Dergiler / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 1

Attitudes Towards Income Inequality in Turkey

Sayfa
219–236
Yayın Tarihi
2019-02-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this context, it can be said that there is a strong connection between the concepts of religion, ideology, and justice which is mentioned together with the idea of inequality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz The purpose ofthis paperisto revealfactorsthat affect attitudestowardsincome inequality in Turkey by using World Values Surveys dataset over the period 1990-2011.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Two separate estimations have been run using different explanatory variables.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this context, it can be said that there is a strong connection between the concepts of religion, ideology, and justice which is mentioned together with the idea of inequality.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Attitudes · Income inequality · Logistic regression

Özet

Öz The purpose ofthis paperisto revealfactorsthat affect attitudestowardsincome inequality in Turkey by using World Values Surveys dataset over the period 1990-2011. Unlike previous studies on Turkey, this paper has employed ordered logistic regression with the wider period. Two separate estimations have been run using different explanatory variables. In the first estimation, findings have demonstrated that financial satisfaction of households, religion and political ideologyare crucial factors in the attitude creation process. In the second estimation, trust variables have been run with traditional control variables such as sex, age, education, and marital status. People who trust armed forces, police, European Union, and government support larger income differences almost in all years. Individuals who trust labour unions prefer more equality as expected. Findings reveal that ideologies and religious affiliations of voters are determinative in the development of policies to combat income inequality, among other factors mentioned. In this context, it can be said that there is a strong connection between the concepts of religion, ideology, and justice which is mentioned together with the idea of inequality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LİMANLI, Ö. (2019). Attitudes Towards Income Inequality in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 1, 219–236. https://ajindex.com/articles/10085

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Alesina, A. and G.-M. Angeletos (2005), “Fairness and redistribution”, American Economic Review 95 (4), 960–980.
  2. Alesina, A. and N. Fuchs-Schu¨ndeln (2007), “Goodbye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people”, American Economic Review 97 (4), 1507–1528.
  3. Alesina, A. and E. Glaeser (2005), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe - A World of Difference. The Rodolfo De Benedetti Lecture Series. Oxford University Press.
  4. Alesina, A. and E. La Ferrara (2005), “Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities”, Journal of Public Economics 89 (5–6), 897–931.
  5. Alesina, A. and D. Rodrik (1994), “Distributive politics and economic growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (2), 465–490.
  6. Alesina, A., B. Sacerdote, and E. Glaeser (2001), “Why doesn’t the United States have a Europeanstyle welfare state?”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2). Alesina, A. F. and P. Giuliano (2009), “Preferences for redistribution”, Working Paper 14825, National Bureau of Economic Research. Arıkan, G. (2013), “Values, religiosity and support for redistribution and social policy in Turkey”, Turkish Studies 14 (1), 34–52.
  7. Benabou, R. and E. A. Ok (2001), “Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2), 447–487. B´enabou, R. and J. Tirole (2006), “Belief in a just world and redistributive politics”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2), 699–746.
  8. Clark, A. E. and C. D’Ambrosio (2015), “Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence”, A. B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution, Volume 2, pp. 1147–1208.
  9. Elsevier. Corneo, G. and H. P. Gru¨ner (2002), “Individual preferences for political redistribution”, Journal of Public Economics 83 (1), 83–107.
  10. Costa-Font, J. and F. Cowell (2015), “Social identity and redistributive preferences: A survey”, Journal of Economic Surveys 29 (2), 357–374.
  11. Dahlberg, M., K. Edmark, and H. Lundqvist (2012), “Ethnic diversity and preferences for redistribution”, Journal of Political Economy 120 (1), 41–76.
  12. Fehr, E. and K. M. Schmidt (1999), “A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3), 817–868.
  13. Fong, C. (2001), “Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution”, Journal of Public Economics 82 (2), 225–246.
  14. Fullerton, A. S. and J. Xu (2016), Ordered Regression Models – Parallel, Partial, and Non-Parallel Alternatives, CRC Press. Garc´ıa-Valin˜as, M.