KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2015 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

An Inter-Subsystemic Approach in International Relations

Haluk Özdemir
Sayfa
5–26
Yayın Tarihi
2015-01-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This agenda suggests a particular focus on the inconsistencies, contradictions, and challenges that lie at the intersections of different subsystems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The main point of departure for this article is the incapacity of current international relations theorizing to explain both change and continuity without shifting between levels of analysis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The previous research agenda on system studies was renounced before it realized its potential.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This agenda suggests a particular focus on the inconsistencies, contradictions, and challenges that lie at the intersections of different subsystems.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:System · strategic culture · subsystem

Abstract

The main point of departure for this article is the incapacity of current international relations theorizing to explain both change and continuity without shifting between levels of analysis. The previous research agenda on system studies was renounced before it realized its potential. The concept of a subsystem has great potential for resolving this challenge. This article argues that the properties of the international system, including anarchy, are not constant, and show variation. To factor in this variation, first we need to identify subsystems (e.g. geographical or functional) that diverge across issue areas and functions. Then we need to look at the interactions between subsystems, which is a neglected aspect of the literature on subsystems. This article contributes to the debate by setting out a new research agenda to study the interactions between subsystems and their effects on the general system; that is, to identify when the system is stable and when it changes. This agenda suggests a particular focus on the inconsistencies, contradictions, and challenges that lie at the intersections of different subsystems.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özdemir, H. (2015). An Inter-Subsystemic Approach in International Relations. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 5–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/119781

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Binder, Leonard. “The Middle East as Subordinate International System.” World Politics 10 (April 1958): 408-29.
  2. Boulding, Kenneth E. World as a Total System. London: Sage Publications, 1985.
  3. Brams, Steven J. “Transaction Flows in the International System.” The American Political Science Review 60 (December 1966): 880-98.
  4. Brecher, Michael. “International Relations and Asian Studies: The Subordinate State System of Southern Asia.” World Politics 15 (January 1963): 213-35.
  5. Brecher, Michael, and Hemda Ben Yehuda. “System and Crisis in International Politics.” Review of International Studies 11 (January 1985): 17-36.
  6. Brecher, Michael, and Patrick James. Crisis and Change in World Politics. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1986.
  7. Buzan, Barry. “The English School as a New Systems Theory of World Politics.” In New Systems Theories of World Politics, edited by Mathias Albert, Lars-Eric Cederman, and Alexander Wendt, 195-219. New York: Palgrave, 2010.
  8. Buzan, Barry, and Matthias Albert. “Differentiation: A Sociological Approach to International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 16, no. 3 (September 2010): 315-37.
  9. Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. International Systems in World History. Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  10. Christensen, Thomas J. “Conclusion: System Stability and the Security of the Most Vulnerable Significant Actor.” In Coping with Complexity in International System, 329-56.
  11. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1993. Cooper,Robert. “Post-Modern State and the New World Order.” Demos (2000).
  12. Deutsch, Karl W., and J. David Singer. “Multipolar Power Systems and International Stability.” World Politics 16 (April 1964): 390-405.
  13. Donnely, Jack. “The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.” International Organization 66, no. 4 (October 2012): 609-43.
  14. Genco, Stephen J. “Integration Theory and System Change in Western Europe: The Neglected Role of Systems Transformation Episodes.” In Change in the International System, edited by Ole R. Holsti, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alexander L. George, 55-80.
  15. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1980.
  16. Gray, Colin. “Strategic Culture as Context: the First Generation of Theory Strikes Back.” Review of International Studies 25, no. 1 (January 1999): 49-69.
  17. Hermann, Charles F., and Robert E. Mason. “Identifying Behavioral Attributes of Events That Trigger International Crises.” In Change in the International System, edited by Ole R. Holsti,