KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Doktora Öğrencilerinin Yapay Zeka Kullanımı Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma

A Qualitative Study on Doctoral Students’ Use of Artificial Intelligence

Emine Aruğaslan(Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi, Uzaktan Eğitim Meslek Yüksekokulu)0000-0002-8153-9117
Sayfa
36–53
Yayın Tarihi
2025-03-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Veriler içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiş ve sonuç olarak 6 kategori ve 26 tema oluşturulmuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Yapay zekâ, eğitim sektöründe giderek daha yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmakta ve öğretme-öğrenme süreçlerinde köklü değişiklikler yaratmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırma, nitel araştırma deseniyle gerçekleştirilmiş, uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen 12 doktora öğrencisi de araştırmanın katılımcıları olarak belirlenmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Veriler içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiş ve sonuç olarak 6 kategori ve 26 tema oluşturulmuştur.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:yapay zeka araçları · doktora öğrencileri · kullanıcı deneyimleri

Özet

Yapay zekâ, eğitim sektöründe giderek daha yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmakta ve öğretme-öğrenme süreçlerinde köklü değişiklikler yaratmaktadır. Bu durum, yapay zekâ araçlarının hem eğitimdeki potansiyel avantajlarını hem de olası sakıncalarını inceleme ihtiyacını ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Bu çalışma, doktora öğrencilerinin yapay zekâ araçlarını eğitimde nasıl kullandıklarını, bu araçlara yönelik deneyim ve görüşlerini derinlemesine ele almak amacıyla tasarlanmıştır. Araştırma, nitel araştırma deseniyle gerçekleştirilmiş, uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen 12 doktora öğrencisi de araştırmanın katılımcıları olarak belirlenmiştir. Veriler içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiş ve sonuç olarak 6 kategori ve 26 tema oluşturulmuştur. Bu kategoriler yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik olarak, “tercih nedenler,” “genel avantajlar,” “eğitimdeki avantajlar,” “eğitimde kullanımına yönelik sakıncalar,” “karşılaşılan zorluklar” ve “kişisel-mesleki gelişime katkılar” şeklinde belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, yapay zekâ araçlarının kolay erişilebilirlik, pratiklik ve hız gibi nedenlerle tercih edildiğini, ancak bilgi güvenilirliği, etik sorunlar ve intihal gibi sakıncalarının da bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Bu kapsamda, yapay zekânın eğitimdeki rolü ve etkisi öğrencilerin gözünden değerlendirilmiş ve bu teknolojinin öğrenme süreçlerine getirdiği fırsatlar ve riskler detaylı bir şekilde ortaya konulmuştur.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being integrated into the education sector, bringing about significant changes in teaching and learning processes. This growing influence underscores the need for a thorough investigation into the effective use, potential benefits, and possible challenges associated with Artificial intelligence tools in education. This study aimed to explore doctoral students’ experiences and perspectives on the use of Artificial intelligence tools in education. Adopting a qualitative research design, the study included 12 doctoral students selected through a purposive sampling method. Data were analyzed using content analysis, resulting in the identification of 6 main categories and 26 themes. These categories included “reasons for preference,” “general advantages,” “advantages in education,” “challenges in educational use,” “difficulties encountered,” and “contributions to personal and professional development.” The findings revealed that Artificial intelligence tools are primarily preferred for their accessibility, practicality, and speed, but concerns about information reliability, ethical issues, and plagiarism also emerged. This study provides a comprehensive insight into the role and impact of artificial intelligence in education from the perspective of students, highlighting the opportunities and risks it presents in learning processes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aruğaslan, E. (2025). Doktora Öğrencilerinin Yapay Zeka Kullanımı Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1557111

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (51)

  1. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
  2. Alawida, M., Mejri, S., Mehmood, A., Chikhaoui, B., & Isaac Abiodun, O. (2023). A comprehensive study of ChatGPT: advancements, limitations, and ethical considerations in natural language processing and cybersecurity. Information, 14(8), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080462
  3. Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research. Research in Science Education, 54(5), 977-997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3
  4. AL-Sa’di A., & Miller, D. (2023). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence language model ChatGPT on the user experience. International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management, 3(1), 1-8. Erişim adresi: https://www.journals.gaftim.com/index.php/ijtim/article/view/195/108
  5. Anwar, A., Rehman, I. U., Nasralla, M. M., Khattak, S. B. A., & Khilji, N. (2023). Emotions matter: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the detection and classification of students’ emotions in stem during online learning. Education Sciences, 13(9), 914. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090914
  6. Bansal, G., Chamola, V., Hussain, A., Guizani, M., & Niyato, D. (2024). Transforming conversations with AI—a comprehensive study of ChatGPT. Cognitive Computation, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10236-2
  7. Barrot, J. S. (2024a). Google bard as an automated written corrective feedback tool: Possibilities and drawbacks. TESOL Journal, e805, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.805
  8. Barrot, J. S. (2024b). Leveraging Google Gemini as a Research Writing Tool in Higher Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09774-x
  9. Bezzina, S., & Dingli, A. (2023, July). Rethinking gamification through artificial intelligence. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction içinde (s. 252-263). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  10. Bilad, M. R., Yaqin, L. N., & Zubaidah, S. (2023). Recent progress in the use of artificial intelligence tools in education. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, 7(3), 279-314. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v7i3.1377
  11. Bozkurt, A. (2023). ChatGPT, Üretken Yapay Zeka ve Algoritmik Paradigma Değişikliği. Alanyazın (CRES Journal), 4(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.59320/alanyazin.1283282
  12. Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note 2021. AI and Ethics, 2(1), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z
  13. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  14. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
  15. Çınar Yağcı, Ş., & Aydın Yıldız, T. (2023). ChatGPT, yabancı dil öğrencisinin güvenilir yapay zekâ sohbet arkadaşı mıdır?. RumeliDE Dil Ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2023(37), 1315-1333. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1407539
  16. Çivril, H. (2023). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında uyarlanabilir oyunlaştırma. H. Erol (Ed.), Eğitim bilimleri alanında uluslararası araştırmalar XVII içinde, (s. 29-45). İstanbul: Eğitim Yayınevi.
  17. Dogan, M. E., Goru Dogan, T., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in online learning and distance education processes: A systematic review of empirical studies. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3056. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053056
  18. Edwards-Fapohunda, M. O., & Adediji, M. A. (2024). Sustainable development of distance learning in continuing adult education: The impact of artificial intelligence. IRE Journals, 8(1), 113-118. Erişim adresi: https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1706017.pdf
  19. Fitria, T. N. (2021, December). Artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Using AI tools for teaching and learning process. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Paper STIE AAS içinde (s. 134-147). Erişim adresi: https://prosiding.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/prosenas/article/view/106/104
  20. Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A. T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: a literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216
  21. Gujjula, R., & Sanghera, K. (2023). Ethical considerations and data privacy in ai education. Journal of Student-Scientists’ Research, 5(2023). https://doi.org/10.13021/jssr2023.3958
  22. Halkiopoulos, C., & Gkintoni, E. (2024). Leveraging AI in E-Learning: Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment through Cognitive Neuropsychology—A Systematic Analysis. Electronics, 13(18), 3762. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183762
  23. Hashem, R., Ali, N., El Zein, F., Fidalgo, P., & Khurma, O. A. (2024). AI to the rescue: Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a teacher ally for workload relief and burnout prevention. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19023
  24. Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0077
  25. Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(100001), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  26. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S.,. & Wang, Y. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230-243. Erişim adresi: https://svn.bmj.com/content/svnbmj/2/4/230.full.pdf
  27. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business horizons, 62(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
  28. Khakpour, A., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2021). Convergence of gamification and machine learning: a systematic literature review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(3), 597-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09456-4
  29. Kok, J. N., Boers, E. J., Kosters, W. A., Van der Putten, P., & Poel, M. (2009). Artificial intelligence: definition, trends, techniques, and cases. J. N. Kok (Ed.), Artificial intelligence içinde, (s. 1-20). Oxford: Eolss Publishers. Erişim adresi: https://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C15/E6-44.pdf
  30. Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
  31. Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(2023), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
  32. Lampou, R. (2023). The integration of artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and challenges. Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4,(2023), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v4i00.15
  33. Miles, M. ve Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
  34. Neo, M., Lee, C. P., Tan, H. Y. J., Neo, T. K., Tan, Y. X., Mahendru, N., & Ismat, Z. (2022). Enhancing students’ online learning experiences with artificial intelligence (AI): The MERLIN project. International Journal of Technology, 13(5), 1023-1034. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i5.5843
  35. Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221-4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
  36. Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, (100033), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033
  37. Özkara, B. Ö. (2021). Determining the optimal duration of a single lecture in distance education using facial analysis of ınstructors. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 35-43.
  38. Pannu, A. (2015). Artificial intelligence and its application in different areas. Artificial Intelligence, 4(10), 79-84.
  39. Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893-7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
  40. Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380-1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851
  41. Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9
  42. Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2023, July). The user experience of ChatGPT: findings from a questionnaire study of early users. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on conversational user interfaces içinde (s. 1-10). https://doi.org/10.1145/3571884.3597144
  43. Tapan Broutin, M. S. (2024). Exploring Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Instrumentation Process of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Developing Lesson Plans. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 14(1), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1347061
  44. Tonguç, G., & Ozkara, B. O. (2020). Automatic recognition of student emotions from facial expressions during a lecture. Computers & Education, 148, 103797, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103797
  45. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin.
  46. Verma, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence and its scope in different areas with special reference to the field of education. International Journal of Advanced Educational Research, 3(1), 5-10. Erişim adresi: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED604401.pdf
  47. Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet?-a systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 4(2021), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924
  48. Yadegaridehkordi, E., Noor, N. F. B. M., Ayub, M. N. B., Affal, H. B., & Hussin, N. B. (2019). Affective computing in education: A systematic review and future research. Computers & Education, 142, 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103649
  49. Yim, I. H. Y., & Su, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) learning tools in K-12 education: A scoping review. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9
  50. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  51. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S.,. & Wang, Y. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230-243. Erişim adresi: https://svn.bmj.com/content/svnbmj/2/4/230.full.pdf