulatory capital of Brazilian financial institutions. Revista Contabilidade and Finanças, 24(62), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772013000300003
  28. Kapoutsou, E., Tzovas, C., & Chalevas, C. (2015). Earnings management and income tax evidence from Greece. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(2), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i2c5p1
  29. Kasipillai, J., & Mahenthiran, S. (2013). Deferred taxes, earnings management, and corporate governance: Malaysian evidence. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2013.03.001
  30. Kirschenheiter, M., & Melumad, N. D. (2002). Can "big bath" and earnings smoothing co-exist as equilibrium financial reporting strategies? Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3), 761–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00070
  31. Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
  32. Kurt, Y. (2024). Kar düzleştirme üzerinde ertelenmiş vergi varlığı, vergi planlaması ve finansal performansın etkisi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.1309668
  33. Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(03)00121-1
  34. Miller, G. S., & Skinner, D. J. (1998). Determinants of the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets under SFAS No. 109. The Accounting Review, 73(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-542135
  35. Moniz, A., Couto, G., & Pimentel, P. (2022). Misuse of deferred taxes in Portugal. Economies, 10(9), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10090230
  36. Muda, S. I., & Sunardi, N. (2024). The effect of current tax expense, deferred tax assets and dividend policy on earnings management. Journal of Investment Development, Economics and Accounting, 1(1), 14–26. https://ojs.ideanusa.com/index.php/JIDEA/article/view/141
  37. Mura, A. (2023). Reconciling competing reporting objectives through deferred tax accounts: Evidence on private Italian firms. Accounting in Europe, 20(3), 304–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2213249
  38. Özçelik, M. (2021). Ertelenmiş vergilerin dönem net kârına etkisinin analizi. Mali Çözüm, 31(164), 59–82. https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/459600/ertelenmis-vergilerin-donem-net-karina-etkisinin-analizi
  39. Phillips, J. D., Pincus, M., Rego, S. O., & Wan, H. (2004). Decomposing changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities to isolate earnings management activities. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 26(s-1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.2308/jata.2004.26.s-1.43
  40. Phillips, J., Pincus, M., & Rego, S. O. (2003). Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review, 78(2), 491–521. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.491
  41. Sari, D. P., & Afandi, A. (2023). Effect of deferred tax assets, tax expense and current tax on earnings management. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi (JPENSI), 8(3), 521–536. https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/4383759
  42. Schrand, C. M., & Wong, M. H. F. (2003). Earnings management using the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets under SFAS No. 109. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(3), 579–611. https://doi.org/10.1506/480D-098U-607R-5D9W
  43. Skinner, D. J. (2008). The rise of deferred tax assets in Japan: The role of deferred tax accounting in the Japanese banking crisis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(2-3), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.07.003
  44. Skinner, D. J., & Sloan, R. G. (2002). Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don't let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2-3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020294523516
  45. Stammerjohan, W. W., & Hall, S. C. (2003). Legal costs and accounting choices: Another test of the litigation hypothesis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30(5-6), 829–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.05418
  46. Tohumcuoğlu, İ. E. (2023). Kazanç yönetimi ile ertelenmiş vergiler arasındaki ilişkinin panel veri analizi ile test edilmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimlerde Yenilikçi Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasos.2023.535.1
  47. Tucker, J. W., & Zarowin, P. A. (2006). Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness? The Accounting Review, 81(1), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.251
  48. Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten-year perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-9603274032
  49. Zhou, M. (2016). Does accounting for uncertain tax benefits provide information about the relation between book tax differences and earnings persistence? Review of Accounting and Finance, 15(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-05-2014-0054