SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Journal of Educational Research / 2019 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Evaluation of National Examination (UN) and National-Based School Examination (USBN) in Indonesia

Undang ROSİDİN
Herpratiwi HERPRATİWİ
Wayan SUANA
Rijal FİRDAOS
Pages
827–937
Publication Date
2019-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that (1) implementation of the UN and USBN, which has been ongoing, is in accordance with the standard operating procedure (SOP) that has been established by the board of national education standard (BNSP), (2) implementation of UN and USBN can be used to improve performance (3) the final examination system that is able to measure achievement of graduates' competency on certain subjects nationally by referring to the Graduate Competency Standard is computer-based national examination (UNBK).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to analyze (a) the suitability of National Examination (UN) and national-based school examination (USBN) implementation, which has been running on the current guidelines and efforts to improve students’ achievements, (b) the final examination system that is relevant in measuring student competency achievement based on graduate competence standard.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings indicate that (1) implementation of the UN and USBN, which has been ongoing, is in accordance with the standard operating procedure (SOP) that has been established by the board of national education standard (BNSP), (2) implementation of UN and USBN can be used to improve performance (3) the final examination system that is able to measure achievement of graduates' competency on certain subjects nationally by referring to the Graduate Competency Standard is computer-based national examination (UNBK).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The concluding remarks are an attempt to contribute to the growth of future research in the field of UN and USBN implementation in Indonesia.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Evaluation · National Examination (UN) · National-Based School Examination (UNBK)

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze (a) the suitability of National Examination (UN) and national-based school examination (USBN) implementation, which has been running on the current guidelines and efforts to improve students’ achievements, (b) the final examination system that is relevant in measuring student competency achievement based on graduate competence standard. It employed descriptive quantitative evaluation by using CIPP (context, input, process of implementation and product) evaluation model. Participants included the head of the Education and Culture Department, Ministry of Religion, Principals / Madrasas, teachers, and students. To collect the data, questionnaires, interviews, focus group discussions, and documentaries were undertaken. Additionally, the data analysis technique used quantitative and qualitative descriptive statistics. The findings indicate that (1) implementation of the UN and USBN, which has been ongoing, is in accordance with the standard operating procedure (SOP) that has been established by the board of national education standard (BNSP), (2) implementation of UN and USBN can be used to improve performance (3) the final examination system that is able to measure achievement of graduates' competency on certain subjects nationally by referring to the Graduate Competency Standard is computer-based national examination (UNBK). The concluding remarks are an attempt to contribute to the growth of future research in the field of UN and USBN implementation in Indonesia.

🔖

Cite This Article

ROSİDİN, U., HERPRATİWİ, H., SUANA, W., FİRDAOS, R. (2019). Evaluation of National Examination (UN) and National-Based School Examination (USBN) in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 827–937. https://ajindex.com/articles/987146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Arikunto, S. (2010). Basics of educational evaluation: In fundamentals of educational evaluation. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bumi Aksara. Atmanti, H. D. (2005). Investasi sumber daya manusia melalui pendidikan [Investment in human resources through education]. Dinamika Pembangunan, 3(1), 30-39.
  2. Barrows, J., Dunn, S., & Lylod, C. A. (2013). Anxiety, self-efficacy and college exam grades. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 204-208.
  3. Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc. Guilford, J. P. (1954).
  4. Psychometric methods. New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill. Hamied, F. A. (2010). EFL assessment in Indonesia: National exam and quality of education. In Y. Moon & B. Spolsky (Eds.), Language Assessment in Asia: Local, Regional or Global? (pp. 93-112). Asia TEFL Harmiyuni, & Sailan, M. (2018). Persepsi siswa tentang pelaksanaan ujian nasional berbasis komputer di SMK Komputer Mutiara Ilmu Makassar [Students' perceptions of the implementation of computer-based national examination in Vocational High School of Komputer Mutiara Ilmu in Makassar]. Jurnal Tomalebbi, 5(2), 36-42.
  5. Keeves, J. P., & Masters G. N. (1999). Advances in measurement in educational research and assessment. Tokyo, Japan: Pergamon. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Behavioral research: conceptual approach. New York, NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston. Koksel, M. S. (2009). Vocational high students’ sense of self-efficacy and test anxiety regarding biology learning. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(1), 57-67.
  6. Lunrasri, Y., & Gajaseni, C. (2014). Washback effects of the ordinary national educational test on English language learning as perceived by grade nine students. Online Journal of Education, 9(4), 226-240.
  7. Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan non tes [Techniques for preparing test and non-test instruments]. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Mitra Cendikia. Mardapi, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2009). Dampak ujian nasional [The impact of national examination]. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Retrieved from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/6-Dampak%20Ujian%20Nasional.pdf
  8. Nie, Y., Lau, S., & Liau, A. K. (2011). Role of academic self-efficacy in moderating the relation between task importance and test anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 736-741.
  9. Nunally, J. C. (1978).
  10. Pyschometric theory. New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill. Nur, L. T. (2014). Hubungan antara kestabilan emosi dan kepercayaan di