KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2025 / Volume: 14 Issue: 2

Revisiting Securitization Theory within the context of North Korea: A theoretical analysis of the success of Trump’s policy

Tayyar Arı(ULUDAG UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3874-3622
Özge Gökçen Çetindişli0000-0002-3778-0093
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-07-02
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Subsequently, it discusses the efficacy of the securitization discourse in terms of the two principal parameters proposed by the Copenhagen School: audience acceptance of the threat narrative contained in the securitizing moves, and the adoption of extraordinary measures.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This empirical study, grounded in securitization theory, questions whether the security utterances of former U.S.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:President Donald Trump on North Korea between January 20, 2017, and June 12, 2018, constituted only a securitizing move or evolved into a successful securitization practice.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Subsequently, it discusses the efficacy of the securitization discourse in terms of the two principal parameters proposed by the Copenhagen School: audience acceptance of the threat narrative contained in the securitizing moves, and the adoption of extraordinary measures.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Donald Trump · securitization · North Korea

Abstract

This empirical study, grounded in securitization theory, questions whether the security utterances of former U.S. President Donald Trump on North Korea between January 20, 2017, and June 12, 2018, constituted only a securitizing move or evolved into a successful securitization practice. The research employs a hybrid methodology, combining discourse and content analyses supported by quantitative data. The focus is on analyzing the discourse within a corpus of 44 securitization statements made by the president. These statements were discerned through a comprehensive review of all the president's public remarks throughout the designated period, using queries such as “North Korea,” “Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK),” “Kim Jong Un,” etc. Employing discourse analysis, the study reveals the referent objects and securitization arguments in these statements. The data gleaned from these statements is subsequently analyzed utilizing content analysis methodology. This study also evaluates the securitization discourse by examining its compliance with the facilitating conditions of an effective securitization rhetoric, a capable securitizer, and an audience-acceptable threat selection. Subsequently, it discusses the efficacy of the securitization discourse in terms of the two principal parameters proposed by the Copenhagen School: audience acceptance of the threat narrative contained in the securitizing moves, and the adoption of extraordinary measures.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Arı, T., Çetindişli, Ö. G. (2025). Revisiting Securitization Theory within the context of North Korea: A theoretical analysis of the success of Trump’s policy. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Volume: 14 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1564598

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (89)

  1. Akgül-Açıkmeşe, Sinem. “Algı mı, Söylem mi? Kopenhag Okulu ve Yeni Klasik Gerçekçilikte Güvenlik Tehditleri.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 8, no 30 (2011): 43-73.
  2. Akgül-Açıkmeşe, Sinem. “EU Conditionality and Desecuritization nexus in Turkey.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 13, no 3 (2013): 303-323.
  3. Arı, Tayyar, ed. Critical Theories in International Relations: Identity and Security Dilemma. London: Lexington Books, 2023.
  4. Arı, Tayyar. Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri. Bursa: Aktüel, 2021.
  5. Arias, Sabrina B. “Who Securitizes? Climate Change Discourse in the United Nations.” International Studies Quarterly 66, no 2 (2022):1-52.
  6. Aydınlı Ersel, ed. Uluslararası İlişkilerde Metodoloji. İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2022.
  7. Balzacq, Thierry. “A Theory of Securitization: Origins, Core Assumptions, and Variants.” In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by Thierry Balzacq, 1–30. London: Routledge, 2011.
  8. Balzacq, Thierry. “Securitization Theory: Past, Present, and Future.” Polity 51, no 2 (2019): 331–348.
  9. Balzacq, Thierry. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience, and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11, no 2 (2005): 171-201.
  10. Baysal, Başar. “20 Years of Securitization: Strengths, Limitations and A New Dual Framework.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 17, no 67 (2020): 3-20.
  11. Bendix, Aria. “U.S. to Ban Citizens from Traveling to North Korea.” CNN. July 7, 2021. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/07/us-to-prohibit-citizens-from-traveling-to-north-korea/534549/.
  12. Bilgin, Pınar. “The Politics of Studying Securitization? The Copenhagen School in Turkey.” Security Dialogue, 42 (2011): 399-412.
  13. Bourbeau, Philippe. The Securitization of Migration: A Study of Movement and Order. London: Routledge, 2011.
  14. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. “Macrosecuritization and Security Constellations: Reconsidering Scale in Securitization Theory.” Review of International Studies 35 no 2, (2009): 253-276.
  15. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. Regions and Power: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  16. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.
  17. “CNN Pool (03 August-06 August 2017).” CNN. 2017. Accessed date April 30, 2021. http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2017/images/08/08/rel7b.-.north.korea.pdf.
  18. Collins, Lisa. “25 Years of Negotiations and Provocations: North Korea and the U.S.” Beyond the Parallel. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://beyondparallel.csis.org/25-years-of-negotiations-provocations/.
  19. “Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to North Korea.” White House Archives. June 21, 2017. Accessed date May 22, 2021. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/continuation-national-emergency-respect-north-korea/.
  20. Côté, Adam. “Social Securitization Theory.” PhD diss. University of Calgary, 2015.
  21. “Country Reports on Terrorism 2017.” U.S. Department of State. 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2017/.
  22. “Database: North Korean Provocation.” Beyond the Parallel. December 20, 201. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://beyondparallel.csis.org/database-north-korean-provocations/.
  23. Dian, Matteo. “Trump’s Mixed Signals toward North Korea and US-led Alliances in East Asia.” The International Spectator 53, no 4 (2018): 112-128.
  24. Donald Trump.” American Presidency Project. Accessed date September 14, 2024. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/people/president/donald-j-trump.
  25. Erskine, Toni. “Existential Threats, Shared Responsibility, and Australia’s Role in Coalitions of the Obligated.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 76, no 2 (2022): 130-137.
  26. Fifield, Anna. “Kim Jong Un calls Trump a ‘mentally deranged U.S. dotard.’” The Washington Post. September 21, 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/09/21/north-korean-leader-to-trump-i-will-surely-and-definitely-tame-the-mentally-deranged-u-s-dotard-with-fire/.
  27. Floyd, Rita, and Stuart Croft. “European Non-Traditional Security Theory: From Theory to Practice.” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 3, no 2 (2011): 152–179.
  28. Floyd, Rita. “Securitization and the Function of Functional Actors.” Critical Studies on Security 9, no 2 (2021): 81-79.
  29. Floyd, Rita. “Securitization theories: Big Picture Theorising vs. 1:1 Mapping.” Paper presented at ISA Annual Convention, Montréal: (Slot Code: SC32) Innovations in Securitization Studies, 2023.
  30. Garamone, Jim. “Trump Warns North Korean Leader Not to Underestimate U.S.-South Korean Will.” U.S. Department of Defense. November 7, 2017. Accessed date December 24, 2022. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/1365790/trump-warns-north-korean-leader-not-to-underestimate-us-south-korean-will/.
  31. “Guam residents shaken by ‘scary’ threats from North Korea.” USA Today. August 8, 2018. Accessed date January 23, 2022. https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/world/2017/08/09/guam-residents-shaken-scary-threats-north-korea/104423744/.
  32. Hagström, Linus, and Magnus Lundström. “Overcoming US-North Korean Enmity: Lessons from an Eclectic IR Approach.” The International Spectator 54, no. 4 (2019): 94-108.
  33. Hanrieder, Tine, and Christian Kreuder-Sonnen. “WHO Decides on the Exception? Securitization and Emergency Governance in Global Health.” Security Dialogue 45, no 4 (2014): 301-348.
  34. Harrison, Bruce. “Kim Jong Un Highlights His ‘Nuclear Button,’ Offers Olympic Talks.” NBC News. January 2, 2018. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/north-korea/kim-says-north-korea-s-nuclear-weapons-will-prevent-war-n833781.
  35. Hayes, Christal. “Trump blasts media as America’s ‘biggest enemy’ for North Korea coverage.” USA Today. June 13, 2008. Accessed date January 25, 2022. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/06/13/donald-trump-blasts-media-americas-biggest-enemy-north-korea-coverage/697532002/.
  36. Herskovitz, Jon. “These Are the Nuclear Weapons North Korea Has as Fears Mount of Atomic Test.” Bloomberg. December 3, 2022. Accessed date December 24, 2022. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-03/how-kim-jong-un-keeps-advancing-his-nuclear-program-quicktake.
  37. Howell, Alison, and Melenie Richter-Montpetit. “Is Securitization Theory Racist? Civilizationism, Methodological Whiteness, and Anti-black Thought in the Copenhagen School.” Security Dialogue 51, no 1 (2020): 3-22.
  38. Jang, Se Young. “Do South Koreans Really Want U.S. Tactical Nukes Back on the Korean Peninsula?” National Interest. September 19, 2017. Accessed date February 8, 2021. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/do-south-koreans-really-want-us-tactical-nukes-back-the-22379.
  39. Jong Un, Kim. “Kim Jong Un’s 2017 New Year's Address.” The National Committee on North Korea. January 2, 2017. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://www.ncnk.org/sites/default/files/KJU_2017_New_Years_Address.pdf.
  40. Kaunert, Christian, Sarah Leonard and Ori Wertman. “Securitization of COVID-19 as a Security Norm: WHO Norm Entrepreneurship and Norm Cascading.” Social Sciences 11, no 7 (2022): 1-19.
  41. Kim, Sung-han, and Snyder Scott. “Denuclearizing North Korea: Time for Plan B.” The Washington Quarterly 42, no. 4 (2019): 75-90.
  42. Kirk, Jessica, and Matt McDonald. “The Politics of Exceptionalism: Securitization and COVID-19.” Global Studies Quarterly 1, no 3 (2021):1-12.
  43. “Leaders Brief Congress on Review of North Korea Policy.” U.S. Department of Defense, April 26, 2017. Accessed date May 21, 2021. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/1164057/leaders-brief-congress-on-review-of-north-korea-policy/.
  44. McInnis, Kathleen J. “The North Korean Nuclear Challenge: Military Options and Issues for Congress.” CRS Report R44994. November 6, 2017. Accessed date October 8, 2021. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/nuke/R44994.pdf.
  45. “North Korea: Events of 2018.” World Report. 2019. Accessed date May 4, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/country-chapters/north-korea.
  46. “Nuclear Negotiations with North Korea.” CRS Report: R45033. May 4, 2021. Accessed date April 2, 2022. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45033.
  47. O’Reilly, Ciaran. “Primetime Patriotism: News Media and the Securitization of Iraq.” Journal of Politics and Law 1, no 3 (2008): 66-72.
  48. Obama, Barack. National Security Strategy. Washington, DC: White House, 2015. Accessed date April 30, 2021. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf.
  49. Pouster, Jacob. “Americans hold very negative views of North Korea amid nuclear tensions.” PEW Research. April 5, 2017. Accessed date August 26, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/04/05/americans-hold-very-negative-views-of-north-korea-amid-nuclear-tensions/.
  50. “Remarks by President Trump and President Moon of the Republic of Korea in Joint Press Conference | Seoul, Republic of Korea.” White House Archives. November 7, 2017. Accessed date October 26, 2022. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-president-moon-republic-korea-joint-press-conference-seoul-republic-korea/.
  51. “Remarks by President Trump and President Rajoy of the Government of Spain.” White House Archives. September 26, 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-president-rajoy-government-spain-joint-press-conference/.
  52. “Remarks by President Trump at a Working Lunch with U.N. Security Council Ambassadors.” White House Archives. May 24, 2017. Accessed date May 23, 2021. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-working-lunch-u-n-security-council-ambassadors/.
  53. “Remarks by President Trump Before Cabinet Meeting.” White House Archives. November 20, 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-cabinet-meeting-2/.
  54. “Remarks by President Trump in State of the Union Address.” White House Archives. January 30, 2018. Accessed date October 26, 2022. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-state-union-address/.
  55. “Remarks by President Trump on His Trip to Asia.” White House Archives. November 15, 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-trip-asia/.
  56. “Remarks by President Trump to the 72nd Session of the United Nations General Assembly.” White House Archives. September 19, 2017. Accessed date January 23, 2022. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefstrfings-statements/remarks-president-trump-72nd-session-united-nations-general-assembly/.
  57. “Remarks by President Trump to the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea.” White House Archives. December 11, 2017. Accessed date May 23, 2021. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-national-assembly-republic-korea-seoul-republic-korea/.
  58. “Remarks by President Trump, President Moon, and Prime Minister Abe.” White House Archives. September 21, 2017. Accessed date May 21, 2021. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-president-moon-republic-korea-prime-minister-abe-japan-trilateral-meeting/.
  59. “Resolutions.” United Nations Security Council. Accessed date July 25, 2021. https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/resolutions.
  60. Ripsman, Norrin M., Jeffrey Taliaferro and Steven E. Lobell. “Neoclassical Realist Intervening Variables.” In Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics, edited by Norrin M. Ripsman, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro and Steven A. Lobell, 58-79. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2016.
  61. “Roll Call Votes.” Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representative. 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022. https://clerk.house.gov/Votes?BillNum=H.R479&CongressNum=115&Session=1st.
  62. Saad, Lydia. “More Back U.S. Military Action vs. North Korea Than in 2003.” Gallup. 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022. https://news.gallup.com/poll/219134/back-military-action-north-korea-2003.aspx.
  63. Salter, Mark. “When Securitization Fails: The Hard Case of Counter-terrorism Programs.” In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by Thierry Balzacq 116-132. London: Routledge, 2010.
  64. Sang-Hun, Chow. “U.S. Antimissile System Goes Live in South Korea.” The New York Times. May 2, 2017. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/02/world/asia/thaad-north-korea-missile-defense-us.html?_r=0.
  65. Schotthöfer, Alexander. “Individuals in Securitization: Explaining US Presidents’ Choice to (De)Securitize North Korea.” Foreign Policy Analysis 20, no 3 (2024): 1-21.
  66. Schwarz, Tim. “North Korea issues warning as US strike group heads to Korean Peninsula.” May 13, 2017. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/10/politics/us-aircraft-carrier-carl-vinson-north-korea-strike-capabilities/index.html.
  67. Secen, Sefa. “Explaining the Politics of Security: Syrian Refugees in Turkey and Lebanon.” Journal of Global Security Studies 6, no 3 (2021): 1-21.
  68. Smith, Hazel. “Bad, Mad, Sad or Rational Actor? Why the ‘Securitization’ Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea.” International Affairs 76, no 3 (2000): 593-617.
  69. “South Korea to bring back US tactical nuclear missiles?” DW. September 6, 2017. Accessed date February 8, 2021. https://www.dw.com/en/south-korea-to-bring-back-us-tactical-nuclear-missiles/a-40377902.
  70. “State Sponsors of Terrorism.” U.S. Department of State. 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022, https://www.state.gov/state-sponsors-of-terrorism/.
  71. Tagliaietra, Alberto. “Media and Securitization: The Influence on Perception.” IAI Papers 21, no 34 (2021): 1-17.
  72. “THAAD Fact Sheet.” United State Forces Korea. September 7, 2017. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://www.usfk.mil/Media/Press-Products/Press-Releases/Article/1301280/thaad-fact-sheet/
  73. “The Trump Twitter Archive.” Trump Twitter Archive V2. June 12, 2018. Accessed date March 28, 2021. https://www.thetrumparchive.com.
  74. “Top 10 U.S. Newspapers by Circulation.” Agilty PR. July 2022. Accessed date December 23, 2023, https://www.agilitypr.com/resources/top-media-outlets/top-10-daily-american-newspapers/.
  75. “Trump Administration Announces New Travel Restrictions.” ProCon.org. September 26, 2017. Accessed date April 3, 2021. https://www.procon.org/trump-administration-announces-new-travel-restrictions/.
  76. “Trump Claims Has ‘Largely Solved’ North Korean Nuclear Crisis.” RFL/RL. June 15, 2018. Accessed date March 18, 2021. https://www.rferl.org/a/us-trump-claims-has-largely-solved-north-korean-nuclear-crisis/29292309.html.
  77. “Trump declares ‘patience is over’ with North Korea.” The Guardian. June 1, 2017. Accessed date July 5, 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/01/donald-trump-declares-patience-is-over-with-north-korea.
  78. “Trump warns N Korea that US military is ‘locked and loaded.’” BBC. August 11, 2017. Accessed date October 8, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40901746.
  79. “Trump Warns North Korean Leader Not to Underestimate U.S.-South Korean Will.” U.S. Department of Defense. November 7, 2017. Accessed date May 23, 2021. https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/1365790/trump-warns-north-korean-leader-not-to-underestimate-us-south-korean-will/.
  80. Trump, Donald. National Security Strategy. Washington, DC: White House 2017. Accessed date June 28, 2021. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf.
  81. U.S. Congress. “H.R.479.” Congressional Bills, 115th Congress. January 12, 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-115hr479ih/html/BILLS-115hr479ih.htm.
  82. United Nations Security Council. “Resolution 2356 (2017) Resolution 2371 (2017), Resolution 2375 (2017), Resolution 2397 (2017).” United Nations Digital Library. 2017. Accessed date February 12, 2022. https://digitallibrary.un.org/?ln=en.
  83. “US-North Korea summit ‘an important milestone’ towards denuclearization, says Guterres.” Soualiga Newsday. June 12, 2018. Accessed date December 14, 2021. https://www.soualiganewsday.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=20154:us-north-korea-summit-%E2%80%98an-important-milestone%E2%80%99-towards-denuclearization,-says-guterres&Itemid=519.
  84. Wæver, Ole, and Barry Buzan. “Racism and Responsibility – The Critical Limits of Deepfake Methodology in Security Studies: A Reply to Howell and Richter Montpetit.” Security Dialogue l, no 51(4) (2020): 386-394.
  85. Wæver, Ole. “Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy: Discourse Analysis as a Foreign Policy Theory.” In European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic State, edited by Lene Hansen and Ole Wæver, 20-49. London: Routledge, 2002.
  86. Wæver, Ole. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In On Security, edited by Ronnie Lipschutz, 48-86. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.
  87. Wæver, Ole. “The EU as a Security Actor – Reflections from a Pessimistic Constructivist on Post-sovereign Security Orders.” In International Relations Theory & European Integration: Power, Security, and Community, edited by Morten Kelstrup and Michael Williams, 250-294. London: Routledge, 2000.
  88. Wilkinson, Claire. “The Copenhagen School on Tour in Kyrgyzstan: Is Securitization Theory Useable Outside Europe.” Security Dialogue 38, no 1 (2007): 5-25.
  89. Williams, Michael C. “The Continuing Evolution of Securitization Theory.” In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by Thierry Balzacq, 226-236. London: Routledge, 2011.