KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 81 Sayı: 3

IKBY–Körfez İlişkileri: Mikro-Bölgesel Paradiplomasi ve Bölgesel Alt-Sistem İşbirliği

The KRG-Gulf Relations: Regional-Subsystem Collaboration in an Emerging Micro-Regional Paradiplomacy

Betul Dogan Akkas(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SİYASAL BİLGİLER FAKÜLTESİ, ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER BÖLÜMÜ, ULUSLARARASI SİYASET ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-6933-8139
Sayfa
601–620
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-14
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu çerçevede ortaya çıkan rol anlayışları, zaman zaman rol çatışmalarına yol açma potansiyeli taşısa da, IKBY ve Körfez devletlerinin Orta Doğu’daki aktörlük kapasitelerini güçlendirmelerine ve bölgesel siyasette daha görünür roller üstlenmelerine imkân sağlayabilecek yeni rol uyarlamalarını teşvik etmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Makale, Irak Kürdistan Bölgesel Yönetimi (IKBY) ile Körfez devletleri arasındaki ilişkileri inceleyerek, dış politika analizi literatürüne katkı sunmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çalışma temel olarak, IKBY ve Körfez devletlerinin ittifaklarını Orta Doğu siyasetinin bölgesel paradigmalarında nasıl şekillendirdiklerini tartışmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu çerçevede ortaya çıkan rol anlayışları, zaman zaman rol çatışmalarına yol açma potansiyeli taşısa da, IKBY ve Körfez devletlerinin Orta Doğu’daki aktörlük kapasitelerini güçlendirmelerine ve bölgesel siyasette daha görünür roller üstlenmelerine imkân sağlayabilecek yeni rol uyarlamalarını teşvik etmektedir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Rol teori · Paradiplomasi · Körfez devletleri

Özet

Makale, Irak Kürdistan Bölgesel Yönetimi (IKBY) ile Körfez devletleri arasındaki ilişkileri inceleyerek, dış politika analizi literatürüne katkı sunmaktadır. Özellikle Suudi Arabistan, Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri (BAE) ve Katar’ın IKBY ile gelişen ilişkileri çalışmanın odak noktasıdır. Çalışma temel olarak, IKBY ve Körfez devletlerinin ittifaklarını Orta Doğu siyasetinin bölgesel paradigmalarında nasıl şekillendirdiklerini tartışmaktadır. Araştırma kavramsal olarak bu ilişkileri bir alt-devlet aktörü ile bölgesel güç arasında gelişen mikro-bölgesel paradiplomasi olarak tanımlamaktadır. Makale, rol teorinin sunduğu kavramsal çerçeveden hareketle, Körfez devletleri ile IKBY arasında gelişen ilişkilerin, IKBY’nin benimsediği “bölgesel alt-sistem işbirlikçisi” rol anlayışı etrafında şekillenen bir mikrobölgesel paradiplomasi örneği oluşturduğunu ilerisürmektedir. Bu çerçevede ortaya çıkan rol anlayışları, zaman zaman rol çatışmalarına yol açma potansiyeli taşısa da, IKBY ve Körfez devletlerinin Orta Doğu’daki aktörlük kapasitelerini güçlendirmelerine ve bölgesel siyasette daha görünür roller üstlenmelerine imkân sağlayabilecek yeni rol uyarlamalarını teşvik etmektedir.

Abstract

This paper contributes the foreign policy analysis research elaborating the relations between the Kurdistan Regional Government (the KRG) and the Gulf states. Notably, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Qatar have rising relations with the KRG. . A primary question is central to this analysis: How do these actors (the KRG and Gulf states) propose their alliances amid the bigger picture of Middle East affairs? As an answer to this inquiry, the research defines this diplomatic endeavour among a sub-state actor and other regional powers as micro-regional paradiplomacy. These actors are part of an emerging micro-regional paradiplomacy with the KRG’s role conception of regional-subsystem collaborator. The emerging role conceptions can bring further role adaptations for the KRG and the Gulf states to strengthen their actorness in the Middle East, despite potential role contestations

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akkas, B. D. (2026). IKBY–Körfez İlişkileri: Mikro-Bölgesel Paradiplomasi ve Bölgesel Alt-Sistem İşbirliği. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 81 Sayı: 3, 601–620. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.1974891

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (54)

  1. Ababakr, Y. M. (2020). Iraqi Kurdistan Region: From paradiplomacy to protodiplomacy. Review of Economics and Political Science, 8(4), 309–328.
  2. Aguirre, I. (1999). Making sense of paradiplomacy? An intertextual enquiry about a concept in search of a definition. Regional & Federal Studies, 9(1), 185–209.
  3. Akbaba, Y., Özdamar, Ö., & James, P. (2019). Role theory in the Middle East and North Africa: Politics, economics and identity. Routledge.
  4. Anadolu Agency. (2026, March 5). Iraqi Kurdish leader says Kurdistan Regional Government will not be part of regional conflicts. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/iraqi-kurdish-leader-says-kurdistan-regional-government-will-not-be-part-of-regional-conflicts/3850702
  5. Battaloglu, N. H. (2021). Ideational factors in Turkey's alignment with Qatar and their impact on regional security. The International Spectator, 56(4), 101–118.
  6. Bechocha, J. (2024). Dana Gas reports $160 million in preliminary 2023 profit. Rudaw. https://www.rudaw.net/english/business/08022024
  7. Breuning, M. (2017). Role theory in foreign policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.334
  8. Cantir, C. (2020). Kin states in sub-state diplomacy conflict dynamics. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(1), 59–77. Cantir, C., & Kaarbo, J. (2016). Unpacking ego in role theory: Vertical and horizontal role contestation and foreign policy. In C. Cantir & J. Kaarbo (Eds.), Domestic role contestation, foreign policy, and international relations. Routledge.
  9. Cantir, C., & Kaarbo, J. (2016). Unpacking ego in role theory: Vertical and horizontal role contestation and foreign policy. In C. Cantir & J. Kaarbo (Eds.), Domestic role contestation, foreign policy, and international relations. Routledge.
  10. Cengiz, S. (2022). Dynamics of Saudi Arabia–KRG relations: From 2003 Iraq War to 2017 referendum and beyond. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 9(3), 321–340.
  11. Charountaki, M. (2015). Kurdish policies in Syria under the Arab Uprisings: A revisiting of IR in the new Middle Eastern order. Third World Quarterly, 36(2), 337–356.
  12. Charountaki, M. (2016). The GCC in Kurdish politics. Journal of Arabian Studies, 6(2), 201–215.
  13. Cornago, N. (2018). Paradiplomacy and protodiplomacy. In G. Martel (Ed.), The encyclopedia of diplomacy. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0211
  14. Cuhadar, E., Kaarbo, J., Kesgin, B., & Ozkececi-Taner, B. (2017). Personality or role? Comparisons of Turkish leaders across different institutional positions. Political Psychology, 38(1), 39–54.
  15. Dal, E. P., & Erşen, E. (2014). Reassessing the "Turkish model" in the post-Cold War era: A role theory perspective. Turkish Studies, 15(2), 258–282.
  16. Dogan-Akkas, B. (2024). Bahraini-Turkish relations. Insight Turkey, 26(2), 205–228.
  17. Dogan-Akkas, B. (2024). Turkey-Kuwait ties grow amid regional balancing. Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. https://agsiw.org/turkey-kuwait-ties-grow-amid-regional-balancing/
  18. Duchacek, I. D. (1990). Perforated sovereignties: Towards a typology of new actors in international relations. In H. J. Michelmann & P. Soldatos (Eds.), Federalism and international relations: The role of subnational units. Clarendon Press.
  19. Ghafuri, L. (2020). Qatar aims to increase trade, bilateral relations with the Kurdistan Region. Rudaw. https://www.rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/15012020
  20. Gulmohamad, Z. (2022). The making of foreign policy in Iraq: Political factions and the ruling elite. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  21. Harnisch, S., Frank, C., & Maull, H. W. (Eds.). (2011). Role theory in international relations: Approaches and analyses. Routledge.
  22. Hearst, D. (2017). How Saudi tried to use the Kurds to clip Iran's wings. Middle East Eye. https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/how-saudi-tried-use-kurds-clip-irans-wings
  23. Holsti, K. J. (1970). National role conceptions in the study of foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013584
  24. IEDJA (2005). Constitution of the Republic of Iraq. National Investment Commission. https://investpromo.gov.iq/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/iraqi-constitution-En.pdf
  25. Invest Kurdistan. (n.d.). Kurdistan and the UAE embark on a journey of mutual growth and prosperity. https://invest.gov.krd/news-and-events/kurdistan-and-the-uae-embark-on-a-journey-of-mutual-growth-and-prosperity/
  26. Kara, M., & Sözen, A. (2016). Change and continuity in Turkish foreign policy: Evaluating pre-AKP and AKP periods' national role conceptions. Uluslararası İlişkiler, 13(52), 47–66.
  27. Kurdistan Chronicle. (2026). Masrour Barzani condemns attacks on UAE, reaffirms support for peace and stability. https://kurdistanchronicle.com/babat/4614
  28. Kurdistan Regional Government. (2026). Prime Minister and King of Bahrain discuss regional tensions. https://gov.krd/english/government/the-prime-minister/activities/posts/2026/ march/prime-minister-and-king-of-bahrain-discuss-regional-tensions/
  29. Kurdistan24 Digital Media. (2024). KRG provides Qatari investors with any facilities needed: PM Barzani. Kurdistan24. https://www.kurdistan24.net/en/story/35102-KRG-provides-Qatari-investors-with-any-facilities-needed:-PM-Barzani
  30. Kurdistan24. (2026). Saudi Arabia condemns attacks on Kurdistan Region leaders, reaffirms support for Iraq's stability. https://www.kurdistan24.net/en/story/904176/saudi-arabia-condemns-attacks-on-kurdistan-region-leaders-reaffirms-support-for-iraqs-stability
  31. Laclau, E. (2012). Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. Verso.
  32. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso. McMillan, S. L. (2008). Subnational foreign policy actors: How and why governors participate in US foreign policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 4(3), 227–253.
  33. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the State of Qatar. (2026). Qatar strongly condemns Iranian attack on Iraq's Kurdistan Region. https://mofa.gov.qa/en/latest-articles/statements/qatar-strongly-condemns-iranian-attack-on-iraq-s-kurdistan-region
  34. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates. (2026, July 17). UAE condemns Iranian attack on Iraq's Kurdistan Region. https://www.mofa.gov.ae/en/MediaHub/News/2026/7/17/UAE-Iraq
  35. MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the State of Qatar). 2017, September 26). Qatar voices concern over Iraqi Kurdistan referendum. https://mofa.gov.qa/en/qatar/latest-articles/latest-news/details/2017/09/26/qatar-voices-concern-over-iraqi-kurdistan-referendum
  36. Nabers, D. (2011). Identity and role change in international politics. In S. Harnisch, C. Frank, & H. W. Maull (Eds.), Role theory in international relations (pp. 90–108). Routledge.
  37. O'Driscoll, D., & Baser, B. (2019). Independence referendums and nationalist rhetoric: The Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Third World Quarterly, 40(11), 2016–2034.
  38. Özdamar, Ö. (2016). Domestic sources of changing Turkish foreign policy toward the MENA during the 2010s: A role theoretic approach. In Domestic role contestation, foreign policy, and international relations (pp. 89–104). Routledge.
  39. Özdamar, Ö., & Canbolat, S. (2023). Leaders in the Middle East and North Africa: How ideology shapes foreign policy. Cambridge University Press.
  40. Palani, K. (2022). Kurdistan's de facto statehood: A new explanatory framework. Routledge.
  41. Palani, K., Khidir, J., Dechesne, M., & Bakker, E. (2019). The development of Kurdistan's de facto statehood: Kurdistan's September 2017 referendum for independence. Third World Quarterly, 40(12), 2270–2288.
  42. Palani, K., Khidir, J., Dechesne, M., & Bakker, E. (2021). De facto states' engagement with parent states: Kurdistan's engagement with the Iraqi government. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 48(4), 770–788.
  43. Paquin, S., & LaChapelle, G. (Eds.). (2005). Mastering globalization: New sub-states' governance and strategies. Routledge.
  44. Partrick, N. (2016). Saudi Arabian foreign policy: Conflict and cooperation. I.B. Tauris.
  45. Pearlman, W., & Cunningham, K. G. (2011). Non-state actors, fragmentation, and conflict processes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(1), 3–15.
  46. Plebani, A., & Al Ubaydli, O. (2014). GCC relations with post-war Iraq: A strategic perspective. Gulf Research Centre Cambridge.
  47. Qatar Chamber. (2024, September 10). Qatar Chamber, Invest Kurdistan Authority discuss cooperation relations. https://www.qatarchamber.com/qcci-invest-kurdistan-authority/ Rasheed, A. (2018). The KRG–Baghdad relations from the First Republic to the Second Republic (1991–2017). In F. A. Jabar & R. Mansour (Eds.), Iraq after ISIS (pp. 63–84). Palgrave Macmillan.
  48. Rudaw. (2026). Iranian official compares UAE to Kurdistan Region amid regional tensions. https://www.rudaw.net/english/categories/middleeast/956930
  49. Saeed, Y. (2023, October 3). Budding Kurdish-UAE relations. Arab Gulf States Institute. https://agsi.org/analysis/budding-kurdish-uae-relations/
  50. Schiavon, J. A. (2019). Comparative paradiplomacy. Routledge.
  51. Soldatos, P. (1990). An explanatory framework for the study of federated states as foreign-policy actors. In H. J. Michelmann & P. Soldatos (Eds.), Federalism and international relations: The role of subnational units (pp. 34–53). Clarendon Press
  52. Walker, S. G. (Ed.). (1987). Role theory and foreign policy analysis. Duke University Press.
  53. Wright, S. (2011). Foreign policy in the GCC states. In M. Kamrava (Ed.), The international politics of the Persian Gulf (pp. 72–93). Syracuse University Press.
  54. Zulal, S. (2012). Survival Strategies and Diplomatic Tools: The Kurdistan Region’s Foreign Policy Outlook.