KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sosyoekonomi / 2026 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 64

Yenilenebilir Enerji Difüzyon Patikası ve Bilgi Difüzyonu Temelinde Sosyoekonomik Etkileşimler: Türkiye’de Fotovoltaik Sistem

Diffusion Pathways of Renewable Energy and Socioeconomic Interactions Based on Knowledge Diffusion: Photovoltaic Systems in Türkiye

Özlem Fikirli(BARTIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, İKTİSAT BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-4003-7276
Hasan Şahin(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SİYASAL BİLGİLER FAKÜLTESİ, İKTİSAT BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-5922-068X
Sayfa
363–398
Yayın Tarihi
2025-04-26
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elde edilen bulgulara göre etkileşim içerisinde bulunan hanelerin PV sisteme geçişi, diğer hanelerin adaptasyonunu pozitif yönde etkilemektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de fotovoltaik (PV) sistem difüzyon sürecinin ve bu süreçte bilgi difüzyonunu sağlayan sosyal etkileşimlerin rolünün araştırılmasıdır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çalışmada politika değişiklikleri ve farklı senaryolar altında difüzyon süreci ekonometrik modelleme ile ajan bazlı modelleme kombinasyonundan oluşan hibrit bir modelle incelenmektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elde edilen bulgulara göre etkileşim içerisinde bulunan hanelerin PV sisteme geçişi, diğer hanelerin adaptasyonunu pozitif yönde etkilemektedir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Fotovoltaik Sistem · Yenilenebilir Enerji · Bilgi Ekonomisi

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de fotovoltaik (PV) sistem difüzyon sürecinin ve bu süreçte bilgi difüzyonunu sağlayan sosyal etkileşimlerin rolünün araştırılmasıdır. Çalışmada politika değişiklikleri ve farklı senaryolar altında difüzyon süreci ekonometrik modelleme ile ajan bazlı modelleme kombinasyonundan oluşan hibrit bir modelle incelenmektedir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre etkileşim içerisinde bulunan hanelerin PV sisteme geçişi, diğer hanelerin adaptasyonunu pozitif yönde etkilemektedir. Geri ödeme sürelerinin azaltılması gibi politikalar yenilenebilir enerji üretimini artırsa da yenilenebilir enerjinin toplam enerji içerisindeki payının artırılması için zorunlu PV sisteme geçiş uygulamalarına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

Abstract

This study investigates the diffusion process of photovoltaic (PV) systems and the role of social interactions that facilitate knowledge diffusion in Türkiye. Policy changes and the diffusion process under different scenarios are examined through a hybrid model that consists of econometric and agent-based modelling. According to the findings, the adoption of PV systems by interacting households has a positive influence on the adoption of these systems by other households. Policies such as reducing payback periods would enhance renewable energy production. Yet, a mandatory transition to PV systems may be necessary to increase the share of renewable energy in total energy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Fikirli, Ö., Şahin, H. (2025). Yenilenebilir Enerji Difüzyon Patikası ve Bilgi Difüzyonu Temelinde Sosyoekonomik Etkileşimler: Türkiye’de Fotovoltaik Sistem. Sosyoekonomi, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 64, 363–398. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2025.02.16

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (80)

  1. Acar, A. vd. (2020), Binalarda Çatı Üstü Güneş Enerjisi Potansiyeli - Türkiye’de Çatı Üstü Güneş Enerjisi Sistemlerinin Hayata Geçmesi için Finansman Modelleri ve Politikalar, SHURA Enerji Dönüşümü Merkezi, Sabancı Üniversitesi.
  2. Ameli, N. & N. Brandt (2015), “Determinants of Households’ Investment in Energy Efficiency and Renewables: Evidence From The OECD Survey on Household Environmental Behaviour and Attitudes”, Environmental Research Letters, 10(4), 044015.
  3. Bal, H. (2009), “Sermaye Bütçelemesi Yatırım Kararlarında Özkaynağa Nakit Akımı Yönteminin Kullanılması ve Projeye Nakit Akımı Yöntemi ile Karşılaştırılması”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 219-236.
  4. Bashiri, A. & S.H. Alizadeh (2018), “The Analysis of Demographics, Environmental and Knowledge Factors Affecting Prospective Residential PV System Adoption: A Study in Tehran”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 3131-3139.
  5. Best, R. & A. Chareunsy (2022), “The impact of income on household solar panel uptake: Exploring diverse results using Australian data”, Energy Economics, 112, 106124.
  6. Bhattacharjee, U. et al. (2018), Turkey-Rooftop Solar Market Assessment: Summary Note, The World Bank, No. 123720.
  7. Boumaiza, A. et al. (2018), “Modeling the impact of innovation diffusion on solar PV adoption in city neighborhoods”, International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 8(3), 1749-1762.
  8. Cebeci, S. (2017), “Türkiye’de Güneş Enerjisinden Elektrik Üretim Potansiyelinin Değerlendirilmesi”, Uzmanlık Tezi, T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı, İktisadi Sektörler ve Koordinasyon Genel Müdürlüğü, Yayın No: 2977.
  9. Chappin, E.J. & G.P. Dijkema (2010), “Agent-Based Modelling of Energy Infrastructure Transitions”, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 6(2), 106-130.
  10. Chen, K.K. (2014), “Assessing The Effects of Customer Innovativeness, Environmental Value and Ecological Lifestyles on Residential Solar Power Systems Install Intention”, Energy Policy, 67, 951-961.
  11. Denholm, P. et al.(2009), Break-Even Cost for Residential Photovoltaics in The United States: Key Drivers and Sensitivities, National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), No. NREL/TP-6A2-46909, Golden, CO (United States).
  12. Dharshing, S. (2017), “Household Dynamics of Technology Adoption: A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Residential Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Systems in Germany”, Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 113-124.
  13. Dinçer, F. (2011), “Türkiye’de Güneş Enerjisinden Elektrik Üretimi Potansiyeli-Ekonomik Analizi ve AB Ülkeleri ile Karşılaştırmalı Değerlendirme”, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 14(1), 8-17.
  14. Drury, E. et al. (2011), Impact of Different Economic Performance Metrics on The Perceived Value of Solar Photovoltaics, National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), No. NREL/TP-6A20-52197, Golden, CO (United States).
  15. Duman, A.C. & Ö. Güler (2020), “Economic Analysis of Grid-Connected Residential Rooftop PV Systems in Turkey”, Renewable Energy, 148, 697-711.
  16. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (2010), Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı Stratejik Planı (2010-2014),, 02.03.2023.
  17. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (2014), Türkiye Ulusal Yenilenebilir Enerji Eylem Planı (Aralık 2014),, 02.03.2023.
  18. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (2019), Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı 2019-2023 Stratejik Planı,, 02.03.2023.
  19. EPIA European Photovoltaic Industry Association (2011), Solar Generation 6: Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Empowering The World, Brussels, Belgium.
  20. Eppstein, M.J. et al. (2011), “An Agent-Based Model to Study Market Penetration of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles”, Energy Policy, 39(6), 3789-3802.
  21. ESP Europe Solar Power (2020), Global Market Outlook for Solar Power/2020-2024, Brussels, Belgium.
  22. Fagiolo, G. et al. (2007), “A Critical Guide to Empirical Validation Of Agent-Based Models in Economics: Methodologies, Procedures, and Open Problems”, Computational Economics, 30(3), 195-226.
  23. Farber, A. et al. (2006), “A General Formula for The WACC”, International Journal of Business, 11(2), 211-218.
  24. Flora, A. et al. (2019), Yeni Teşvikler Türkiye’nin Çatı Tipi Güneş Enerjisi Sektörünü Aydınlatıyor, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.
  25. Fouladvand, J. et al. (2022), “Energy security in community energy systems: An agent-based modelling approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, 132765.
  26. Garcia, R. & W. Jager (2011), “From The Special Issue Editors: Agent‐Based Modeling of Innovation Diffusion”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 148-151.
  27. Güngül, M. et al. (2018), “Türkiye’de Konutlarda Güneş Enerjisinden Elektrik Üretiminin TOPSIS Yöntemiyle Analizi”, Ulusal Çevre Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 1(3), 133-144.
  28. Güzel, A. & A. Cingöz (2016), “Proje Değerlendirmede Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Dinamik Ortalama Sermaye Maliyeti”, Ekonomi İşletme Siyaset ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 2(2), 31-68.
  29. Huang, X. et al. (2021), “Agent-based modelling for market acceptance of electric vehicles: evidence from China”, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 206-217.
  30. Iachini, V. et al. (2015), “Agent Based Simulation of Incentive Mechanisms on Photovoltaic Adoption”, in: Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (136-148), Springer, Cham.
  31. IRENA International Renewable Energy Agency (2024), Renewable Energy Statistics 2024, Abu Dhabi.
  32. Kalaycıoğlu, S. et al. (2010), “Temsili Bir Örneklemde Sosyo-Ekonomik Statü (SES) Ölçüm Aracı Geliştirilmesi: Ankara Kent Merkezi Örneği”, Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 182-220.
  33. Karimi, M.J. & S. Vaez-Zadeh (2021), “An agent-based model for electric energy policy assessment”, Electric Power Systems Research, 192, 106903.
  34. Korcaj, L. et al. (2015), “Intentions to Adopt Photovoltaic Systems Depend on Homeowners’ Expected Personal Gains and Behavior of Peers”, Renewable Energy, 75, 407-415.
  35. Kost, C. et al. (2012), Studie Stromgestehungskosten Erneuerbare Energien, Fraunhofer ISE.
  36. Kuzmin, E. et al. (2024), “Digitalization of the energy sector in its transition towards renewable energy: A role of ICT and human capital”, Energy Strategy Reviews, 53, 101418.
  37. Kwan, C.L. (2012), “Influence of Local Environmental, Social, Economic and Political Variables on The Spatial Distribution of Residential Solar PV Arrays Across The United States”, Energy Policy, 47, 332-344.
  38. Ma, T. & Y. Nakamori (2009), “Modeling Technological Change in Energy Systems-From Optimization to Agent-Based Modeling”, Energy, 34(7), 873-879.
  39. Macal, C.M. & M.J. North (2010), “Tutorial on Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation”, Journal of Simulation, 4, 151-162.
  40. Mahn, D. et al. (2024), “What drives solar energy adoption in developing countries? Evidence from household surveys across countries”, Energy Economics, 138, 107815.
  41. McCoy, D. & S. Lyons (2014), “Consumer Preferences and The Influence of Networks in Electric Vehicle Diffusion: An Agent-Based Microsimulation in Ireland”, Energy Research & Social Science, 3, 89-101.
  42. Meade, N. & T. Islam (2006), “Modelling and Forecasting The Diffusion of Innovation-A 25-Year Review”, International Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 519-545.
  43. Menyeh, B.O. (2021), “Financing electricity access in Africa: A choice experiment study of household investor preferences for renewable energy investments in Ghana”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 146, 111132.
  44. Mian, M.A. & I. Vélez-Pareja (2008), “Applicability of The Classic WACC Concept in Practice”, Latin American Business Review, 8(2), 19-40.
  45. Modis, T. (2007), “Strengths and Weaknesses of S-Curves”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 74(6), 866-872.
  46. Muhammad-Sukki, F. et al. (2014), “Feed-In Tariff for Solar Photovoltaic: The Rise of Japan”, Renewable Energy, 68, 636-643.
  47. Nazari, Z. & P. Musilek (2023), “Impact of Digital Transformation on The Energy Sector: A Review”, Algorithms, 16(4), 211.
  48. Olabi, A.G. et al. (2023), “Energy Digitalization: Main categories, Applications, Merits and Barriers”, Energy, 271: 126899.
  49. OWID Our World in Data (N/A),, 18.03.2021.
  50. OWID Our World in Data (N/A),, 11.10.2024.
  51. Palmer, J. et al. (2015), “Modeling The Diffusion of Residential Photovoltaic Systems in Italy: An Agent-Based Simulation”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 106-131.
  52. Pearce, P. & R. Slade (2018), “Feed-In Tariffs For Solar Microgeneration: Policy Evaluation and Capacity Projections Using A Realistic Agent-Based Model”, Energy Policy, 116, 95-111.
  53. Peralta, A.A. et al. (2022), “Spatio-temporal modelling of solar photovoltaic adoption: An integrated neural networks and agent-based modelling approach”, Applied Energy, 305, 117949.
  54. Phillips, F. (2007), “On S-Curves and Tipping Points”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(6), 715-730.
  55. Plötz, P. et al. (2014), “Modelling Market Diffusion of Electric Vehicles with Real World Driving Data - Part I: Model Structure and Validation”, Ecological Economics, 107, 411-421.
  56. Rahut, D.B. et al. (2017), “Factors Determining Household Use of Clean and Renewable Energy Sources for Lighting in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 661-672.
  57. Rai, V. & K. McAndrews (2012), “Decision-Making and Behavior Change in Residential Adopters of Solar PV”, Proceedings of the World Renewable Energy Forum.
  58. Rai, V. & S.A. Robinson (2015), “Agent-Based Modeling of Energy Technology Adoption: Empirical Integration of Social, Behavioral, Economic, and Environmental Factors”, Environmental Modelling & Software, 70, 163-177.
  59. Ramshani, M. et al. (2020), “An agent-based approach to study the diffusion rate and the effect of policies on joint placement of photovoltaic panels and green roof under climate change uncertainty”, Applied Energy, 261, 114402.
  60. Rogers, E. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations (3rd edition), USA: The Free Press.
  61. Schreinemachers, P. et al. (2009), “The Diffusion of Greenhouse Agriculture in Northern Thailand: Combining Econometrics and Agent‐Based Modeling”, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(4), 513-536.
  62. Shafiei, E. et al. (2012), “An Agent-Based Modeling Approach to Predict The Evolution of Market Share of Electric Vehicles: A Case Study From Iceland”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1638-1653.
  63. Sow, A. et al. (2019), “Economic Analysis of Residential Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production in Canada”, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 33, 83-94.
  64. Stavrakas, V. et al. (2019), “An Agent-Based Model to Simulate Technology Adoption Quantifying Behavioural Uncertainty of Consumers”, Applied Energy, 255, 113795.
  65. Sun, Y.W. et al. (2013), “GIS-Based Approach for Potential Analysis of Solar PV Generation at The Regional Scale: A Case Study of Fujian Province”, Energy Policy, 58, 248-259.
  66. Tian, S. & S. Chang (2020), “An agent-based model of household energy consumption”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118378.
  67. Tran, M. (2012), “Agent-Behaviour and Network Influence on Energy Innovation Diffusion”, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 17(9), 3682-3695.
  68. TÜİK (2020), Hanehalkı Bütçe İstatistikleri Mikro Veri Seti,, 02.03.2023.
  69. Van Benthem, A. et al. (2008), “Learning-By-Doing and The Optimal Solar Policy in California”, The Energy Journal, 29(3), 131-152.
  70. Van der Kam, M.J. et al. (2018), “Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Systems and Electric Vehicles among Dutch Consumers: Implications for The Energy Transition”, Energy Research and Social Science, 46, 68-85.
  71. Watts, D.J. & S.H. Strogatz (1998), “Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks”, Nature, 393(6684), 440-442.
  72. Xu, X. et al. (2020), “A multi-agent reinforcement learning-based data-driven method for home energy management”, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(4), 3201-3211.
  73. Zhai, P. & E.D. Williams (2012), “Analyzing Consumer Acceptance of Photovoltaics (PV) Using Fuzzy Logic Model”, Renewable Energy, 41, 350-357.
  74. Zhao, J. et al. (2011), “Hybrid Agent-Based Simulation for Policy Evaluation of Solar Power Generation Systems”, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 19(10), 2189-2205.
  75. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (2010), Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı Stratejik Planı (2010-2014),, 02.03.2023.
  76. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (2014), Türkiye Ulusal Yenilenebilir Enerji Eylem Planı (Aralık 2014),, 02.03.2023.
  77. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (2019), Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı 2019-2023 Stratejik Planı,, 02.03.2023.
  78. OWID Our World in Data (N/A),, 18.03.2021.
  79. OWID Our World in Data (N/A),, 11.10.2024.
  80. TÜİK (2020), Hanehalkı Bütçe İstatistikleri Mikro Veri Seti,, 02.03.2023.