Journals / European Journal of Educational Research / 2018 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Exploring Prospective Teachers’ Reflections in the Context of Conducting Clinical Interviews

Pages
349–358
Publication Date
2018-04-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There are implications for both teacher learning and research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated prospective mathematics teachers’ reflections on the experience of designing and conducting one-to-one clinical interviews with middle school students in the context of an elective course on use of video in teacher learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Prospective teachers were asked to write about weaknesses and strengths in student understanding as well as their own performance as an interviewer in terms of asking questions and responding to student thinking in their reflections on conducting clinical interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There are implications for both teacher learning and research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Prospective mathematics teachers · reflection skills · clinical interview

Abstract

This study investigated prospective mathematics teachers’ reflections on the experience of designing and conducting one-to-one clinical interviews with middle school students in the context of an elective course on use of video in teacher learning. Prospective teachers were asked to write about weaknesses and strengths in student understanding as well as their own performance as an interviewer in terms of asking questions and responding to student thinking in their reflections on conducting clinical interviews. Furthermore, prospective teachers were also asked to reflect on what they would do differently in order to conduct better clinical interviews. Nature of prospective teachers’ reflections were analyzed by using existing frameworks (through constructs of reflection-on-action and reflection-for-action) and by using thematic analysis. Results of data analyses revealed that prospective teachers had more difficulties in providing meaningful reflection-for-action which was related to alternative decisions and planning for future similar interviews. Thematic analysis results revealed prospective teachers’ learning were grouped under three categories: conducting clinical interviews as part of being a teacher, complexity of conducting clinical interviews, and personal theories about middle school students. There are implications for both teacher learning and research.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAYLAN, R. D. (2018). Exploring Prospective Teachers’ Reflections in the Context of Conducting Clinical Interviews. European Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 349–358. https://ajindex.com/articles/987273

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Cengiz, N., Kline, K., & Grant, T. (2011). Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(5), 1–20.
  2. Crespo, S. & Nicol, C. (2003). Learning to investigate students’ mathematical thinking: The role of student interviews, Proceedings of PME-27, Vol. 2, 261-267,
  3. Honolulu, U. S. A. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge. Davis, E.A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281-301.
  4. Farrell, T.S. (2013). Reflecting on ESL teacher expertise: A case study. System, 41 (4), 1070-1082.
  5. Franke, M., Webb, N. M., Chan, A.G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (4), 380-392.
  6. Gelfuso, A., & Dennis, D. (2014). Getting reflection off the page: The challenges of developing support structures for pre-service teacher reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 1-11.
  7. Ginsburg, H. (1997). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Ginsburg, H. P., Cami, A. E., & Preston, M. D. (2010). Inquiry practices: How can they be taught well? In N. Lyons (Ed.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry (pp. 453-472). New York: Springer. Ginsburg, H. P., Jacobs, S. F., & Lopez, L. S. (1998). The teacher's guide to flexible interviewing in the classroom: Learning what children know about math. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.
  9. Jacobs, V. R. & Empson, S. B. (2016). Responding to children’s mathematical thinking in the moment: an emerging framework of teaching moves. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 185-197.
  10. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., Philipp, R. A., & Schappelle, B. P. (2011). Deciding how to respond on the basis of children's understandings. In M. G. Sherin, V. R., Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 97–116). New York: Routledge. Jenkins, O. F. (2010). Developing teachers’ knowledge of students as learners of mathematics through structured interviews. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 141-154.
  11. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Profession