KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

After the Failed Military Coup: The Need for the Organizational Reform in the Turkish Military

Ramazan ERDAĞ
Sayfa
55–68
Yayın Tarihi
2019-01-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It also points out the need for organizational reform in the military; reform which should be done by the civilian government in order to cope with challenges.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The failed military coup of July 15, 2016, led by the Fetullah Terrorist Organization (FETO), indicates that military reform in Turkey at the operational level needs to be re-considered as an extremely urgent issue.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This article highlights the importance of reforms actualized at the strategic level during the Justice and Development Party era.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It also points out the need for organizational reform in the military; reform which should be done by the civilian government in order to cope with challenges.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Military reform · civil-military relations · AK Party

Abstract

The failed military coup of July 15, 2016, led by the Fetullah Terrorist Organization (FETO), indicates that military reform in Turkey at the operational level needs to be re-considered as an extremely urgent issue. The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) governments have made very notable structural changes in the military and have tried to control the military politically and organizationally. The need for military reform in Turkey derives from two primary reasons: the tendency of coup action and the need to improve the military’s effectiveness. This article highlights the importance of reforms actualized at the strategic level during the Justice and Development Party era. It also points out the need for organizational reform in the military; reform which should be done by the civilian government in order to cope with challenges.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDAĞ, R. (2019). After the Failed Military Coup: The Need for the Organizational Reform in the Turkish Military. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 55–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/119788

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Akça, İsmet. Türkiye’de Askeri-İktisadi Yapı: Durum, Sorunlar, Çözümler [Military-Economic Structure in Turkey: Situation, Problems, Solutions]. İstanbul: TESEV Publications, 2010.
  2. Altunışık, Meliha Benli. “Turkey’s Security Culture and Policy towards Iraq.” Perceptions 12 (2007): 69-88.
  3. Armutçu, Oya, and Bülent Sarıoğlu. “YAŞ’ın terfi ve emeklilik işlemleri yargı denetimi dışı [YAŞ’s promotion and retirement procedures are not subject to judicial review].” Hürriyet, March, 20, 2011. Accessed May 10, 2017. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yas-in- terfi-ve-emeklilik-islemleri-yargi-denetimi-disi-17321142. Aydınlı, Ersel, Nihat Ali Özcan, and Doğan Akyaz. “The Turkish Military’s March Toward Europe.” Foreign Affairs 85, no. 1 (2007): 77-90.
  4. Balcı, Ali. Dış Politikada Hesaplaşmak: AK Parti, Ordu ve Kemalizm [Confronting through Foreign Policy: AK Party, Military and Kemalism]. İstanbul: Etkileşim Yayınları, 2015.
  5. Bilgiç, Tuba Ünlü. “The Military and Europeanization Reforms in Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 45, no. 5 (2009): 803-24.
  6. Bland, Douglas L. “A Unified Theory of Civil-Military Relations.” Armed Forces & Society 26, no. 1 (1999): 7-25.
  7. Cizre, Ümit. “Demythologyzing the National Security Concept: The Case of Turkey.” The Middle East Journal 57, no. 2 (2003): 213-29.
  8. Cook, Steven A. Ruling but Not Governing: The Military and Political Development in Egypt, Algeria, and Turkey. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2007.
  9. Demirel, Tanel. “2000’li Yıllarda Asker ve Siyaset: Kontrollü Değişim ile Statüko Arasında Türk Ordusu [Military and Politics in 2000's: Turkish Army between Controlled Change and Status Quo].” SETA Analiz 18 (2010): 1-28. ———. “Civil-Military Relations in Turkey: Reflections on Two Notable Patterns of Civilian Behavior.” Turkish Studies 4, no. 3 (2003): 1-25.
  10. Edmunds, Timothy. “What are Armed Forces for? The Changing Nature of Military Roles in Europe.” International Affairs 82, no. 6 (2006): 1059-75.
  11. Erdağ, Ramazan. “Türkiye’nin Stratejik Kültürü ve Dış Politikada Yansıması [Turkey’s Strategic Culture and Reflection of Foreign Policy].” Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi 8, no. 1 (2013): 47-70.
  12. Feaver, Peter D. “The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control.” Armed Forces & Society 23, no. 2 (1996): 149-78. Hänggi, Heiner. “Conceptualising Security Sector Reform and Reconstruction.” In Reform and Reconstruction of the Security Sector in Reform and Reconstruction of the Security Sector, edited