KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4

Ortaokul Öğrencilerine Yönelik Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Tutum Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Development and Validation of an Attitude Scale Towards Sustainable Development for Middle School Students

Zübeyde Tecimer Altınel(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ, FEN BİLGİSİ EĞİTİMİ (DR))0000-0001-7535-1866
Esra Kızılay(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, MATEMATİK VE FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-8329-0186
Mustafa Hamalosmanoğlu(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, MATEMATİK VE FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-1126-0268
Sayfa
777–799
Yayın Tarihi
2025-10-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç olarak, geliştirilen SKYTÖ, 5 dereceli Likert tipi bir ölçek olarak tasarlanmış olup, toplamda 41 maddeden oluşmaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilir kalkınma eğitimi çerçevesinde ortaokul öğrencilerinin sürdürülebilir kalkınma konusundaki tutumlarını belirleyebilmek için bilişsel, duyuşsal ve davranışsal boyutları kapsayan “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmaya Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği”ni (SKYTÖ) geliştirmektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırma, tarama modeliyle gerçekleştirilmiş olup, çalışma grubunu 2022-2023 eğitim-öğretim yılı itibarıyla Orta Anadolu Bölgesi’ndeki çeşitli ortaokullarda öğrenim gören 757 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç olarak, geliştirilen SKYTÖ, 5 dereceli Likert tipi bir ölçek olarak tasarlanmış olup, toplamda 41 maddeden oluşmaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2022-2023 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:ortaokul öğrencileri · sürdürülebilir kalkınma · tutum ölçeği.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilir kalkınma eğitimi çerçevesinde ortaokul öğrencilerinin sürdürülebilir kalkınma konusundaki tutumlarını belirleyebilmek için bilişsel, duyuşsal ve davranışsal boyutları kapsayan “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmaya Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği”ni (SKYTÖ) geliştirmektir. Araştırma, tarama modeliyle gerçekleştirilmiş olup, çalışma grubunu 2022-2023 eğitim-öğretim yılı itibarıyla Orta Anadolu Bölgesi’ndeki çeşitli ortaokullarda öğrenim gören 757 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Ölçek maddeleri, Birleşmiş Milletler’in belirlediği 17 Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amacı göz önünde bulundurularak oluşturulmuş ve uzman görüşleri doğrultusunda geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri için veriler toplanmıştır. Bu süreçte, betimsel istatistiklerin yanı sıra açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmış ve iç tutarlılık katsayısı olan Cronbach Alpha değeri hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, geliştirilen SKYTÖ, 5 dereceli Likert tipi bir ölçek olarak tasarlanmış olup, toplamda 41 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin duyuşsal boyutu 15, davranışsal boyutu 14 ve bilişsel boyutu ise 12 maddeden oluşmaktadır. SKYTÖ, öğretmenler tarafından ortaokul öğrencilerinin sürdürülebilir kalkınma tutumlarını farklı değişkenler açısından değerlendirmek amacıyla kullanılabilir.

Abstract

This study aims to develop the “Attitude Scale Towards Sustainable Development” (ASTSD), which covers the cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions, to determine middle school students' attitudes towards sustainable development within the framework of sustainable development education. The research was conducted using a survey model, and the study group consists of 757 students attending various middle schools in a city in the Central Anatolia Region during the 2022-2023 academic year. The scale items were developed considering the 17 Sustainable Development Goals set by the United Nations, and data were collected for validity and reliability analyses through expert opinions. In this process, in addition to descriptive statistics, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed, and the internal consistency coefficient, Cronbach's Alpha, was calculated. As a result, the developed ASTSD is designed as a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of a total of 41 items. The affective dimension of the scale consists of 15 items, the behavioral dimension of 14 items, and the cognitive dimension of 12 items. Teachers can use ASTSD to assess middle school students' attitudes towards sustainable development from various perspectives.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Altınel, Z. T., Kızılay, E., Hamalosmanoğlu, M. (2025). Ortaokul Öğrencilerine Yönelik Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Tutum Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4, 777–799. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1708103

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (69)

  1. Afacan, Ö., & Demirci Güler, M. P. (2011). A study on developing an attitude scale within the scope of sustainable environmental education. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 904-913.
  2. Akgül, F. A. (2020). The effect of socio-scientific issue-supported science teaching on 8th grade students’ awareness levels toward sustainable development [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
  3. Akgül, F. A., & Aydoğdu, M. (2020). Development of a scale for awareness toward sustainable living for middle school students. Trakya Journal of Education, 10(2), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.633081
  4. Aksan, Z. (2016). Education and awareness raising on waste recycling for sustainable development among pre-service science teachers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ondokuz Mayıs University.
  5. Altuntaş, C., & Türker, D. (2012). Sustainable supply chains: Content analysis of sustainability reports. Dokuz Eylul University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 14(3), 39-64.
  6. Atmaca, A. C. (2018). Determination of science teacher candidates’ awareness of sustainable development [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
  7. Aydın, Ö. (2019). Developing vocational high school students’ awareness levels toward sustainable development [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Trabzon University.
  8. Aydın, Ö., & Çimer, A. (2021). The effect of active learning-supported project-based learning method on students' attitudes toward sustainable development. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10(4), 1369-1391. https://doi.org/10.30703/CIJE.796850
  9. Aytar, A. (2016). The effect of interdisciplinary science teaching on the development of 7th-grade students regarding sustainable development [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Karadeniz Technical University Bazin, M. S. (2012). Sustainable development. Caretta Publishing.
  10. Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the Attitudes Toward Sustainable Development Scale. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 214-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660
  11. Birdsall, S. (2013). Reconstructing the relationship between science and education for sustainability: A proposed framework of learning. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8(3), 451-478. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2013.214a
  12. Boncukçu, G. (2020). The effect of problem-based learning model on secondary school 8th-grade students’ environmental literacy, problem-solving, and self-regulation skills in relation to sustainable development [Unpublished master's thesis]. Mersin University.
  13. Burkaz Ekinci, S. (2021). A module development study for sustainable development education for middle school students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University.
  14. Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2013). An understanding of sustainability and education for sustainable development among German student teachers and trainee teachers of chemistry. Science Education International, 24(2), 167-194. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20137B
  15. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation (22nd ed.). Pegem Academy.
  16. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Scientific research methods (20th ed.). Pegem. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789944919289
  17. Cebrián, G., & Junyent, M. (2015). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teachers’ views. Sustainability, 7, 2768-2786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7032768
  18. Corney, G., & Reid, A. (2007). Student teachers’ learning about subject matter and pedagogy in education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620601122632
  19. Çetin, F. A. (2015). The effect of ecological footprint education on 8th grade students’ attitudes, awareness, and behavior levels toward sustainable living [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University.
  20. Çimer, A., & Aydın, Ö. (2018). Development of a scale to assess high schoolers' attitudes toward sustainable development. International Education Studies, 11(7), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n7p116
  21. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications. Pegem Academy.
  22. Dal, Ş. (2020). Determining science teachers’ awareness and opinions about sustainable development [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University. https://doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.2021.176
  23. Demirtaş, F., & Çinici, A. (2019). Analyzing 8th grade students' ecological footprints and attitudes toward sustainable environment in terms of various variables. Kazım Karabekir Faculty of Education Journal, 38, 46-65. https://doi.org/10.33418/ataunikkefd.549459
  24. DeVellis, R.F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  25. Dursun, B. (2022). The effect of teaching the sustainable development unit in 8th grade science course through creative drama method on students’ science attitudes and social skills [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Bartın University.
  26. Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5). 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582
  27. Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development – Justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a
  28. Erkol, M. (2019). The effect of a learning environment supported by different teaching activities on the topic of sustainable development [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University.
  29. Erkuş, A. (2003). Essays on psychometrics. Publications of the Turkish Psychological Association. Foster, J. (2001). Education as sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 7(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120043162
  30. Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 874-907. https://doi.org/10.2307/258959
  31. Gürbüz, A. (2020). Determining primary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and opinions regarding education for sustainable development [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Fırat University.
  32. Hoepper, B. (1993). Seeking global citizens in the history classroom. In D. Dufty & H. Dufty (Eds.), We sing of a world reshaped: Readings and reflections on global citizenship (pp. 7–35). Social Education Association of Australia.
  33. İnceoğlu, M. (2010). Attitude, perception, communication. Beykent University Publications.
  34. Jigling, B. (1992). Why I don’t want my children to be educated for sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Education, 3, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1992.9942801
  35. Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1999). The new human and people: An introduction to social psychology (10th ed.). Evrim Publishing.
  36. Kanmaz, D. (2019). 7th and 8th grade students’ attitudes towards sustainable development and the factors related to these attitudes [Unpublished master’s thesis, Yıldız Technical University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  37. Karasar, N. (2002). Scientific research method (11th ed.). Nobel Publishing.
  38. Kaya, M. F. (2013). A study on developing an attitude scale towards sustainable development. Marmara Geographical Review, 28, 175-193. http://www.marmaracografya.com
  39. Keleş, Ö. (2007). Implementation and evaluation of ecological footprint as a tool for environmental education towards sustainable living [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
  40. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
  41. Koçulu, A. (2018). Investigation of the relationship between science teacher candidates’ awareness of sustainable development and their attitudes and behaviors towards environmental problems [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Akdeniz University.
  42. Kuvaç, M. (2018). The effectiveness of an instructional design for environmental education based on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Istanbul University.
  43. Maidou, A., Plakitsi, K., & Polatoglou, H. M. (2019). Knowledge, perceptions and attitudes on education for sustainable development of pre-service early childhood teachers in Greece. World Journal of Education, 9(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n5p1
  44. Michalos, A. C., Creech, H., McDonald, C., & Kahlke, P. M. (2012). Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning education for sustainable development: Two exploratory studies. Social Indicators Research, 108(3), 391-413.
  45. Ministry of National Education. (2013). Science course curriculum for primary education institutions (grades 6, 7, and 8). Ministry of National Education.
  46. Nikel, J. (2007). Making sense of education ‘responsibly’: Findings from a study of student teachers’ understanding(s) of education, sustainable development and Education for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research, 13(5), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430778
  47. Özsoy, A. (2021). Examination of prospective teachers' awareness of sustainable development [Master’s thesis]. Fırat University.
  48. Özsoy, R. (2019). An explanation of science teachers’ views on education for sustainable development [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
  49. Pallant, J. (2017). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (S. Balcı & B. Ahi, Trans.). Anı Publishing.
  50. Petersen, J. F., & Alkış, S. (2009). How do Turkish eighth grade students conceptualize sustainability? European Journal of Education Studies, 1(1), 67-74.
  51. Sağdıç, A. (2013). A closer look into Turkish elementary teachers regarding education for sustainable development [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
  52. Sağdıç, A., & Şahin, E. (2015). Beliefs towards education for sustainable development: A scale development study. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Faculty of Education (KEFAD), 16(3), 161-180.
  53. Scherer, R. F., Wiebe, F. A., Luther, D. C., & Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 62(3), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1988.62.3.763
  54. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610904
  55. Seçer, İ. (2017). Psychological test development and adaptation process: SPSS and LISREL applications. Anı Publishing.
  56. Shephard, K. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 87-98.
  57. Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  58. Soysal, N. (2016). Primary school teacher candidates’ perceptions of competencies towards education for sustainable development [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
  59. Şeker, S. (2018). Attitudes and behaviors of 7th-8th grade students towards sustainable development and climate change [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
  60. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon.
  61. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Nobel Publishing.
  62. Tavşancıl, E., & Keser, H. (2002). Developing a Likert-type attitude scale towards internet usage. Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 79-100.
  63. Türer, B. (2010). Determining the sustainable development awareness of science and social studies teacher candidates [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ondokuz Mayıs University.
  64. UNECE. (2005). UNECE strategy for education for sustainable development. United Nations.
  65. UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development Goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
  66. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2015). About the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
  67. Ülgen, G. (1996). Educational psychology. Lazer Offset.
  68. Walshe, N. (2008). Understanding students’ conceptions of sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 14(5), 537-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802345958
  69. Yapıcı, M. (2003). Sustainable development and education. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 223-229. http://hdl.handle.net/11630/3159