KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 3

One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*

Esra Çam(YALOVA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7598-2606
Pınar Salı(BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2711-6997
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-07-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study’s findings offer important implications for material designers and ELT scholars.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The global spread of English in recent years has made the native speaker ideology, dominant in ELT for years, questionable.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Recent studies on English textbooks point to a shift from the inner circle bias towards a more pluralistic approach, embracing the different uses and users of English and the variety of associated cultural elements.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study’s findings offer important implications for material designers and ELT scholars.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:English as an International Language (EIL) · expanding circle · inner circle

Abstract

The global spread of English in recent years has made the native speaker ideology, dominant in ELT for years, questionable. Recent studies on English textbooks point to a shift from the inner circle bias towards a more pluralistic approach, embracing the different uses and users of English and the variety of associated cultural elements. This study aims to analyse two textbooks commonly used in Turkey to teach English, Language Hub Elementary and English File Fourth Edition Elementary. The textbooks are evaluated in line with the concept of English as an International Language (EIL) drawing on Kachru's framework, the Three Concentric Circles of the English Language. The results reveal that these two recently published books do not represent the diversity of English uses, users, and local cultures from the outer circle counties. Compared to English File Fourth Edition Elementary, Language Hub Elementary shows a more pluralistic approach, presenting a sheer number of characters and a variety of accents and cultural elements from the expanding circle. On the other hand, a marked bias towards inner circle characters, their standard English, and the elements of Anglo-Saxon culture has been identified in English File Fourth Edition Elementary. The aspects specific to Turkish culture are unavailable in Language Hub Elementary and are quite limited in English File Fourth Edition Elementary. The study’s findings offer important implications for material designers and ELT scholars.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çam, E., Salı, P. (2025). One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 14 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1280686

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (57)

  1. Asakereh, A., Yousofi, N., & Weisi, H. (2019). Critical content analysis of English textbooks used in the Iranian education system: Focusing on ELF features. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 1016-1038.
  2. Bayyurt, Y., & Sifakis, N. (2015). Developing an ELF-aware pedagogy: Insights from a self-education programme. In P. Vettorel (Ed.), New frontiers in teaching and learning English (pp. 55–76). New Castle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  3. Bose, P., & Gao, X. (2022). Cultural representations in Indian English language teaching textbooks. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082102
  4. Braine, G. (2010). Nonnative speaker English teachers: Research, pedagogy, and professional growth. New York, NY: Routledge.
  5. Brown, J. D. (2012). EIL curriculum development. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. Mckay, G. Hu, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 147–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
  6. Canagarajah, S. (2006). The place of World Englishes in composition: Pluralization continued. College Composition and Communication, 57(4), 586-619.
  7. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. X. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp.196-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Crawford, J. (1990). How authentic is the language in our classrooms? Prospect, 6(1), 47- 54.
  9. Creswell, J. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  10. Çelik, S., & Erbay, Ş. (2013). Cultural perspectives of Turkish ELT coursebooks: Do standardized teaching texts incorporate intercultural features? Education and Science, 38(167), 336-351.
  11. Demirbaş, M. N. (2013). Investigating intercultural elements in English coursebooks. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD)14(2), 291-304.
  12. Dolgunsöz, E., & Yi̇ği̇t, M. A. (2022). A cross-national investigation of cultural representations in Iranian and Turkish ELT coursebooks. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 7(2), 206-2019. https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v7i2.2780
  13. Ethnologue. (2020). English: A language of United Kingdom. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/eng
  14. Formanowicz, M., & Suitner, C. (2020). Sounding strange(r): Origins, consequences, and boundary conditions of sociophonetic discrimination. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19884354
  15. Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing Global Englishes. Abingdon: Routledge.
  16. Gray, J. (2002). The global coursebook in English language teaching. In D. Block and D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp.151–167). London: Routledge.
  17. Gray, J. (2010). The construction of English: Culture, consumerism and promotion in the ELT global coursebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Guerra, L., Cavalheiro, L., Pereira, R., Kurt, Y., Öztekin, E., Candan, E., & Bayyurt, Y. (2020). Representations of the English as a Lingua Franca Framework: Identifying ELF-aware activities in Portuguese and Turkish coursebooks. RELC Journal, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220935478
  19. Hanashiro, K. (2016). How globalism is represented in English textbooks in Japan. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Paper Series, 14, 2–13.
  20. Hu, G., & McKay, S. L. (2014). Multilingualism as portrayed in a Chinese English textbook. In J. Conteth & G. Meier (Eds.), The multilingual turn in language education: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 64-88). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  21. Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  22. Kachru, B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Quirk R, Widdowson H (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp.11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Karakuş, E. (2021). A systematic review of the representation of cultural elements in English as a foreign language textbooks. Language Teaching and Educational Research, 4(1), 13-29.
  24. Keles, U., & Yazan, B. (2020). Representation of cultures and communities in a global ELT textbook: A diachronic content analysis. Language Teaching Research, 27, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820976922
  25. Kırkgöz, Y., & Ağçam, R. (2018). Exploring culture in locally published English textbooks for primary education in Türkiye. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(1), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.445
  26. Kopperoinen, A. (2011). Accents of English as a Lingua Franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00263.x
  27. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  28. Latham-Koenig, C., Oxeden, C., & Lambert, J. (2019). English file elementary (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Le, T. (2022). An evaluation of three national high school English textbooks in Vietnam from a global Englishes language teaching perspective [Master's thesis]. University of Oxford.
  30. Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485
  31. Maggs, P., Smith, C., & Tennant, A. (2019). Language Hub Elementary. Macmillan Education.
  32. Matsuda, A. (2002). Representation of users and uses of English in beginning Japanese EFL textbooks. JALT Journal, 24(2), 182-201. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ24.2-5
  33. Matsuda, A. (2003). Incorporating World Englishes in teaching English as an International Language. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 719-729. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588220
  34. Matsuda, A. (2012). Teaching material in EIL. In L. Alsagoff, G. Hu, S. L. Mckay, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an International Language (pp.168–185). New York, NY: Routledge.
  35. Matsuda, A. (2019). World Englishes in English language teaching: Kachru’s six fallacies and the TEIL paradigm. World Englishes, 38(1–2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12368
  36. Matsuda, A., & Friedrich, P. (2011). English as an international language: A curriculum blueprint. World Englishes, 30(3), 332-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2011.01717.x
  37. McKay, S. L. (2012). Teaching materials for English as an International Language. In A. Matsuda (Ed.), Principles and practices of teaching English as an International Language (pp.70–83). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  38. Naji Meidani, E., & Pishghadam, R. (2013). Analysis of English language textbooks in the light of English as an International Language (EIL): A comparative study. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(2), 83-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.163
  39. Nguyen, T. T. M., Marlina, R., & Cao, T. H. (2021). How well do ELT textbooks prepare students to use English in global contexts? An evaluation of the Vietnamese English textbooks from an English as an international language (EIL) perspective. Asian Englishes, 23(2), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2020.1717794
  40. Park, J. S., & Wee, L. (2009). The three circles redux. Applied Linguistics 30(3), 389–406. Rose H, Galloway N. (2019). Global Englishes for Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  41. Schmitz, J. (2014). Looking under Kachru’s (1982, 1985) three circles model of World Englishes: The hidden reality and current challenges. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 14(2), 373-411. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982014005000010
  42. Shin, J., Eslami, Z., & Chen, W.-C. (2011). Presentation of local and international culture in current international English-language teaching textbooks. Language Culture and Curriculum, 24(3), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2011.614694
  43. Sifakis, N. C. (2014). ELF-awareness as an opportunity for change: A transformative perspective for ESOL teacher education. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3(2), 315-333.
  44. Sifakis, N. C., & Bayyurt, Y. (2017). ELF-aware teacher education and development. In J. Jenkins, W. Baker, & M. Dewey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca (pp.456–467). London: Routledge.
  45. Syrbe, M., & Rose, H. (2018). An evaluation of the global orientation of English textbooks in Germany. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1120736
  46. Tajeddin, Z., & Pakzadian, M. (2020). Representation of inner, outer and expanding circle varieties and cultures in global ELT textbooks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00089-9
  47. Takahashi, R. (2014). An analysis of ELF-oriented features in ELT coursebooks. English Today, 30, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078413000539
  48. Tomlinson, B., & Mashuhara, H. (2013). Adult coursebooks. ELT Journal, 67(2), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct007
  49. Vettorel, P. (2008). EYL textbooks, ELF and intercultural awareness: Only Xmas, Easter, and double-deckers? Perspectives, 35 (1), 45-68.
  50. Vettorel, P. (2010). EIL/ELF and representation of culture in textbooks: Only food, fairs, folklore and facts? In C. Gagliardi & A. Maley (Eds.), EIL, ELF, Global English: Teaching and Learning Issues (pp.153-185). Bern: Peter Lang.
  51. Vettorel, P. (2018). ELF and communication strategies: Are they taken into account in ELT materials? RELC Journal, 49(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217746204
  52. Vettorel, P., & Lopriore, L. (2013). Is there ELF in ELT coursebooks? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 483. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.4.3
  53. Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587438
  54. Yamanaka, N. (2006). An evaluation of English textbooks in Japan from the viewpoint of nations in the inner, outer, and expanding circles. JALT Journal, 28(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ28.1-4
  55. Yi̇ği̇t, M. A., & Dolgunsöz, E. (2023). A cross-cultural analysis of a Turkish EFL textbook: Hu and McKay’s Analytic Framework. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 36, 1321-1332. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1369167
  56. Yuen, K. M. (2011). The representation of foreign cultures in English textbooks. ELT Journal, 65(4), 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq089
  57. Zhang, X., & Su, X. (2021). A cross-national analysis of cultural representations in English textbooks used in China and Germany. SN Social Sciences, 1(4), 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00088-8