SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Exploring the Relationship and Labels Attached by Students: How Classroom Management Styles in a Philippine Higher Education Institution Prevail?

Gilbert C. MAGULOD JR.
Juvelyn D. CAPİLİ
Roselyn M. PİNON
Pages
893–904
Publication Date
2019-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implications of this study will serve as a reference to better prepare classroom managers of 21st-century college classrooms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper endeavors to ascertain the prevailing classroom management styles of instructors as well as the prevailing instructor-student relationship in a Philippine higher education institution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings showed that a great deal of authoritative classroom management style is being adhered by instructors while the students manifested a moderate level of connectedness and anxiety towards the classroom management styles of their instructors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implications of this study will serve as a reference to better prepare classroom managers of 21st-century college classrooms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Classroom management styles · student-teacher relationships · labels

Abstract

This paper endeavors to ascertain the prevailing classroom management styles of instructors as well as the prevailing instructor-student relationship in a Philippine higher education institution. It employed mixed methods of quantitative and qualitative methods of research to investigate the line of inquiry. A total of thirty faculty members and three-hundred students sampled from the population were the sources of data for the quantitative component of the study while eighteen students were selected as informants for the FGD to gather qualitative data. Findings showed that a great deal of authoritative classroom management style is being adhered by instructors while the students manifested a moderate level of connectedness and anxiety towards the classroom management styles of their instructors. Variables such as civil status, years of teaching experience, and level of educational attainment spelled differences on the classroom management styles instructors. It was uncovered that the different classroom management styles of instructors were attached with positive and negative labels and typifications. Implications of this study will serve as a reference to better prepare classroom managers of 21st-century college classrooms.

🔖

Cite This Article

JR., G. C. M., CAPİLİ, J. D., PİNON, R. M. (2019). Exploring the Relationship and Labels Attached by Students: How Classroom Management Styles in a Philippine Higher Education Institution Prevail?. European Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 893–904. https://ajindex.com/articles/987150

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Ahmad, S., Ch, A. H., Ayub, A., Zaheer, M., & Batool, A. (2017). Relationship of Classroom Management Strategies with Academic Performance of Students at College Level. Bulletin of Education & Research, 39(2), 239-249.
  2. Ali, Y. A., & Badah, A. M. (2014). Dominant management styles of the classrooms by the faculty members in alia university college. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(21), 176,183. Alkan, H. B. (2007). Ilkogretim ogretmenlerinin istenmeyen davranislarla bas etme yontemleri ve okulda siddet [The primary school teachers' methods to cope with misbehaviors and violence at schools] (Unpublished master’s thesis), University of Nigde, Nigde, Turkey. Andabai, P. W., & Basuo, B. K. (2013). Teacher’s personality and classroom management of tertiary institutions in Nigeria: The issues and perspectives. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(6), 113-118. doi: 10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n6p113 Antonechia, D. (1983). Classroom conflict management and secondary teacher, job satisfaction. Dissertation Abstract International, 44(11), 23-26.
  3. Bassey, B. A. (2012). A wider view of classroom management. Uyo, Nigeria: Ekong Publishing House. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664-678. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x Boynton, M., & Boynton, C. (2005). The educator's guide to preventing and solving discipline problems. Alexandra, VA: ASCD. Catt, S., Miller, D., & Schallenkamp, K. (2007). You are the key: Communicate for learning effectiveness. Education, 127(3), 369-377.
  4. Cakir, S. G. (2015). Authoritative approach and student empowerment among university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 151-154.
  5. Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143.
  6. Creasey, G., Jarvis, P., & Knapcik, E. (2009). A measure to assess student-instructor relationships. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030214
  7. Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities. British educational research journal, 32(4), 601-616. doi: 10.1080/01411920600775316 De Ocampo-Acero, V. C., Sanchez-Javier, E. J., & Ocampo-Castro, H. C. (2015). Principles of Teaching I. Metro Manila, Philippines: Rex Book Store Inc. De Wit, D. J., Karioja, K