Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Unpacking the Post-Soviet: Political Legacy of the Tartu Semiotic School

Sayfa
31–46
Yayın Tarihi
2018-06-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ultimately, we use cultural semiotic notions and approaches for problematizing the concept of the post-Soviet with its conflictual split between reproducing archaic policies and discourses, on the one hand, and playing by the rules of the post-modern society, with entertainment, hybridity and the spirit of deconstruction as its pivots.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article sketches out general approach to using cultural semiotics as a cognitive tool for analyzing international relations in general and in post-Soviet area in particular.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The authors discuss how the homegrown school of cultural semiotics associated with the University of Tartu can be helpful for IR studies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ultimately, we use cultural semiotic notions and approaches for problematizing the concept of the post-Soviet with its conflictual split between reproducing archaic policies and discourses, on the one hand, and playing by the rules of the post-modern society, with entertainment, hybridity and the spirit of deconstruction as its pivots.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:post-Soviet transition · cultural semiotics

Abstract

This article sketches out general approach to using cultural semiotics as a cognitive tool for analyzing international relations in general and in post-Soviet area in particular. The authors discuss how the homegrown school of cultural semiotics associated with the University of Tartu can be helpful for IR studies. In this respect we place cultural semiotic knowledge in a multidisciplinary perspective and look for projections of its concepts into the vocabulary of foreign policy. Then we intend to discuss the Tartu school from a political perspective, thus claiming that its premium put on cultural issues renders strong politicizing effects. Ultimately, we use cultural semiotic notions and approaches for problematizing the concept of the post-Soviet with its conflictual split between reproducing archaic policies and discourses, on the one hand, and playing by the rules of the post-modern society, with entertainment, hybridity and the spirit of deconstruction as its pivots.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MAKARYCHEV, A., YATSYK, A. (2018). Unpacking the Post-Soviet: Political Legacy of the Tartu Semiotic School. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 31–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/119774

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Albert, Mathias. “From Territorial to Functional Space: Germany and the Baltic Sea Area.” Working Paper 39, Copenhagen Peace Research Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000. Arkhangel’skiy, Andrey. “Primirenie so zlodeistvom. Pochemu Patriarkh govorit ob uspekhakh pri Stalinizme.” Slon, November 9, 2015. https://republic.ru/posts/59277.
  2. Balzacq, Thierry. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 2 (2005): 171-201.
  3. Browning, Christopher, and Pertti Joenniemi. “Contending Discourses on Marginality: the Case of Kaliningrad.” Working Paper, Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, 2003.
  4. Chernomorsky, Pavel. “V Moskve vosstanovyat memorial’nuyu dosku na dome Brezhneva.” Slon, May 27, 2013. http://slon.ru/fast/russia/v-moskve-vosstanovyat-memorialnuyu-dosku-na-dome-brezhneva-946056.xhtml.
  5. Ciuta, Felix. “Security and the Problem of Context: A Hermeneutical Critique of Securitization Theory.” Review of International Studies 35 (2009): 301-26.
  6. Drulak, Petr. “The Problem of Structural Change in Alexander Wendt’s Social Theory of International Politics.” Journal of International Relations and Development 4, no. 4 (2001): 363-79.
  7. Gazarian, Karen. “SSSR v obiortke ot konfety.” Gazeta.ru, September 12, 2015. http://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2015/09/06_a_7742285.shtm.
  8. Gottdiener, Mark. Postmodern Semiotics: Material Culture and the Forms of Postmodern Life. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell, 1995.
  9. Gray, Colin. “Inescapable Geography.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 22, no. 2/3 (1999): 161-77.
  10. Gudkov, Lev. “Derealizatsiya proshlogo: funktsii stalinskogo mifa.” Pro et Contra, November – December 2012. http://carnegieendowment.org/files/ProEtContra_57_108-135.pdf.
  11. Joenniemi, Pertti, and Marko Lehti. “On the Encounter Between the Nordic and the Northern: Torn Apart but Meeting Again?” Working Paper 36, Copenhagen Peace Research Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001.
  12. Joseph, Jonathan. “Hegemony and the Structure-Agency Problem in International Relations: A Scientific Realist Contribution.” Review of International Studies 34, no. 1 (2008): 109-28.
  13. Kosterina, Irina, and Sergei Ushakin. “My u proshlogo ne uchimsia, my im zhiviom.” Neprikosnovenniy zapas 4, no. 102 (2015): 161-81.
  14. McDonald, Matt. “Securitization and the Construction of Security.” European Journal of International Relations 14, no. 4 (2008): 563-87.
  15. Medinsky, Vladimir. “Iz vsekh iskusstv vazhneishim dlia nas yavliaetsa