KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3

İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ TOPLUMSAL DUYARLILIK VE SOSYAL ADALET DÜZEYLERİ İLE YENİ MEDYA OKURYAZARLIKLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHER CANDIDATES’ SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE LEVELS AND THEIR NEW MEDIA LITERACY

Servet Çelik(TRABZON ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2908-2551
Esin Saylan(TRABZON ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7629-8283
Nuray Çaylak(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6014-9152
Pınar Kefeli Berber(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4563-0247
Sayfa
1332–1372
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel medya üretimi becerileri ile toplumsal duyarlılık ve sosyal adalet düzeyleri arasında pozitif yönde bir ilişki ortaya koymuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Günümüzde dijital medya kullanımının yaygınlaşmasıyla, fiziksel ortamlar için kullanılan toplumsal duyarlılık ve sosyal adalet kavramları, dijital ortamlar için de kullanılmaya başlanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Hem bu yeni dijital dünyada adaletin sağlanması hem de dijital medya araçlarının gerçek dünyada sosyal adaleti sağlama konusundaki etkisi önem kazanmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel medya üretimi becerileri ile toplumsal duyarlılık ve sosyal adalet düzeyleri arasında pozitif yönde bir ilişki ortaya koymuştur.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dijital medya · Yeni medya · Dijital okuryazarlık

Özet

Günümüzde dijital medya kullanımının yaygınlaşmasıyla, fiziksel ortamlar için kullanılan toplumsal duyarlılık ve sosyal adalet kavramları, dijital ortamlar için de kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Hem bu yeni dijital dünyada adaletin sağlanması hem de dijital medya araçlarının gerçek dünyada sosyal adaleti sağlama konusundaki etkisi önem kazanmıştır. Bu durum sosyal yapının bir parçası olan okullarda, öğretmenlere de yeni sorumluluklar yüklemiştir. Bu bağlamda yürütülen çalışmada İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının dijital medya kullanım yeterlikleri ile toplumsal duyarlılık ve sosyal adalet düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. İlişkisel desenin kullanıldığı araştırma İngilizce Öğretmenliği programında öğrenim görmekte olan 33 son sınıf öğrencisi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın amacına uygun olarak araştırmanın verileri Yeni Medya Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği ve Sosyal Sorunlar Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının medya okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve toplumsal sorunlara karşı duyarlılıkları ve sosyal adalet algıları arasındaki ilişki Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon katsayısı kullanarak korelasyon analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel medya üretimi becerileri ile toplumsal duyarlılık ve sosyal adalet düzeyleri arasında pozitif yönde bir ilişki ortaya koymuştur. Bu araştırma, öğretmen yetiştirme programlarında dijital medya kullanımına ilişkin becerilere yer verilmesinin, gelecekte öğretmenlerin bu yeni çevrim içi dünyada eleştirel tüketici ve üretici olarak var olmaları ve aynı zamanda toplumda sosyal adalet kültürünün gelişmesi açısından önemli olduğuna dikkat çekmektedir.

Abstract

With the widespread use of digital media today, the concepts of social responsibility and social justice, traditionally applied in physical environments, are now also considered with respect to digital environments, as well. As such, the role of digital media tools in ensuring social justice has gained importance, particularly in the context of education, implying a new responsibility for teachers. With this in mind, the current study was designed to identify the existence of a relationship, if any, between pre-service English language teachers' use of digital media and their levels of social sensitivity and justice. The research was carried out with 33 senior students who were studying in an English Language Teaching program at a Turkish university. The instruments in the study consisted of the New Media Literacy Scale and the Social Issues Scale. The relationship between pre-service English language teachers' media literacy proficiency levels and their sensitivity to social problems, as well as their perceptions of social justice, were examined using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient in the correlation analysis. The findings revealed a positive relationship between the critical media production skills of the teacher candidates and their social sensitivity and social justice levels. This research draws attention to the development of digitally literate candidates in teacher training programs; in this sense, future teachers exist as online critical consumers and producers, simultaneously contributing to societal development.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çelik, S., Saylan, E., Çaylak, N., Berber, P. K. (2021). İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ TOPLUMSAL DUYARLILIK VE SOSYAL ADALET DÜZEYLERİ İLE YENİ MEDYA OKURYAZARLIKLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3, 1332–1372. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.934052

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (81)

  1. Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670
  2. Akmeşe, Z., ve Deniz, K. (2016). Dijital aktivizm olarak video aktivizm: Redhack belgeselleri. Yeni Medya Çalışmaları II. Ulusal Kongre (Dijital Aktivizm), 496-511. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303751813
  3. Aldunate, R., ve Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 519-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017
  4. Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media literacy. A report of the national leadership conference on medial literacy. Aspen Institute, Communications and Society Program. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED365294.pdf
  5. Bay, D. N. (2021) Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(7), 172-187.
  6. Bell, L. A. (2016). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. M. Adams, L. A. Bell, D. J. Goodman, ve K. Y. Joshi (Ed.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (3. baskı) (ss. 3-26). Routledge.
  7. Blevins, J. L., Lee, J. J., McCabe, E. E., ve Edgerton, E. (2019). Tweeting for social justice in #Ferguson: Affective discourse in Twitter hashtags. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1636-1653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819827030
  8. Bennett, S., Maton, K., ve Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
  9. Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.43
  10. Buckingham, D. (2015). Defining digital literacy: What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, Special Issue, 10, 21-34. https://www.idunn.no/file/pdf/66808541/defining_digital_literacy_-_what_do_young_people_need_to_kn.pdf
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel, F. (2015). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (19. baskı). Pegem.
  12. Careless, E. (2015). Social media for social justice in adult education: A critical theoretical framework. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 13-26. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8cde/aff3fdf8b76e741c55961a470bbee9e9a80b.pdf
  13. Carson, T. (2005). Beyond instrumentalism: The significance of teacher identity in educational change. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 3(2), 1-8. http://jcacs.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jcacs/article/download/16973/15775/
  14. Chen, D. T., Lin, T. B., Li, J. Y., ve Lee, L. (2018). Establishing the norm of new media literacy of Singaporean students: Implications to policy and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 124, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.010
  15. Chen, D. T., Wu, J., ve Wang, Y. M. (2011). Unpacking new media literacy. Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(2), 84-88. http://www.iiisci.org/journal/sci/FullText.asp?var=&id=OL508KR
  16. Chera, P., ve Wood, C. (2003). Animated multimedia ‘talking books’ can promote phonological awareness in children beginning to read. Learning and Instruction, 13, 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00035-4
  17. Christensen, R., ve Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. J. Voogt, ve G. Knezek (Ed.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (ss. 349-365). Springer.
  18. Cochran-Smith, M. (2009). Toward a theory of teacher education for social justice. A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, ve D. Hopkins (Ed.), Second international handbook of educational change (ss. 445-467). Springer.
  19. Cooper, J. M (2015). Correlates of social justice self-efficacy and commitment of school psychology trainees (Doktora tezi, Ohio Devlet Üniversitesi). http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1429306981
  20. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3. baskı). SAGE.
  21. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4. baskı). Pearson.
  22. Din, F., ve Calao, J. (2001). The effects of playing educational video games on kindergarten achievement. Child Study Journal, 31(2), 95-102.
  23. Ertmer, P. A., ve Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
  24. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival in the digital era. Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/4793/
  25. Fisch, S., Shulman, J., Akerman, A., ve Levin, G. (2002). Reading between the pixels: Parent-child interaction while reading online storybooks. Early Education and Development, 13(1), 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1304_7
  26. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., ve Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Springer Open.
  27. Francis, B., Mills, M., ve Lupton, R. (2017). Towards social justice in education: Contradictions and dilemmas. Journal of Education Policy, 32(4), 414-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1276218
  28. Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. SAGE.
  29. Glynn,C., Wesely, P., ve Wassell, B. (2014). Words and actions: Teaching languages through the lens of social justice. ACTFL.
  30. Gutiérrez, A., Tyner, K. (2012). Media education, media literacy and digital competence. Scientific Journal of Media Education, 38(19), 31-39.
  31. Günday, R., ve Tahtalı Çamlıoğlu, Y. (2015). Yabancı dil ve gramer öğretiminde dijital medyayı kullanma. Turkish Studies, 10(15), 471-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9073
  32. Harmandaoğlu Baz, E., Cephe, P. T., ve Balçıkanlı, C. (2019). Understanding EFL pre-service teachers’ behavioral intentions to use cloud applications. E-Learning and Digital Media, 16(3), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019834958
  33. Hartley, J. (2009). The uses of digital literacy. Creative economy + innovation culture. University of Queensland Press.
  34. Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. The Aspen Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED523244.pdf
  35. Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., ve Yang, J. (2021). What to teach? Strategies for developing digital competency in preservice teacher training. Computers & Education, 165, 104149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104149
  36. Hawkings, M. R. (2011). Social justice language teacher education. Multilingual Matters. International Reading Association. (2009). New literacies and 21st-century technologies. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/new-literacies-21st-century-position-statement.pdf?sfvrsn=6
  37. Jensen, S. C. (2011). Introduction: Media, democracy, human rights, and social justice. S. C. Jansen, J. Pooley, ve L. Taub-Pervizpour (Ed.), Media and social justice (ss. 1-26). Palgrave.
  38. Kara, M., Caner, S., Günay Gökben, A., Cengiz, C., İşgör Şimşek, E., ve Yıldırım, S. (2018). Validation of an instrument for preservice teachers and an investigation of their new media literacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(7), 1005-1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117731380
  39. Karaduman, S. (2019). Yeni medya okuryazarlığı: Yeni beceriler/olanaklar/riskler. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 6(1), 683-700. https://doi.org/10.17680/erciyesiletisim.484193
  40. Kellner, D. (2000). New technologies/new literacies: Reconstructing education for the new millennium. Teaching Education, 11(3), 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698975
  41. Koç, M., ve Barut, E. (2016). Development and validation of new media literacy scale (NMLS) for university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(1), 834-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.035
  42. Kraidy, U. (2002). Digital media and education: Cognitive impact of information visualization. Journal of Educational Media, 27(3), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165020270302
  43. Krumsvik, R. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education & Information Technologies, 13(4), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-008-9069-5
  44. Lieberman, D. A., Bates, C. H., ve So, J. (2009). Young children’s learning with digital media. Computers in the Schools, 26(1), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560903360194
  45. Lin, T. B., Li, J. Y., Deng, F., ve Lee, L. (2013). Understanding new media literacy: An explorative theoretical framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 160-170. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/131568/
  46. McDonald, M., ve Zeichner, K. (2009). Social justice teacher education. W. Ayers, T. C. Quinn, ve D. Stovall (Ed.), Handbook on social justice in education (ss. 595-610). Routledge.
  47. McGee, L., ve Richgels, D. (2006). Can technology support emergent reading and writing? Directions for the future. M. McKenna, L. Labbo, R. Kieffer, ve D. Reinking (Ed.), International handbook of literacy and technology II (ss. 369-377). Erlbaum.
  48. Miller, M. J., Sendrowitz, K., Connacher, C., Blanco, S., de La Pena, C. M., Bernardi, S., ve Morere, L. (2009). College students’ social justice interest and commitment: A social-cognitive perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(4), 495-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017220
  49. Mills, C. (2012). When ‘picking the right people’ is not enough: A Bourdieuian analysis of social justice and dispositional change in pre-service teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.001
  50. Mishra, P., ve Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  51. Nabhan, S. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions and competences on digital literacy in an EFL academic writing setting. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34628
  52. Nganga, L. (2019). Preservice teachers perceptions of teaching for global mindedness and social justice: Using the 4Cs (Collaboration, Critical thinking, Creativity and Communication) in teacher education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 26-57. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v20i11.3770
  53. Nieto, S. (2010). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives. Routledge.
  54. OECD. (2016). Skills for a digital world: 2016 ministerial meeting on the digital economy. Background report. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 250. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwz83z3wnw-en
  55. Ofcom (Office of Communications). (2004). Strategies and priorities for the promotion of media literacy: A statement. Ofcom.
  56. Ofcom (Office of Communications). (2021). Adults’ media use and attitudes report. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/217834/adults-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2020-21.pdf
  57. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS: Survival manual (6. baskı). McGraw Hill Education.
  58. Pantić, N., ve Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry, 6(3), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.27311
  59. Plowman, L., Stephen, C., ve McPake, J. (2010). Supporting young children's learning with technology at home and in preschool. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 93-113. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02671520802584061
  60. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  61. Price-Dennis, D., ve Carrion, S. (2017). Leveraging digital literacies for equity and social justice. Language Arts, 94(3), 190-195. http://sites.bu.edu/summerliteracyinstitute/files/2017/05/Leveraging.Digital.Literacies.pdf
  62. Rafferty, J. ve Steyaert, J. (2007). Social work in a digital society. M. Lymbery ve K. Postle (Ed.), Social work: A companion to learning (ss. 165-175). SAGE.
  63. Ramadhan, S., Indriyani, V., ve Sukma, E. (2019). Teacher competence in utilizing digital media literacy in education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1339(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012111
  64. Ranieri, M., Bruni, I. ve de Xivry, A. (2018). Teachers’ Professional Development on Digital and Media Literacy. Findings and recommendations from a European project. Research on Education and Media,9(2), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2017-0009
  65. Rayburn, D. (2012). Streaming and digital media: understanding the business and technology. CRC Press.
  66. Roeser, R. W., Skinner, E., Beers, J., ve Jennings, P. A., (2012). Mindfulness training and teachers’ professional development: An emerging area of research and practice. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00238.x
  67. Satır, M. E. (2020). Dijitalleşen biyolojik yurttaşlık: Change.org örneği. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.552119
  68. Segers, E., ve Verhoeven, L. (2002). Multimedia support of early literacy learning. Computers & Education, 39(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00034-9
  69. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  70. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  71. Smith, R. (2013). What is digital media? https://thecdm.ca/news/what-is-digital-media
  72. Sukri, H. I. M., Mustapha, L., Othman, M., Aralas, D., ve Ismail, L. (2018). Social media: Engaging language learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 287-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5013
  73. Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
  74. Torres-Harding, S. R., Steele, C., Schulz, E., Taha, F., ve Pico, C. (2014). Student perceptions of social justice and social justice activities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 9(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197914520655
  75. Tschannen-Moran, M., ve Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 751-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.005
  76. Ugurhan, Y. Z. C., Kumtepe, E. G., Kumtepe, A. T., ve Saykılı, A. (2020). From media literacy to new media literacy: A lens into open and distance learning context. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21 (Special Issue-IODL), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770953
  77. Verdugo, D., ve Belmonte, I. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 87-101. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44090
  78. Villegas, A. M. (2007). Dispositions in teacher education: A look at social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487107308419
  79. Zajda, J., Majhanovich, S., ve Rust, V. (2006). Introduction: Education and social justice. International Review of Education, 52(1-2), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-005-5614-2
  80. Zeichner, K. M. (2009). Teacher education and the struggle for social justice. Routledge.
  81. Zeichner, K. M. (2011). Teacher education for social justice. M. R. Hawkins (Ed.), Social justice language teacher education (ss. 7-22). Multilingual Matters.