Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2013 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey’s Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis

Sayfa
49–72
Yayın Tarihi
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The paper concludes with potential uses of the dataset.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper provides a simple introduction to event data analysis, a quantitative data collection and analysis approach that has been used extensively for compiling broad datasets of foreign policy and other international behaviors.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This pilot study, which uses a single news source and covers a 23-year period (1990-2013) of foreign affairs in Turkey, was completed to evaluate the feasibility, time, cost, and possible problems that might be encountered with a full-scope study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The paper concludes with potential uses of the dataset.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Turkish foreign policy · Event data · Turkish foreign affairs

Abstract

This paper provides a simple introduction to event data analysis, a quantitative data collection and analysis approach that has been used extensively for compiling broad datasets of foreign policy and other international behaviors. The authors define the steps undertaken in creating the Turkish Foreign Affairs Event Dataset (TFAED). This pilot study, which uses a single news source and covers a 23-year period (1990-2013) of foreign affairs in Turkey, was completed to evaluate the feasibility, time, cost, and possible problems that might be encountered with a full-scope study. The paper describes the obstacles encountered during the pilot study’s initial phases and discusses a sample of the preliminary findings. The paper concludes with potential uses of the dataset.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Biltekin, G., Tüzüner, M. (2013). A Pilot Study of Quantifying Turkey’s Foreign Affairs: Data Generation, Challenges, and Preliminary Analysis. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 49–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/119795

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Aras, Bülent, and Hakan Fidan. “Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40 (2009): 195-217.
  2. Atlı, Altay. “Businessmen as Diplomats: The Role of Business Associations in Turkey’s Foreign Economic Policy.” Insight Turkey 13, no.1 (2011): 109-128.
  3. Aydınlı, Ersel and Musa Tuzuner, “Quantifying intelligence cooperation: The United States International Intelligence Behavior (USIIB) dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 48, no. 5 (2011): 673-682.
  4. Aydınlı, Ersel, Gonca Biltekin, and Musa Tuzuner. “Quantification of Turkey’s Foreign Affairs via Event Data.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Quantifying Security Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis in Turkey and the Greater Middle East, İstanbul, December 2-4, 2011.
  5. Aydınlı, Ersel, Gonca Biltekin, and Musa Tuzuner. “Time to Quantify Turkey’s Foreign Affairs: Setting Standards for a Maturing International Relations Discipline” (forthcoming). Azar, Edward E. “The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 24, no. 1 (1980): 143-152.
  6. Bacık, Gökhan. “Turkish-Israeli Relations after Davos: A View from Turkey.” Insight Turkey 11, no. 2 (2009): 31- 41. Bond, D., and W. B. Vogele. “Profiles of International Hotspots.” Unpublished manuscript, 1995.
  7. Center for International Affairs, Harvard University. Accessed August 19, 2011. http://vranet.com/papers.html.
  8. Bond, Doug, Joe Bond, Churl Oh, J. Craig Jenkins, and Charles Lewis Taylor. “Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development.” Journal of Peace Research 40, no. 6 (2003): 733-745. Is Turkey Departing From The West?” Uluslararası Hukuk ve Dış Politika 6, no. 21 (2010): 101-123.
  9. Renda, Kadri Kaan. “Turkey’s Neighbourhood Policy: An Emerging Complex Interdepence.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 1 (2011): 89-108.
  10. Rucht, D., R. Koopmans, and F. Neidhardt, eds. Acts of Dissent. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999.
  11. Schrodt, Philip A., Shannon G. Davis, and Judy L. Weddle. “Political Science: KEDS - A Program for the Machine Coding of Event Data.” Social Science Computer Review 12, no. 3 (1994): 561-588.
  12. Schrodt, Phillip A. TABARI Textual Analysis by Augmented Replacement Instructions Version 0.8.4 Manual, 2012,
  13. Schrodt, Philip A., and Deborah J. Gerner. Analyzing International Event Data (2001/2012),. E-book available at http://eventdata.psu.edu/papers.dir/automated.html.
  14. Schrodt, Philip A., and David Van Brackle. “Automated Coding of Political Ev