KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sosyoekonomi / 2026 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 64

Optimal Nüfus ve Ekolojik Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye için Bir ARDL Yaklaşımı

Optimal Population and Ecological Sustainability: An ARDL Approach for Türkiye

Başak Karşıyakalı(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3835-0175
Mehmet Çetin(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6954-0908
Sayfa
535–556
Yayın Tarihi
2025-04-26
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Beşerî faaliyetlerin neden olduğu tahribatın şiddeti, ekolojik ayak izinin biyolojik kapasiteyi aşması ile de kendisini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Demografik bir unsur olan nüfus, iktisadın teorik ve politik anlamda önemli konularından birini oluşturmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Sanayi Devrimi’nden sonraki süreçte dünya nüfusunun, kişi başına gelirden daha hızlı artması küresel doğal sermaye stokunu hızla aşındırmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Beşerî faaliyetlerin neden olduğu tahribatın şiddeti, ekolojik ayak izinin biyolojik kapasiteyi aşması ile de kendisini göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Optimal Nüfus · Ekolojik Ayak İzi · Biyolojik Kapasite

Özet

Demografik bir unsur olan nüfus, iktisadın teorik ve politik anlamda önemli konularından birini oluşturmaktadır. Sanayi Devrimi’nden sonraki süreçte dünya nüfusunun, kişi başına gelirden daha hızlı artması küresel doğal sermaye stokunu hızla aşındırmıştır. Beşerî faaliyetlerin neden olduğu tahribatın şiddeti, ekolojik ayak izinin biyolojik kapasiteyi aşması ile de kendisini göstermektedir. Birleşmiş Milletler Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri’nin merkezinde insanın ekonomik faaliyetleri ve onun ekolojik ayak izini azaltma çabasının yer alması, dikkatleri yeniden nüfus düzeyine çekmiştir. Bu çalışmada ekolojik ve ekonomik hedefler bağlamında Türkiye için optimal nüfus düzeyinin ne olması gerektiği ARDL yöntemiyle araştırılmıştır. Bulgular refah düzeyinin artırılması ve kaynakların sürdürülebilirliği açısından Türkiye’nin nüfus düzeyinin olması gerekenin çok üzerinde olduğunu göstermektedir.

Abstract

As a demographic element, population constitutes one of the most important theoretical and political issues in economics. During the period following the Industrial Revolution, the world population grew faster than per capita income, rapidly depleting the global stock of natural capital. The severity of the destruction caused by human activities is reflected in the ecological footprint exceeding the biological capacity. The focus of the UN Sustainable Development Goals on human economic activity and reducing its environmental impact has brought attention back to the issue of population growth and its impact on the environment. This study employs the ARDL method to determine the optimal population level for Türkiye, taking into account both ecological and economic objectives. The findings indicate that Türkiye’s population level is much higher than it should be in terms of increasing welfare and resource sustainability.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Karşıyakalı, B., Çetin, M. (2025). Optimal Nüfus ve Ekolojik Sürdürülebilirlik: Türkiye için Bir ARDL Yaklaşımı. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 64, 535–556. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2025.02.23

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (80)

  1. Arrhenius, G. & G. Duus-Otterström (2024), “Fair Population Reduction” in: G. Arrhenius et al. (eds.), Sustainable Population in the Time of Climate Change (18-22), Stockholm: Institute For Futures Studies.
  2. Asteriou, D. & S.G. Hall (2021), Applied Econometrics, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  3. Barbier, E.B. & J.C. Burgess (2019), “Sustainable Development Goal Indicators: Analyzing Trade-offs and Complementarities”, World Development, 122, 295-305.
  4. Charbit, Y. (2009), Economic, Social and Demographic Thought in the XIXth Century, The Population Debate from Malthus to Marx, Paris: Springer.
  5. Chau, K.W. & G. Zou (2018), “Energy Prices, Real Estate Sales and Industrial Output in China”, Energies, 11(7), 1847.
  6. Cohen, J.E. (1995), “Population Growth and Earth’s Human Carrying Capacity”, Science, 269(5222), 341-346.
  7. Daily, G.C. et al. (1994), “Optimum Human Population Size”, Population and Environment, 15(6), 469-475.
  8. Dalton, H. (1928), “The Theory of Population”, Economica, 22, 28-50.
  9. Daly, H.E. & J. Farley (2011), Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications, Washington: Island Press.
  10. Daly, H.E. (2008), “The Steady-State Economy”, in: Sustainable Development Commission, Confronting Structure-Achieving Economic Sustainability,, 17.06.2024.
  11. Dasgupta, P. et al. (2023), “Population, Ecological Footprint and The Sustainable Development Goals”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 84(3), 659-675.
  12. Dasgupta, P.S. (1969), “On The Concept of Optimum Population”, The Review of Economic Studies, 36(3), 295-318.
  13. Ehrlich, P.R. & A.H. Ehrlich (2009), “The Population Bomb Revisited”, The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development, 1(3), 63-71.
  14. Ehrlich, P.R. & A.H. Ehrlich. (1991), The Most Overpopulated Nation, NPG Optimum Population Series.
  15. Ehrlich, P.R. & J.P. Holdren (1971), “Impact of Population Growth: Complacency Concerning This Component of Man’s Predicament is Unjustified and Counterproductive”, Science, 171(3977), 1212-1217.
  16. Ehrlich, P.R. et al. (1993), “Food Security, Population and Environment”, Population and Development Review, 19(1), 1-32.
  17. Ertürk, M. (2016), “The Relation Between Environmental Pollution and Economic Growth A Comparison of Developed and Developing Countries Using Data Visualization”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive,, 30.10.2024.
  18. Girard, A. (2020), “Présentation”, in: A. Landry (ed.), La Révolution Démograpfique (23-41), Paris: Ined Éditions.
  19. Global Footprint Network (N/A), Open Data Platform,, 02.06.2024.
  20. Granger, C.W.J. & P. Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
  21. Grossman, G.M. & A.B. Krueger (1995), “Economic Growth and the Environment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377.
  22. Harris, R. & R. Sollis (2003), Applied Time Series, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  23. Huxley, J. (1956), “World Population”, Scientific American, 194(3), 64-80.
  24. Johansen, S. & K. Juselius (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to The Demand for Money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
  25. Knibbs, G.H. (1917), The Mathematical Theory of Population, of its Character and Fluctuations and of the Factors which Influence Them, Appendix A, Vol. 1, Census of the Commonwealth of Australia, Aust. Govt. Printer, Melbourne.
  26. Lianos, T.P. & A. Pseiridis (2016), “Sustainable Welfare and Optimum Population Size”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18, 1679-1699.
  27. Lianos, T.P. (2013), “The World Budget Constraint”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15, 1543-1553.
  28. Lianos, T.P. (2018), “Steady State Economy at Optimal Population Size”, The Journal of Population and Sustainability, 3(1), 75-99.
  29. Lianos, T.P. (2019), “Environment, Poverty and The Steady State Economy”, The Journal of Population and Sustainability, 3(2), 55-78.
  30. Lianos, T.P. et al. (2022), “Population and Economic Growth in Developed Countries”, International Review of Applied Economics, 36(4), 608-621.
  31. Lundahl, M. (2015), Seven Figures in the History of Swedish Economic Thought, London: Palgrave Macmillan Books.
  32. Malthus, T. (1998), An Essay on the Principle of Population, Electronic Scholarly Publishing.
  33. Managi, S. & P. Kumar (2018), Inclusive Wealth Report 2018, New York: Taylor & Francis.
  34. Meadows, D.H. et al. (1972), The Limits to Growth, New York: Potomac Associates-Universe Books.
  35. Mehmood, U. et al. (2023), “Associationg Economic Growth and Ecological Footprints through Humand Capital and Biocapacity in South Asia”, World, 4(3), 598-611.
  36. Mill, J.S. (2004), Principles of Political Economy, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  37. Narayan, P.K. & R. Smyth (2005), “Trade Liberalization and Economic Growth in Fiji. An Empirical Assessment Using the ARDL Approach”, Journal of The Asia Pacific Economy, 10(1), 96-115.
  38. Narayan, P.K. & R. Smyth (2006), “What Determines Migration Flows from Low-Income to High-Income Countries? An Empirical Investigation of Fiji-U.S. Migration 1972-2001”, Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(2), 332-342.
  39. Narayan, P.K. & S. Narayan (2005), “Estimating Income and Price Elasticities of Imports For Fiji in a Cointegration Framework”, Economic Modelling, 22(3), 423-438.
  40. Narayan, P.K. (2004), “Reformulating Critical Values for the Bounds F-statistics Approach to Cointegration: An Application to the Tourism Demand Model for Fiji”, Monash University Department of Economics Discussion Paper, 02/04, Monash University.
  41. Narayan, P.K. (2005), “The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration tests”, Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990.
  42. Nelson, R.R. (1956), “A Theory of Low-level Equilibrium Trap”, American Economic Review, 46(5), 894-908.
  43. O’Neill, D. et al. (2010), “Enough is Enough: Ideas for a Sustainable Economy in a World of Finite Resources”, Steady State Economy Conference, Leeds.
  44. Open Data Platform (N/A),, 27.04.2024.
  45. Oxford Climate Society (N/A), Ecological Debt: What is it and Why Does it Matter?,, 27.06.2024.
  46. Özgür, M.E. (2017), “Nüfus Dinamikleri, Çevre ve Sürdürülebilirlik”, Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 1-26.
  47. Pesaran, M.H. et al. (2001), “Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  48. Pimentel, D. (2012), “World Overpopulation”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14, 151-152.
  49. Pimentel, D. et al. (1994), “Natural Resources and an Optimum Human Population”, Population and Environment, 15, 347-369.
  50. Pimentel, D. et al. (1998), “An Optimum Population for North and Latin America”, Population and Environment, 20(2), 125-148.
  51. Samways, D. (2022), “Population and Sustainability: Reviewing the Relationship Between Population Growth and Environmental Change”, The Journal of Population and Sustainability, 6(1), 15-41.
  52. Schade, C. & D. Pimentel (2010), “Population Crash: Prospects for Famine in The Twenty-first Century”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12, 245-262.
  53. Schaefer, F. et al. (2006), “Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity: The World’s Ability to Regenerate Resources and Absorb Waste in a Limited Time Period”, European Commission Working Paper and Studies,, 30.03.2024.
  54. Shibata, R. (1981), “An Optimal Selection of Regression Variable”, Biometrika, 68(1), 45-54.
  55. Smith, A. (2009), Wealth of Nations, Amsterdam: MLibri.
  56. Statista The Statistics Portal for Market Data (N/A),, 30.04.2024.
  57. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (N/A), On İkinci Kalkınma Planı (2024-2028),, 30.03.2024.
  58. Temurshoev, U. (2006), “Population Haven Hypothesis or Factor Endowment Hypothesis: Theory and Empirical Examination for the US and China”, CERGE-EI Working Paper No. 292.
  59. Toprak, A.O. (2023), “Relationship Between Biocapacity Efficieny and Economic Growth: Sur Model Analysis for Europe”, Yönetim Bilimler Dergisi, 21(Cumhuriyetin 100. Yılı Özel Sayısı), 789-806.
  60. Tucker, C. (2019), A Planet of 3 Billion, Washington D.C., Atlas Observatory.
  61. TÜİK Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (N/A),, 30.03.2024.
  62. UN United Nations (N/A), Sustainable Development Goals,, 24.06.2024.
  63. WB World Bank (N/A), DataBank: World Development Indicator,, 22.06.2024.
  64. Wickens, C.H. (1988), “Carrying Capacity and Population Optimum”, Journal of Australian Population Association, 5(1), 163-184.
  65. Wiley, D. (2000), “An Optimum World Population”, Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 16(1), 72-93.
  66. Wolfe, A.B. (1934), “On The Criterion of Optimum Population”, American Journal of Sociology, 39(5), 585-599.
  67. WWF World Wide Fund for Nature - Türkiye (2012), Türkiye’nin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Raporu,, 30.05.2024.
  68. Zimmermann, K.F. (1989), “Optimum Population: An Introduction”, in: K.F. Zimmermann (ed.), Economic Theory of Optimal Population (1-16), Berlin: Springer.
  69. Daly, H.E. (2008), “The Steady-State Economy”, in: Sustainable Development Commission, Confronting Structure-Achieving Economic Sustainability,, 17.06.2024.
  70. Ertürk, M. (2016), “The Relation Between Environmental Pollution and Economic Growth A Comparison of Developed and Developing Countries Using Data Visualization”, Munich Personal RePEc Archive,, 30.10.2024.
  71. Global Footprint Network (N/A), Open Data Platform,, 02.06.2024.
  72. Open Data Platform (N/A),, 27.04.2024.
  73. Oxford Climate Society (N/A), Ecological Debt: What is it and Why Does it Matter?,, 27.06.2024.
  74. Schaefer, F. et al. (2006), “Ecological Footprint and Biocapacity: The World’s Ability to Regenerate Resources and Absorb Waste in a Limited Time Period”, European Commission Working Paper and Studies,, 30.03.2024.
  75. Statista The Statistics Portal for Market Data (N/A),, 30.04.2024.
  76. T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (N/A), On İkinci Kalkınma Planı (2024-2028),, 30.03.2024.
  77. TÜİK Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (N/A),, 30.03.2024.
  78. UN United Nations (N/A), Sustainable Development Goals,, 24.06.2024.
  79. WB World Bank (N/A), DataBank: World Development Indicator,, 22.06.2024.
  80. WWF World Wide Fund for Nature - Türkiye (2012), Türkiye’nin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Raporu,, 30.05.2024.