KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Professionalization, Local Military Context, and Reconstruction of the Army in Afghanistan

Cenker Korhan DEMİR
Sayfa
81–97
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It also aims to contribute methodologically by building upon the first-hand impressions of practitioners from various countries over their reconstruction activities.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Security sector reconstruction is a long-debated topic in the peacekeeping and state-building literature.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The primary goal of any reconstruction program in conflict-ridden countries is to build up security institutions, which are prerequisites for sustainable development and democratization.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It also aims to contribute methodologically by building upon the first-hand impressions of practitioners from various countries over their reconstruction activities.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Afghanistan · reconstruction · security

Abstract

Security sector reconstruction is a long-debated topic in the peacekeeping and state-building literature. The primary goal of any reconstruction program in conflict-ridden countries is to build up security institutions, which are prerequisites for sustainable development and democratization. This study aims to examine how security sector institutions, specifically the armed forces, have been reconstructed by intervening actors in post-conflict countries like Afghanistan. It argues that army reconstruction programs that are developed without any elaboration of the peculiar conditions of the related post-conflict countries, are unlikely to be successful. As such, initiatives aimed at security sector reconstruction need to take account of the idiosyncratic characteristics of the conflict affected country and its institutions, and the program should be devised conforming to the case-specific circumstances. This research aims to identify reliable evidence to support this argument by analyzing data collected from both primary and secondary resources. It also aims to contribute methodologically by building upon the first-hand impressions of practitioners from various countries over their reconstruction activities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİR, C. K. (2020). Professionalization, Local Military Context, and Reconstruction of the Army in Afghanistan. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 81–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/119723

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ansorg, Nadine, and Eleanor Gordon. “Co-operation, Contestation and Complexity in Post-Conflict Security Sector Reform.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 13, no.1 (2019): 2–24.
  2. Bellin, Eva. “The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East.” Comparative Politics 36, no. 2 (2004): 139–57.
  3. Bensahel, Nora. “Mission Not Accomplished: What Went Wrong with Iraqi Reconstruction.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 29, no. 3 (2006): 453–73.
  4. Brzoska, Michael. “Introduction: Criteria for Evaluating Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Security Sector Reform in Peace Support Operations.” International Peacekeeping 13, no. 1 (2006): 1–13.
  5. Brzoska, Michael, and Andreas Heinemann-Grüder. “Security Sector Reform and Post-Conflict Reconstruction under International Auspices.” In Reform and Reconstruction of the Security Sector, edited by Alan Bryden and Heiner Hänggi, 121–42. Geneva: Center for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2004.
  6. Chanaa, Jane. Security Sector Reform: Issues, Challenges and Prospects. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
  7. Cronin, Stephanie. Armies and State-building in the Modern Middle East: Politics, Nationalism and Military Reform. London: I.B. Tauris, 2014.
  8. Fukuyama, Francis. “Building Democracy After Conflict: Stateness First.” Journal of Democracy 16, no.1 (2005): 84–8.
  9. Gaub, Florence. Rebuilding Armed Forces: Learning from Iraq and Lebanon. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, 2011.
  10. Giustozzi, Antonio. “Auxiliary Force or National Army? Afghanistan’s ‘ANA’ and the Counter-Insurgency Effort, 2002–2006.” Small Wars and Insurgencies 18, no. 1 (2007): 45–67.
  11. Grissom, Adam. “Shoulder-to-Shoulder Fighting Different Wars: NATO Advisors and Military Adaptation in the Afghan National Army 2001-2011.” In Military Adaptation in Afghanistan, edited by Theo Farrell, Frans Osinga, and James A. Russell, 263–87. California: Stanford University Press, 2013. Hänggi, Heiner. “Conceptualizing Security Sector Reform and Reconstruction.” In Reform and Reconstruction of the Security Sector, edited by Alan Bryden and Heiner Hänggi, 1–11. Geneva: Center for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2004. Hänggi, Heiner, and Vincenza Scherrer. “Towards an Integrated Security Sector Reform Approach in UN Peace Operations.” International Peacekeeping 15, no. 4 (2008): 486–500.
  12. Huntington, Samuel. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957.
  13. Jackson, Paul. “Security Sector Reform