KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

An Eclectic Methodological Approach in Analyzing Foreign Policy: Turkey’s Foreign Policy Roles and Events Dataset (TFPRED)

İsmail Erkam SULA
Sayfa
255–283
Yayın Tarihi
2019-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It also explains the development of the eclectic methodological approach and gives an assessment of the author’s experiences in combining the two methods.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article describes the steps in developing an eclectic coding scheme that utilizes the Role theory framework.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Then, unlike the literature, it takes a step further and offers event data analysis to look at the performance of these NRCs as well.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It also explains the development of the eclectic methodological approach and gives an assessment of the author’s experiences in combining the two methods.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Content analysis · computational social science · event data

Abstract

This article describes the steps in developing an eclectic coding scheme that utilizes the Role theory framework. Role theory proposes that foreign policy is conducted with an attempt to fulfill the role conceptions that decision-makers formulate. Studies utilizing this framework usually identify national role conceptions (NRCs) in the foreign policy speeches of decision-makers with various research techniques. Following the literature, this article first explains how to use content analysis in identifying the most frequently referred NRCs in Turkish Foreign Policy (TFP). Then, unlike the literature, it takes a step further and offers event data analysis to look at the performance of these NRCs as well. With such an approach, it develops the Turkish Foreign Policy Roles and Events Dataset (TFPRED). The TFPRED is a dataset that is the product of a combination of ‘hand-coded content analysis’ with ‘computer-assisted event data analysis’. The article presents a detailed explanation of the steps in using content analysis and event data analysis to build the TFPRED. It also explains the development of the eclectic methodological approach and gives an assessment of the author’s experiences in combining the two methods.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SULA, İ. E. (2019). An Eclectic Methodological Approach in Analyzing Foreign Policy: Turkey’s Foreign Policy Roles and Events Dataset (TFPRED). All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 255–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/119735

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Aras, Bülent, and Aylin Görener. “National Role Conceptions and foreign policy orientation: the ideational bases of the Justice and Development Party’s Foreign Policy Activism in the Middle East.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 12 (2010): 73–93.
  2. Azar, Edward E. Conflict And Peace Data Bank (COPDAB), 1948–1978 [Computer file]. 3rd release. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, 1993. ———. “Editorial Notes.” International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations 5 (1979): 111–12.
  3. Baehr, R. “Trials and Errors: The Netherlands and Human Rights." in Human Rights and Comparative Foreign Policy, edited by David P. Forythe, 49–86.
  4. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 2000.
  5. Barnett, Michael N. “Institutions, Roles and Disorder, The Case of Arab State System.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (1993): 271–96.
  6. Bar-Tal, Daniel, and Dikla Antebi. “Beliefs about Negative Intentions of the World: A Study of Israeli Siege Mentality,” Political Psychology 13 (1992): 633–45.
  7. Bengttson, Rikard, and Ole Elgström. “Conflicting Role Conceptions? The European Union in Global Politics.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (2012): 93–108. Bloomfield Lincoln P. and Robert R. Beattie, CASCON Project: Local Conflict Data, 1945–1969. ICPSR05301-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 1999.
  8. Bond, Doug, Joe Bond, Churl Oh, J. Jenkins and Charles Lewis Taylor. “Integrated Data for Events Analysis (IDEA): An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development.” Journal of Peace Research 40 (2003): 733–45.
  9. Breuning, Marijke. “Words and Deeds: Foreign Assistance Rhetoric and Policy Behavior in the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom.” International Studies Quarterly 39 (1995): 235–54.
  10. Catalinac, Amy L. “Identity Theory and Foreign Policy: Explaining Japan’s Responses to the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 U.S. War in Iraq.” Politics & Policy 35 (2007): 58–100.
  11. Chafetz, G. “The Struggle for a National Identity in Post-Soviet Russia.” Political Science Quarterly 111, no. 4 (1996): 661–88.
  12. Chafetz, Glenn, Hillel Abramson, and Suzette Grillot. “Role Theory and Foreign Policy: Belarussian and Ukrainian Compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime.” Political Psychology 17 (1996): 727–57.
  13. Ghose, Guavav, and Patrick James. “Third-Party Intervention in Ethno–Religious Conflict: Role theory, Pakistan and War in Kashmir, 1965.”