Dergiler / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2

ÇİN’İN ASKERİ YÜKSELİŞİ VE ABD-JAPONYA İTTİFAKI: DENGELEME STRATEJİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR VAKA İNCELEMESİ

CHINA’S MILITARY RISE AND THE US-JAPAN ALLIANCE: A CASE FOR THE BALANCING STRATEGY

Orhan Çifçi(Polis Akademisi Güvenlik Bilimleri Enstitüsü)0000-0002-5746-4258
Sayfa
693–716
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çalışma, Çin’den algılanan tehdide yanıt olarak ABD ve Japonya’nın bölgesel pozisyon ve güvenliğini korumak amacıyla bir ittifak kurma yöntemi olan dengeleme stratejisine başvurduğu argümanını ileri sürmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:İttifaklar, uluslararası güvenlik ve devletler arası ilişkilerin gündemini belirleyen en temel olgulardan biridir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Devletlerin güvenlik stratejileri ve dış politikalarında önemli ölçüde yeri bulunan ittifaklar savaşların nedenleri ve sonuçları üzerinde de doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak önemli bir etkiye sahiptir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çalışma, Çin’den algılanan tehdide yanıt olarak ABD ve Japonya’nın bölgesel pozisyon ve güvenliğini korumak amacıyla bir ittifak kurma yöntemi olan dengeleme stratejisine başvurduğu argümanını ileri sürmektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:İttifak · Dengeleme · ABD-Japonya İttifakı

Özet

İttifaklar, uluslararası güvenlik ve devletler arası ilişkilerin gündemini belirleyen en temel olgulardan biridir. Devletlerin güvenlik stratejileri ve dış politikalarında önemli ölçüde yeri bulunan ittifaklar savaşların nedenleri ve sonuçları üzerinde de doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Bu kapsamda, Asya-Pasifik bölgesi son on yıllık dönemde devletler arası güç dengesinde yaşanan değişimlerin net bir biçimde gözlemlendiği ve ittifak sistemlerinin bölgesel güvenlik gündemi üzerinde önemli rol oynadığı bir coğrafya olma özelliği taşımaktadır. Materyal kapasitelerin dağılımındaki değişimler ve silahlanma süreci bir taraftan bölgesel güçler arasındaki belirsizlik ve endişe durumunu giderek yoğunlaştırırken, diğer taraftan bölgesel seviyede sıkı bir askeri ve jeopolitik rekabeti beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu çalışma rekabetin her geçen gün tırmandığı Asya-Pasifik bölgesindeki ittifak oluşumları üzerine kapsamlı bir analiz sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çin’in hızlı askeri modernizasyonu ve bölgesel seviyede aktif dış politika yaklaşımı Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD) ve Japonya tarafından kendi ulusal güvenliklerine yönelik bir tehdit kaynağı olarak yorumlanmaktadır. Bu tehdit algılamasına cevaben, ABD ve Japonya karşılıklı askeri ilişki ve savunma ortaklıklarını ilerletmekte ve kendi askeri kapasitelerini aşamalı olarak güçlendirmektedir. Bu kapsamda çalışma, ABD ve Japonya’nın Çin’e karşı nasıl ve neden ittifak oluşumuna başvurduğu sorusu üzerine odaklanmaktadır. Çalışma, Çin’den algılanan tehdide yanıt olarak ABD ve Japonya’nın bölgesel pozisyon ve güvenliğini korumak amacıyla bir ittifak kurma yöntemi olan dengeleme stratejisine başvurduğu argümanını ileri sürmektedir.

Abstract

Alliances are crucial and undated phenomena that determine the agenda of international security and inter-state relations. They shape the security strategies and foreign policies of states and have direct or indirect effect on the causes and consequences of wars. In this respect, Asia-Pacific is one of the hottest zones of international politics, where alliance systems play a vital role in relations among regional powers. Over the last decade, extraordinary shifts in the distribution of material capabilities and arms race have intensified uncertainty and anxiety among regional actors in the Asia-Pacific. The new security environment of the region has inevitably brought strict geopolitical competition at the regional level and has made alliances more visible and important than ever before. This article aims to analyze the formation process of alliances in the Asia-Pacific. China's fastened military buildup and modernization as well as its active foreign policy behavior cause its it to be perceived as a threat by the United States (US) and Japan to their national interests. In response, the US and Japan have stepped up their mutual military relations and defense contacts as well as their own independent military capabilities. From this perspective, the question in the study is why and how the US and Japan form a military alliance against China. The study’s argument is that the US and Japan implement balancing strategy by expanding their military and defense relations against the perceived threat from China in order to consolidate their security and preserve their position in the region.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çifçi, O. (2026). ÇİN’İN ASKERİ YÜKSELİŞİ VE ABD-JAPONYA İTTİFAKI: DENGELEME STRATEJİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR VAKA İNCELEMESİ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 2, 693–716. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1779922

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (64)

  1. Allen, K.W. & Garafola, C.L. (2021). 70 years of the PLA Air Force. China Aerospace Studies Institute. Bitzinger, R. (2011). Modernising China’s military, 1997-2012. China Perspectives, 4, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.5701.
  2. Chanlett-Avery, E. & Campbell, C. (2019). The U.S.-Japan alliance. Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL33740.pdf.
  3. China Defense White Paper. (2019). Ministry of National Defense of the People's Republic of China.https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/201907/24/content_WS5d3941ddc6d08408f502283d.html.
  4. Christensen, T. & Snyder, G. (1990). Chain gangs and passed bucks: predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization, 44(2), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035232.
  5. Clark, B. & Patt, D. (2023, Sep 5). U.S. deterrence against China is not working. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/09/05/us-military-china-deterrence-taiwan-defense-war-east-asia-indo-pacific-strategy/.
  6. Cliff, R. (2015). China’s military power: Assessing current and future capabilities. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Collinson, S. (2023, Feb 8). Biden’s dramatic warning to China. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/08/politics/china-biden-state-of-the-union/index.html.
  8. Fravel, T. & Medeiros, E.S. (2010). China’s search for assured retaliation: the evolution of Chinese nuclear strategy and force structure. International Security, 35(2), 48-87. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00016.
  9. Harper, J. (2021, Dec 8). Special report: US, Japan set to enhance cooperation on military R&D. National Defense Magazine. https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2021/12/8/us-japan-set-to-enhance-cooperation-on-military-rd.
  10. Ikenberry, G.J., Mastanduno, M. and Wolhforth, W.C. (2009). Introduction: Unipolarity, state behavior, and systemic consequences. World Politics, 61(1), 1-27.
  11. Japan Ministry of Defense. (2023). Defense of Japan 2023. Japan Ministry of Defense. https://www.mod.go.jp/en/publ/w_paper/wp_2023.html.
  12. Japan Ministry of Defense. (2024). Defense of Japan 2024. Japan Ministry of Defense. https://www.mod.go.jp/en/publ/w_paper/index.html.
  13. Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2015). The guidelines for Japan-U.S. defense cooperation. Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000078188.pdf.
  14. Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2024, Aug 28). Japan-U.S. Space Cooperation. https://www.mofa.go.jp/fp/msp/pagewe_000001_00069.html.
  15. Keohane, R. O. (2012). Twenty years of institutional liberalism. International Relations, 26(2), 125-138. doi: 10.1177/0047117812438451.
  16. Kraska, J. (2020, Aug 6). Japan’s legal response in the gray zone. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/08/japans-legal-response-in-the-gray-zone/.
  17. Kristensen, H.M., Korda, M. & Reynolds, E. (2023). Chinese nuclear weapons, 2023. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 79(2), 108-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2023.2178713.
  18. Lake, J. (2023, Mar 14). China’s stealthy area denial. Asian Military Review. https://www.asianmilitaryreview.com/2023/03/chinas-stealthy-area-denial/.
  19. Lei, Z. (2017, Oct 27). PLA to be world-class force by 2050. China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2017-10/27/content_33756453.htm.
  20. Li, X. (2022). The dragon’s wing: The people’s liberation army air force’s strategy. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs.
  21. Liska, G. (1968). Nation in alliances: Limits of independence. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  22. Magnier, M. & Razdan, K. (2024, Apr 12). Japanese PM Kishida supports ‘indispensable’ global role of US, citing threat by China. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/3258710/japanese-pm-kishida-supports-indispensable-global-role-us-citing-threat-china.
  23. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). Tragedy of great power politics. W.W. Norton and Company.
  24. Mearsheimer, J.J. (2009). Reckless states and realism. International Relations, 23(2), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117809104637.
  25. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553.
  26. Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics among nations: Stuggle for power and peace. Alfred A. Knopf.
  27. Morrison, W. M. (2019). China’s economic rise: History, trends, challenges, and implications for the United States. Congressional Research Service. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL33534.
  28. Murakami, S. (2023, Aug 31). Japan makes record defence spending request amid tension with China. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/japan-makes-record-defence-spending-request-amid-tension-with-china-2023-08-31/.
  29. Nurkin, T. & Hinata-Yamaguchi, R. (2020). Emerging technologies and future of US-Japan defense collaboration. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/uncategorized/emerging-defense-technologies-and-the-future-of-us-japan-defense-collaboration/.
  30. O’Rourke, R. (2024). China naval modernization: Implications for U.S. navy capabilities-Background and issues for congress. The US Congress. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL33153.pdf.
  31. Pajon, C. (2016). Japan and its alliance with the US. structure, dynamics and evolution to 2030. Études de l’Ifri.
  32. Parent, J.M. & Rosato, S. (2015). Balancing in neorealism. International Security, 40(2), 51-86. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00216.
  33. Paul, T. V. (2005). Soft balancing in the age of U.S. primacy. International Security, 30(1), 46-71. https://doi.org/10.1162/0162288054894652.
  34. Rappeport, A. (2019, Sep 20). Trump calls China a ‘threat to the world’ as trade talks approach. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/20/us/politics/trump-china-theat-to-world.html.
  35. Rinehart, I. E. & Elias, B. (2015). China’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ). Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/R43894.pdf
  36. Schweller, R. L. (1994). Bandwagoning for profit: bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security, 19(1), 72-107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539149.
  37. Shaw, H. (1999). The Diaoyutai/Senkaku islands dispute: its history and analysis of the ownership claims of the P.R.C., R.O.C. and Japan. Occasional Papers/Reprint Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 3(152).
  38. SIPRI. (2024, Apr 22). Global military spending surges amid war, rising tensions and insecurity. SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2024/global-military-spending-surges-amid-war-rising-tensions-and-insecurity.
  39. Smith, D. (2024, Apr 10). US and Japan announce new military agreements aimed at countering China. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/10/us-japan-military-agreement.
  40. Snyder, G. H. (1984). The security dilemma in alliance politics. World Politics, 36(4), 461-495. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010183.
  41. Snyder, G. H. (1991). Alliances, Balance, and Stability. International Organization, 45(1), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001417.
  42. Takahashi, K. (2023, Sep 18). “U.S. navy’s latest unmanned surface ships call in Japan”. Naval News. https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2023/09/u-s-navys-latest-unmanned-surface-ships-call-in-japan/.
  43. Takeneka, K. (2021, Dec 24). Japan Plans Record Defense Spending in 2022 with 10th Straight Annual Increase. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/japan-plans-record-defence-spending-2022-with-10th-straight-annual-increase-2021-12-24/.
  44. The Guardian. (2022, Mar 21). China has fully militarized three islands in South China Sea, US admiral says.
  45. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/21/china-has-fully-militarized-three-islands-in-south-china-sea-us-admiral-says.
  46. The Science of Military Strategy. (2020). National Defense University Press.
  47. The US Department of Defense. (2023, Mar 13). Department of Defense releases the president’s fiscal year 2024 defense budget. The US Department of Defense.https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3326875/department-of-defense-releases-the-presidents-fiscal-year-2024-defense-budget/.
  48. The US Department of Defense. (2024). Military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. The US Department of Defense. https://media.defense.gov/2024/dec/18/2003615520/-1/-1/0/military-and-security-developments-involving-the-peoples-republic-of-china-2024.pdf.
  49. The US Department of State. (2025). U.S. security cooperation with Japan. The US Department of State. https://www.state.gov/u-s-security-cooperation-with-japan/.
  50. The US National Security Strategy. (2022). The White House. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/8-November-Combined-PDF-for-Upload.pdf.
  51. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2024). Regional Analysis Brief: East China Sea. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/regions-of-interest/East_China_Sea.
  52. Vergun, D. (2024, Nov 7). U.S.-Japan alliance increasingly strengthened since end of WWII. The US Department of Defense. https://www.defense.gov/News/Feature-Stories/Story/Article/2306658/us-japan-alliance-increasingly-strengthened-since-end-of-wwii/.
  53. Walt, S. M. (1985). Alliance formation and the balance of world power. International Security, 9(4), 3-43.
  54. Walt, S.M. (1997). Why alliances endure or collapse. Survival, 39(1), 156-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396339708442901.
  55. Walt, S.M. (2009). Alliances in a unipolar world. World Politics, 61(1), 86-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109000045.
  56. Waltz, K. N. (1964). The stability of bipolar world. Daedalus, 93(3), 881-909.
  57. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
  58. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.
  59. Wezeman, P. D., Gadon, J. ve Wezeman, S.T. (2023). Trends in International Arms Transfer, 2022. Stockholm: SIPRI.
  60. Wezeman, P.D., Djokic, K., George, M., Hussain, Z. & Wezeman, S.T. (2024). Trends in international arms transfer, 2023. SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2024/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-international-arms-transfers-2023.
  61. World Bank. China 2030: Building a modern, harmonious, and creative high-income society. World Bank.https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/74a6d2cc-ffb6-5340-86bb-ece1507f52ca/content.
  62. Wright, T. (2020, Oct 23). Chinese Plaaf H-6N pictured carrying large missile. The International Institute for Security Studies. https://www.iiss.org/online-analysis/online-analysis/2020/10/mdi-chinese-plaaf-h-6n-missile.
  63. Yamaguchi, M. (2023, Dec 23). Japan cabinet oks record military budget to speed up strike capability, eases lethal arms export ban. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/japan-military-budget-us-china-missile-5e1e2c40890b3ca8ea682c2dc91f9553ç.
  64. Fravel, T. & Medeiros, E.S. (2010). China’s search for assured retaliation: the evolution of Chinese nuclear strategy and force structure. International Security, 35(2), 48-87. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00016.