KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun

Engin Sune
Sayfa
79–88
Yayın Tarihi
2016-01-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Barry Buzan and Richard Little, “World History and the development of non-Western International Relations Theory,” in

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 16-22.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 222.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Barry Buzan and Richard Little, “World History and the development of non-Western International Relations Theory,” in
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 16-22. Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 222. Barry Buzan and Richard Little, “World History and the development of non-Western International Relations Theory,” in

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sune, E. (2016). Non-Western International Relations Theory and Ibn Khaldun. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 79–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/119725

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. NY: Routledge, 2010.
  2. Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia,” Review of International Studies 34 (2008): 693-712.
  3. Balakrishnan, Rajagopal. International Law From Below: Development, Social Movements, and Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  4. Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. “World History and the Development of Non-Western International Relations Wallerstein, “Eurocentrism,” 21-39.
  5. Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 6. Acharya and Buzan, Non-Western IR Theory, 10. Wallerstein, “Eurocentrism,” 94-101. Theory.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, edited by Acharya and Buzan, 197-220. NY: Routledge. Cox, Robert. “Towards a Post-Hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun.” In Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. Rosenau and E. Czempiel, 132-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
  6. Hobson, John M. “What is at Stake in Bringing Historical Sociology Back into International Relations? Transcending Chronofetishism and Tempocentrism in International Relations.” In Historical Sociology of International Relations, edited by S. Hobden and J. M. Hobson, 3-41. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  7. Kalpakian, Jack. “Ibn Khaldun’s Influence On Current International Relations Theory.” The Journal of North African Studies 13, no. 3 (2008): 363-76.
  8. Say, Seyfi. İbn Haldun’un Düşünce Sistemi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramı [Ibn Khaldun’s System of Thought and International Relations Theory]. İstanbul: İlk Harf Yayınları, 2012.
  9. Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou. “International Relations Theory and the Islamic Worldview.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, edited by Acharya and Buzan, 174-96. NY: Routledge, 2010.
  10. Wallerstein, Immanuel. “Eurorcentrism and Its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science.” Sociological Bulletin 46, no. 1 (1997): 21-39.