KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2024 / Volume: 13 Issue: 4

Virtual Classroom Management: An Analysis of Virtual Classroom Management Dynamics and Strategies of Teachers

Aylin Kirişçi Sarıkaya(İZMİR DEMOKRASİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7443-8433
Hanifi Parlar(İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6313-6955
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-10-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results highlight the significance of engagement and motivation toward virtual classrooms and propound teachers' digital competencies and classroom management skills as two fundamental factors in fostering students' engagement in virtual classrooms.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Digital learning platforms and virtual classrooms are growing more widespread, so virtual classroom management is gaining more importance to ensure student engagement, involvement, and achievements in an online learning environment.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research examines virtual classroom management dynamics and explores the factors that render teachers’ virtual classroom management practices, strategies, and expectations in this regard.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results highlight the significance of engagement and motivation toward virtual classrooms and propound teachers' digital competencies and classroom management skills as two fundamental factors in fostering students' engagement in virtual classrooms.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:virtual classroom · classroom management · online learning

Abstract

Digital learning platforms and virtual classrooms are growing more widespread, so virtual classroom management is gaining more importance to ensure student engagement, involvement, and achievements in an online learning environment. The research examines virtual classroom management dynamics and explores the factors that render teachers’ virtual classroom management practices, strategies, and expectations in this regard. The study is a phenomenological research, and data was collected through open-ended questions with 22 lower secondary school teachers working in Istanbul. The findings were gathered under four themes: virtual classroom management process, professional development, opportunities and challenges of virtual classrooms, and solutions to virtual classroom management problems. These results highlight the significance of engagement and motivation toward virtual classrooms and propound teachers' digital competencies and classroom management skills as two fundamental factors in fostering students' engagement in virtual classrooms.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sarıkaya, A. K., Parlar, H. (2024). Virtual Classroom Management: An Analysis of Virtual Classroom Management Dynamics and Strategies of Teachers. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1332899

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (98)

  1. Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online Learning amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45-51.
  2. Akkus, I. & Acar, S. (2017). Eş zamanlı Öğrenme Ortamlarında Karşılaşılan Teknik Sorunların Öğretici ve Öğrenen Üzerindeki Etkisini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 363-376. doi: 10.17679/inuefd.340479
  3. Albashtawi, A., & Al Bataineh, K. (2020). The effectiveness of google classroom among EFL students in Jordan: an innovative teaching and learning online platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(11), 78-88.
  4. Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A., and Hew, S. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: a one-decade review. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25, 3677–3704. doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10134-2
  5. Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages, and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.
  6. Arslan, Y. & Sumuer, E. (2020). Covid-19 Döneminde Sanal Siniflarda Öğretmenlerin Karşilastiklari Sinif Yönetimi Sorunlari, Millî Eğitim, 49(1), 201-230.
  7. Atabay, M., Gulluoglu, K., & Simsek, M. (2023). Reflections of Classroom Management Processes on Virtual Classroom Environments. International journal of computers in education, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8102610
  8. Barak, M., Hussein-Farraj, R. & Dori, Y.J. On-campus or online: examining self-regulation and cognitive transfer skills in different learning settings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0035-9
  9. Basar, H. (2001). Sınıf yönetimi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
  10. Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis, NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001.
  11. Benda, P., Lohr, V., & David, J. (2007). Difference between classical and virtual type of education, Summer University on Information Technology in Agriculture and Rural Development. Retrieved from ConfProceeding (psu.edu)
  12. Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: a systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
  13. Brophy, J. (1998). Classroom Management as Socializing Students Into Clearly Articulated Roles. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 33(1), 1–4.
  14. Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating Students to Learn. (3rd ed.). Routledge, Abingdon-on-Thames.
  15. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Budhrani, K., Martin, F., Malabanan, O., & Espiritu, J. L. (2021). How did parents balance it all? Work-from-home parents’ engagement in academic and support roles during remote learning. Journal of Online Learning Research, 7(2), 153-184.
  17. Burden, P. R. (1995). Classroom management and discipline: Methods to facilitate cooperation and instruction. London: Longman
  18. Can, E. (2020). Sanal sınıf yönetimi: İlkeler, uygulamalar ve öneriler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 251-295
  19. Carter Jr, R.A., Rice, M., Yang, S. and Jackson, H.A. (2020). Self-regulated learning in online learning environments: strategies for remote learning, Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0114
  20. Casely-Hayford, J., Björklund, C., Bergström, G., Lindqvist, P., & Kwak, L. (2022). What makes teachers stay? A cross-sectional exploration of the individual and contextual factors associated with teacher retention in Sweden. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103664.
  21. Celep, C. (2008). Sınıf Yönetiminde Kuram ve Uygulama (3. baskı), Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  22. Celik, V. (2002). Sınıf Yönetimi, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara.
  23. Chen, Y., & He, W. (2013). Security risks and protection in online learning: A survey. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5), 108-127.
  24. Cho, M. H. & Shen, D. (2013) Self-regulation in online learning, Distance Education, 34(3), 290-301, doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
  25. Clark, R. C., & Kwinn, A. (2007). The new virtual classroom: Evidence-based guidelines for synchronous e-learning. Pfeiffer/John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Christopher, D., & Hyder, K. (2014). The successful virtual classroom: How to design and facilitate interactive and engaging live online learning. AMACOM.
  27. Corkin, D. M., Ekmekci, A., & Parr, R. (2018). The effects of the school-work environment on mathematics teachers' motivation for teaching: A self-determination theoretical perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 43(6), 50-66.
  28. Cortes, V. M., Montero, A. I., Iligan, M. B., Santillan, D. Y., & Undalok, S. B. (2022). Teacher Classroom Management Practices in an Inclusive Virtual Setting. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED), 4(3), 126-133.
  29. Djigic, G. & Stojiljkovic, S. (2011). Classroom management styles, classroom climate and school achievement. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 819-828
  30. Dos Santos, L. M. (2022) Online learning after the Covid-19 pandemic: Learners’ motivations. Frontiers in Education. 7:879091. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.879091
  31. Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. Wittrock (Ed.). Handbook of research on teaching. (3rd ed), p.392-431. New York: McMillian
  32. Egeberg, H., McConney, A. & Price, A. (2021). Teachers’ views on effective classroom management: a mixed-methods investigation in Western Australian high schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 20, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-020-09270-w
  33. Evertson, C.M. & Weinstein, C.S. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874783
  34. Fayda-Kinik, F. S. (2022). The Digital Teacher: The TPACK Framework for Teacher Training. In A. Afonso, L. Morgado, & L. Roque (Eds.), Impact of Digital Transformation in Teacher Training Models, p.31-53. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9538-1.ch002
  35. Finnegan, C., Morris, L. V., & Lee, K. (2008). Differences by Course Discipline on Student Behavior, Persistence, and Achievement in Online Courses of Undergraduate General Education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.10.1.d
  36. Franklin, H., & Harrington, I. (2019). A Review into Effective Classroom Management and Strategies for Student Engagement: Teacher and Student Roles in Today’s Classrooms. Journal of Education and Training Studies. DOI:10.11114/jets.v7i12.4491
  37. Future Learn (2022). Online learning in a post-pandemic world: The Future of Learning Report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.futurelearn.com/info/insights/online-learning-post-pandemic
  38. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
  39. Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems, 12(4), 436-445.
  40. Hsu, S., Marques, O., Hamza, M. K., & Alhalabi, B. (1999). How To Design a Virtual Classroom: 10 Easy Steps to Follow. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 27, 96-108.
  41. Han, J. & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers, Cogent Education, 3:1, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819
  42. Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. New York: Routledge/Taylor &Francis.
  43. Harkins, A. M. (2008). Leapfrog principles and practices: Core components of education 3.0 and 4.0. Futures Research Quarterly, 24(1), 19-31.
  44. Hinrichsen, J., & Coombs, A. (2014). The five resources of critical digital literacy: a framework for curriculum integration. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21334
  45. Karakaya, F., Arik, S., Cimen, O., & Yilmaz, M. (2020). Investigation of the views of biology teachers on distance education during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 6(4), 246-258. doi:10.21891/ jeseh.792984
  46. Kaya, S. (2011). Sanal sınıf yönetiminde görev alacak öğretim elemanlarının eğitim gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi
  47. Keshavarz, M., Mirmoghtadaie, Z., & Nayyeri, S. (2022). Design and validation of the virtual classroom management questionnaire. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 120-135.
  48. Kerssens, N. & van Dijck, J. (2021) The platformization of primary education in The Netherlands, Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 250-263, DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2021.1876725
  49. Kilic, M. E., Kilic, M. & Akan, D. (2021). Motivation in the classroom. Participatory Educational Research, 8 (2), 31-56. DOI: 10.17275/per.21.28.8.2
  50. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
  51. Knopik, T., Błaszczak, A., Maksymiuk, R., & Oszwa, U. (2021). Parental involvement in remote learning during the COVID‐19 pandemic—Dominant approaches and their diverse implications. European Journal of Education, 56(4), 623-640.
  52. Ko, S. S. & Rossen, S. (2017). Teaching Online: A practical guide (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  53. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. London: Routledge
  54. Li, C. & Lalani, F. (2020). The Covid-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-online-digital-learning/
  55. Li, F., Jin, T., Edirisingha, P., & Zhang, X. (2021). School-aged students’ sustainable online learning engagement during Covid-19: community of inquiry in a Chinese secondary education context. Sustainability, 13(18), 10147.
  56. Lunenburg, F.C. & Ornstein, A.C. (2008). Education administration: Concepts and practices (5th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning
  57. Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom Management That Works. Research-Based Strategies for Every Teacher. New York: Pearson Education.
  58. Mashhadia, Z. V. & Kargozarib, M. R. (2011). Influences of digital classrooms on education. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1178–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.190.
  59. Mayer, R. E. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (p. 43–71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
  60. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  61. McInnerney, J. M., & Roberts, T. S. (2004). Online learning: Social interaction and the creation of a sense of community. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 73-81.
  62. McGarr, O., & McDonagh, A. (2021). Exploring the digital competence of pre-service teachers on entry onto an initial teacher education programme in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 40(1), 115-128.
  63. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
  64. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  65. MoNE (2023a). EBA education platform ranked 1st in the world. Retrieved from https://www.meb.gov.tr/eba-education-platform-ranked-1st-in-the-world/haber/21870/en
  66. MoNE (2023b). Third phase of face-to-face education in schools will begin on November 2. Retrieved from https://www.meb.gov.tr/third-phase-of-face-to-face-education-in-schools-will-begin-on-november-2/haber/21861/en
  67. Mohan, G., McCoy, S., Carroll, E., Mihut, G., Lyons, S., & Domhnaill, C. M. (2020). Learning for all? Second-level education in Ireland during COVID-19 (ESRI survey and statistical report series number 92). ESRI. https://doi.org/10.26504/sustat92
  68. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
  69. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance education, 26(1), 29-48.
  70. Neuwirth, L. S., Jović, S. and Mukherji, B. R. (2020). Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education. doi:10.1177/1477971420947738
  71. Nousopoulou, E., Kamariotou, M., & Kitsios, F. (2022). Digital Transformation Strategy in Post-COVID Era: Innovation Performance Determinants and Digital Capabilities in Driving Schools. Information, 13(7), 323.
  72. O'Connor, C; Joffe, H; (2020) Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-13. 10.1177/1609406919899220.
  73. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition. Sage Publications, Inc. Randall.
  74. Puentedura, R. (2012). The SAMR Model: Background and Exemplars. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2012/08/23/SAMR_BackgroundExemplars.pdf
  75. Power, K. & Goodnough, K. (2019) Fostering teachers’ autonomous motivation during professional learning: a self-determination theory perspective, Teaching Education, 30(3), 278-298, doi: 10.1080/10476210.2018.1465035
  76. Radel, R., Sarrazin, P., Legrain, P., & Wild, T. C. (2010). Social contagion of motivation between teacher and student: Analyzing underlying processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 577–587.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019051
  77. Reisoglu, I., & Cebi, A. (2020). How can the digital competences of pre-service teachers be developed? Examining a case study through the lens of DigComp and DigCompEdu. Computers & Education, 156, 103940.
  78. Rufai, M. M., Alebiosu, S.O., & Adeakin, O. A. S. (2015). A Conceptual Model for Virtual Classroom Management. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJCSEIT), 5(1), 27-32.
  79. Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53, 593– 619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
  80. Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
  81. Sari, T., & Nayir, F. (2020). Challenges in Distance Education During the (Covid-19) Pandemic Period. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(3), 328–360. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.5872
  82. Schiefele, U. (2017). Classroom management and mastery-oriented instruction as mediators of the effects of teacher motivation on student motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.004
  83. Smedley, J. K. (2010). Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR Insight, 23, 233-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ori.2010.11
  84. Soykan E, Bastas, M. & Çakici, A. (2023) Editorial: Digital transformation of education in the COVID-19 process and its psychological effects on children. Frontiers in Education. 8 (1117458). doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1117458 Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
  85. Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly,47, 496-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185
  86. UNESCO (2018). UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. Version 3. Paris. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
  87. Uysal, H., Burçak, F., Tepetaş, G. S. & Akman, B. (2014). Preschool education and primary school preservice teachers’ perceptions about classroom management: A metaphorical analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 7(2), 165-180.
  88. WHO (2020). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID19 -March 2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
  89. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.
  90. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315421056
  91. van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315422657
  92. Yıldırım, A. & Simsek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  93. Yilmazsoy, B., Ozdinc, F. & Kahraman, M. (2018). Sanal sınıf ortamında sınıf yönetimine yönelik öğrenci görüşleri: Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Örneği. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 8(3), 513-525.
  94. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Towards a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294.
  95. Wolfgang, C. H., & Glickman, C. D. (1986). Solving discipline problems: Strategies for classroom teachers. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
  96. Wolfgang, C. H. (1995). Solving discipline problems: Strategies for classroom teachers (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  97. Wright, K. (2005). Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x.
  98. Wright, K. (2005). Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x.