KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Rouya Türkiyyah / 2026 / Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3

العلاقات التركية البحرينية: تكييف الدور الإستراتيجي للمنامة

Bahraini-Turkish Relations: A Strategic Role Adaptation of Manama

Betul Dogan Akkas(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6933-8139
Sayfa
69–98
Yayın Tarihi
2024-09-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These roles are either played simultaneously, as is the case in the peak years of cooperation with Türkiye, or being a faithful ally of Saudi Arabia dominates Bahrain’s strategic role adaptations, notably in the times of crises.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose this research is to answer two questions: What are the major national role types that Bahrain accommodates in the contemporary Middle East system in conducting foreign policymaking towards Türkiye?
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:With a hybrid use of post-structural discourse theory and role theory the nature of the emerging ties is elaborated, focusing on the Bahraini foreign affairs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These roles are either played simultaneously, as is the case in the peak years of cooperation with Türkiye, or being a faithful ally of Saudi Arabia dominates Bahrain’s strategic role adaptations, notably in the times of crises.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:البحرين · تركيا · سياسة الخليج

Abstract

The purpose this research is to answer two questions: What are the major national role types that Bahrain accommodates in the contemporary Middle East system in conducting foreign policymaking towards Türkiye? How does Bahrain’s role conceptions towards Türkiye work under a sub-regional Saudi hegemony? There has been continuous, solid, yet limited diplomatic communication between Bahrain and Türkiye. With a hybrid use of post-structural discourse theory and role theory the nature of the emerging ties is elaborated, focusing on the Bahraini foreign affairs. This research proposes that there are two dynamics in the Bahraini foreign policymaking towards Türkiye: a faithful ally of Saudi Arabia and strategic role adaptation. These roles are either played simultaneously, as is the case in the peak years of cooperation with Türkiye, or being a faithful ally of Saudi Arabia dominates Bahrain’s strategic role adaptations, notably in the times of crises.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akkas, B. D. (2024). العلاقات التركية البحرينية: تكييف الدور الإستراتيجي للمنامة. Rouya Türkiyyah, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 69–98. https://doi.org/10.36360/1560-013-003-004

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. “UK Opens Permanent Military Base in Bahrain,” Reuters, (April 5, 2018), retrieved May 4, 2024, from https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1HC2NQ/; “Population and Demographics,” Ministry of Information, retrieved May 5, 2024, from https://www.mia.gov.bh/kingdom-of-bahrain/population-and-demographics/?lang=en.
  2. Nawal Aljasim, “Bahreyn–Türkiye İlişkileri: Gelişim, Günün Koşulları ve Gelecekteki Beklentiler,” Master’s thesis, Gazi University, 2019; Aydın Erdogan and Ali Serman Merdan “Türkiye’nin Körfez Açılımında Bahreyn,” Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2021), pp. 441-465.
  3. Nesibe Hicret Battaloglu “Ideational Factors in Turkey’s Alignment with Qatar and Their Impact on Regional Security,” The International Spectator, Vol. 56, No. 4 (2021), pp.101-118; Sean Yom, “Roles, Identity, and Security: Foreign Policy Contestation in Monarchical Kuwait,” European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2020), pp. 569-593; Fatima al-Karbi. “The United Arab Emirates Foreign Policy Change in the Post 2011 Middle East: A Role Theory Approach,” Doctoral dissertation, Durham University, 2022.
  4. Sebastian Harnisch, “Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts,” in Sebastian Harnisch, Cornelia Frank, and Hanns W. Maull (eds.), Role Theory in International Relations, (Oxon: Routledge, 2011), pp. 7-15.
  5. Harnisch, “Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts,” p. 10.
  6. Quoted in Dirk Nabers “Identity and Role Change in International Politics,” in Sebastian Harnisch, Cornelia Frank, and Hanns W. Maull (eds.), Role Theory in International Relations, (Oxon: Routledge, 2011), p. 82.
  7. Ernesto Laclau, “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony,” in Chantal Mouffe, Simon Critchley, Jacques Derrida, Ernesto Laclau, and Richard Rorty (eds.), Deconstruction and Pragmatism, (Routledge, 1996), pp. 49-70; Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Vol. 8, (Verso, 2014); Dirk Nabers, A Poststructuralist Discourse Theory of Global Politics, (Springer, 2015); Dirk Nabers, “Power, Leadership, and Hegemony in International Politics: The Case of East Asia,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, (2010), pp. 931-949; David Howarth, Aletta J. Norval, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, (Manchester University Press, 2000).
  8. Betül Doğan-Akkaş, “Hegemonic Practices in the GCC Political Complex (GPC): Evolvement of Counter-Hegemonic Formations,” Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Durham University, 2023.
  9. Nabers, “Power, Leadership, and Hegemony in International Politics,” p. 934; Marijke Breuning, “Role Theory,” in Patrick A. Mello and Falk Ostermann (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Foreign Policy Analysis Methods, (Routledge, 2022), p. 194.
  10. Zekeriya Kurşun, “Osmanlı Devleti’nin Basra Körfezi Siyaseti: Bağdat, Basra ve Lahsa Beylerbeylikleri (1534-1672),” FSM İlmi Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 12, (2018), p. 20.
  11. Salih Özbaran, “Bahrain in 1559: A Narrative of Turco-Portuguese Conflict in the Gulf,” Osmanlı Araştırmaları, Vol. 3, No. 3 (1982), pp. 90-104.
  12. Salih Özbaran, “16. Yüzyılda Basra Körfezi Sahillerinde Osmanlılar: Basra Beylerbeyliğinin Kuruluşu,” Tarih Dergisi, Vol. 25, (2011), pp. 51-72.
  13. Kursun, “Osmanlı Devleti’nin Basra Körfezi Siyaseti,” p. 13.
  14. Kurşun, “Osmanlı Devleti’nin Basra Körfezi Siyaseti,” p. 20.
  15. Kurşun, “Osmanlı Devleti’nin Basra Körfezi Siyaseti,” p. 11. Zekeriya Kurşun, Katar’da Osmanlılar 1871-1916: Basra Körferzi’nde Osmanlı-İngiliz Çekişmesi, (Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 2004), p. 25.
  16. Kurşun, Katar’da Osmanlılar 1871-1916, p. 28
  17. Oktay Kızılkaya, “XIX. Yüzyılın Sonu XX. Yüzyılın Başlarında Basra Körfezinde Uluslararası Hakimiyet Mücadelesi,” Electronic Turkish Studies, Vol. 8, No. 7 (2013), p. 297.
  18. Kurşun, Katar’da Osmanlılar 1871-1916, p. 37.
  19. Zekeriya Kurşun, “Basra Körfezi’nde Bir Arap Aşireti: Acman Urbanı (1820-1913),” Belleten, Vol. 63, No. 236 (1999) p. 131.
  20. Kurşun, Katar’da Osmanlılar 1871-1916, p. 180.
  21. Kurşun, Katar'da Osmanlılar 1871-1916, p. 179.
  22. Kurşun, Katar'da Osmanlılar 1871-1916: Basra körferzi'nde Osmanlı-İngiliz çekişmesi, p. 146.
  23. Rouya Turkiyyah, vol. 12, no. 2, 2023. https://rouyaturkiyyah.com/
  24. Aljasim, “Bahreyn-Türkiye İlişkileri,” p. 44.
  25. Sam Pope Brewer, “U.N. Told Bahrain Seeks to Be Free,” The New York Times, (May 3, 1970), retrieved May 5, 2024, from https://www.nytimes.com/1970/05/03/archives/un-told-bahrain-seeks-to-be-free-council-to-consider-report-on.html.
  26. “Question of Bahrain Initial Proceedings,” UN, (January 1970), retrieved from https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sites/www.un.org.securitycouncil/files/en/sc/repertoire/69-71/Chapter%208/69-71_08-10-Question%20of%20Bahrain.pdf; Edward Gordon, “Resolution of the Bahrain Dispute,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 65, No. 3 (1971), pp. 560-568.
  27. “Bilateral Political Relations between Türkiye and Bahrain,” MFA, retrieved May 4, 2024, from https://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-between-turkiye-and-bahrain.en.mfa.
  28. Aljasim, “Bahreyn-Türkiye İlişkileri,” p. 75.