KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey

Cem Savaş(YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8620-6514
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-01-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on a qualitative case study, it eventually aims to improve the methodological character of geopolitics teaching, indirectly influencing the level and quality of geopolitics in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to present a critical portrayal of teaching geopolitics at Turkish universities by assessing both undergraduate and graduate levels of Political Science and International Relations (IR) curricula.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Geopolitical analysis has gone through several phases and traditions by conceiving space as a crucial element for representing world politics.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on a qualitative case study, it eventually aims to improve the methodological character of geopolitics teaching, indirectly influencing the level and quality of geopolitics in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Geopolitics · Political Science and International Relations (IR) Curricula · Teaching

Abstract

This study aims to present a critical portrayal of teaching geopolitics at Turkish universities by assessing both undergraduate and graduate levels of Political Science and International Relations (IR) curricula. Geopolitical analysis has gone through several phases and traditions by conceiving space as a crucial element for representing world politics. In addition to interstate rivalries, geopolitics also refers to many conflicts and rivalries within an intrastate framework in the context of multiple territorial scales. While geopolitics seems to be falsely perceived as something equal to a state-centric and hard realist academic subfield under a strong military tutelage in Turkey, it lacks a broad multi-level analysis, as well as geographical and historical reasoning. In this study, I propose to consider cartography, territoriality, and geopolitical representations, which form the basis of contemporary geopolitical analysis. The article evaluates weekly schedules, learning outcomes, content, and objectives of the courses available on the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) information packages on university websites. Based on a qualitative case study, it eventually aims to improve the methodological character of geopolitics teaching, indirectly influencing the level and quality of geopolitics in Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Savaş, C. (2024). Disciplinary Boundaries and Methodological Issues of Teaching Geopolitics in Turkey. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1413453

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (35)

  1. Boniface, Pascal. La Géopolitique [Geopolitics]. Paris: Eyrolles, 2017.
  2. Claval, Paul. “Hérodote and the French Left.” In Geopolitical Traditions. A century of geopolitical thought, edited by Klaus Dodds and David Atkinson, 239-267. New York: Routledge, 2000.
  3. Cohen, Saul B. Geopolitics, The Geography of International Relations. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.
  4. Defay, Alexandre. Jeopolitik [Geopolitics]. Ankara: Dost Yayınevi, 2005.
  5. Desforges, Alix, Barbara Loyer, Jérémie Rocques, Joséphine Boucher, Julie Mathelin and Pierre Verluise. “Existe-t-il une méthode géopolitique?” [Is there a geopolitical method?]. Diploweb.com: la revue géopolitique (2019, 19 October). Accessed March 30, 2022, https://www.diploweb.com/Video-B-Loyer-Existe-t-il-une-methode-geopolitique.html
  6. Deslauriers, Jean-Pierre, Recherche qualitative. Guide pratique [Qualitative research. Practical Guide]. Montréal: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
  7. Dodds, Klaus and David Atkinson. Preface to Geopolitical Traditions. A century of geopolitical thought, edited by Klaus Dodds and David Atkinson, xiv-xvi. New York: Routledge, 2000.
  8. Dodds, Klaus. Geopolitics. A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  9. Encel, Frédéric. Comprendre la géopolitique [Understanding geopolitics]. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 2011.
  10. Flint, Colin. Introduction to Geopolitics. London: Routledge, 2006.
  11. Foucher, Michel. Fronts et frontières. Un tour du monde géopolitique [Fronts and borders. A geopolitical world tour]. Paris: Fayard, 1991.
  12. Foucher, Michel. L’Obsession des frontières [Obsession with borders]. Paris: Perrin, 2012.
  13. Foucher, Michel. Le Retour des Frontières [The Return of Borders]. Paris: CNRS Editions, 2020.
  14. Giblin, Béatrice. “Editorial.” Hérodote, 3 130 (2008): 3-16.
  15. Giblin, Béatrice. “La géopolitique: un raisonnement géographique d’avant-garde.” [Geopolitics: avant-garde geographical reasoning]. Hérodote 146-147 (2012): 3-13.
  16. Giblin, Béatrice. “Géopolitique interne et analyse électorale.” [Internal geopolitics and electoral analysis]. Hérodote 146-147 (2012): 71-89.
  17. Gray, Colin S. “Inescapable geography.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 22: 2-3 (1999): 161-177.
  18. Kristof, Ladis K. D. “The Nature of Frontiers and Boundaries.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 49 3 (1959): 269-282.
  19. Lacoste, Yves. La géographie, ça sert, d’abord, à faire la guerre [Geography is used, first of all, to wage war]. Paris: La Découverte, (2012) [1976].
  20. Lacoste, Yves. Dictionnaire de Géopolitique [Dictionary of Geopolitics]. Paris: Flammarion, 1993.
  21. Lacoste, Yves. Géopolitique. La longue histoire d’aujourd’hui [Geopolitics. Today’s long story]. Paris: Larousse, 2009.
  22. Lacoste, Yves. Géopolitique de la Méditerranée [Geopolitics of the Mediterranean]. Paris: Armand Colin, 2009.
  23. Loubet Del Bayle, Jean-Louis, Introduction aux méthodes en sciences sociales [Introduction to social science methods]. Toulouse: Privat, 1986.
  24. Loyer, Barbara. “Retour sur les publications de l'équipe d'Hérodote et l'analyse des problèmes géopolitiques en France, une ambition citoyenne.” [Return to the publications of Hérodote’s team and the analysis of geopolitical problems in France, a civic ambition]. Hérodote 4 135 (2009): 198-204.
  25. Loyer, Barbara. Géopolitique. Méthodes et Concepts [Geopolitics. Methods and Concepts]. Paris: Armand Colin, 2019.
  26. Mace, Gordon and Petry, François, Guide d’élaboration d’un projet de recherche [Guide to developing a research project]. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2000.
  27. Mamadouh, V. D. “Geopolitics in the nineties: one flag, many meanings.” GeoJournal 46, 4 (1998): 237-253.
  28. Manheim, Jarol B. and Richard C. Rich, Empirical Political Analysis, Research Methods in Political Science, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981.
  29. Menard, Estelle, Léa Gobin and Selma Mihoubi. “Entretien avec Yves Lacoste: Qu’est-ce que la géopolitique?” [Interview with Yves Lacoste: What is geopolitics?]. Diploweb.com: la revue géopolitique, (2018, October 4). Accessed March 20, 2022, https://www.diploweb.com/Entretien-avec-Yves-Lacoste-Qu-est-ce-que-la-geopolitique.html
  30. Montbrial, Thierry de. Géographie politique [Political geography]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2006.
  31. Murphy, Alexander B., Mark Bassin, David Newman, Paul Reuber and John Agnew. “Is there a politics to geopolitics?” Progress in Human Geography 28 5 (2004): 619-640.
  32. Østerud, Øyvind. “The Uses and Abuses of Geopolitics.” Journal of Peace Research 25 2 (1988): 191-199.
  33. Rosière, Stéphane. “Géographie politique, géopolitique et géostratégie: distinctions opératoires.” [Political geography, geopolitics and geostrategy: operational distinctions]. L'information géographique 65 1 (2001): 33-42.
  34. Subra, Philippe. “La géopolitique, une ou plurielle? Place, enjeux et outils d'une géopolitique locale.” [Geopolitics, one or plural? Place, issues and tools of local geopolitics]. Hérodote 146-147 (2012): 45-70.
  35. Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1989.