KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order

H. Tarık Oğuzlu
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2019-12-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Rather than arguing that there is a direct causation between the independent variable of systemic factors and the dependent variable of Turkey’s foreign policy performance, this article understands the external environment as a ‘context’ in which Turkish decision makers have responded to Turkey’s responses to foreign policy issues.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article argues that there is a close relationship between the structure of the international system/order and how states define their foreign policy interests and then act accordingly.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The main contention is that Turkey’s foreign policy performance since 2002 can be partially read as Turkey’s effort to adapt to external developments at international and regional levels.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Rather than arguing that there is a direct causation between the independent variable of systemic factors and the dependent variable of Turkey’s foreign policy performance, this article understands the external environment as a ‘context’ in which Turkish decision makers have responded to Turkey’s responses to foreign policy issues.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Turkish foreign policy · international system · liberal international order

Abstract

This article argues that there is a close relationship between the structure of the international system/order and how states define their foreign policy interests and then act accordingly. The main contention is that Turkey’s foreign policy performance since 2002 can be partially read as Turkey’s effort to adapt to external developments at international and regional levels. As the international system has evolved from a unipolar order (in which the United States, in cooperation with its European allies, provided the main public goods in an hegemonic fashion), into a post-unipolar era, Turkey has accelerated its efforts to pursue a more multi-dimensional and multi-directional foreign approach. Rather than arguing that there is a direct causation between the independent variable of systemic factors and the dependent variable of Turkey’s foreign policy performance, this article understands the external environment as a ‘context’ in which Turkish decision makers have responded to Turkey’s responses to foreign policy issues.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Oğuzlu, H. T. (2019). Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.464076

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (21)

  1. Acharya, Amitav. “The Future of Global Governance: Fragmentation May Be Inevitable and Creative.” Global Governance 22 (2016): 453–60.
  2. Aras, Bülent, and Rabia Karakaya Polat. “From Conflict to Cooperation: Desecuritization of Turkey's Relations with Syria and Iran.” Security Dialogue 39, no. 5 (2008): 495–515.
  3. Başer, Ekrem T. “Shift-of-axis in Turkish Foreign Policy: Turkish National Role Conceptions Before and During AKP Rule.” Turkish Studies 16, no. 3 (2015): 291-309.
  4. Boyle, Michael J. “The Coming Illiberal Order.” Survival 58, no. 2 (2016): 35–66.
  5. Duncombe, Constance, and Tim Dunne. “After Liberal World Order.” International Affairs 94, no. 1 (2018): 25–42.
  6. Feng, Liu. “China’s Security Strategy towards East Asia.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9, no. 2 (2016): 151–79.
  7. Gardner, David. “Turkey’s Foreign Policy of ‘Precious Loneliness.” Financial Times, November 16, 2015. https://www.ft.com/content/69662b36-7752-11e5-a95a-27d368e1ddf7.
  8. Godement, François. “Expanded Ambitions, Shrinking Achievements: How China sees the global order.” Policy Brief, March 2017, European Council on Foreign Relations, London, UK. http://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/expanded_ambitions_shrinking_achievements_how_china_sees_the_global_order.
  9. Han, Ahmet K., and Behlül Özkan. “Turkey and United States in Syria: Allies, Frenemies, or Worse?” On Turkey series, September 15, 2017, German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington DC. http://www.gmfus.org/publications/turkey-and-united-states-syria-allies-frenemies-or-worse.
  10. Ikenberry, G. John. “The Plot Against American Foreign Policy Can the Liberal Order Survive?” Foreign Affairs 96 (May/June 2017): 2-9.
  11. Krieg, Andreas. “Externalizing the Burden Of War: The Obama Doctrine and US foreign policy in the Middle East.” International Affairs 92, no. 1 (2016): 97–113.
  12. Lobell, Steven E., Norin M. Ripsman, and Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, eds. Neoclasical Realism, the State and, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  13. Lukin, Alexander. “Russia in a Post-Bipolar World.” Survival 58, no. 1 (2016): 91–112.
  14. Oguzlu, Tarik. “Turkey and the European Union: Europeanization without membership.” Turkish Studies 13, no.2 (2012): 229–43.
  15. . “Turkey and Europeanization of Foreign Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 125, no. 4 (2010-2011): 657–83.
  16. Oguzlu, Tarik, and Emel Parlar Dal. “Decoding Turkey’s Rise: An Introduction.” Turkish Studies 14, no. 4 (2013): 617–36.
  17. Oguzlu, Tarik, and Mustafa Kibaroglu. “Turkey and the US in the 21st Century: Friends or Foes?” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 20, no. 4 (2008): 357–72.
  18. Onis, Ziya. “Turkey and the Arab Spring: Between Ethics and Self-Interest.” Insight Turkey 14, no. 3 (2012): 1-19.
  19. Öniş, Ziya, and Şuhnaz Yılmaz. “Turkey and Russia in a Shifting Global Order: Cooperation, conflict and asymmetric interdependence in a turbulent region.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 1 (2016): 71-95.
  20. Posen, Barry R. “The Rise of Illiberal Hegemony.” Foreign Affairs, February 2018. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-02-13/rise-illiberal-hegemony.
  21. Wilkins, Thomas S. “‘Alignment’, not ‘alliance’ – the shifting paradigm of international security cooperation: Toward a conceptual taxonomy of alignment.” Review of International Studies 38, no. 1 (2012): 53–76.