SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Education Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

THE STUDY OF VALIDITY AND RELIABİLİTY OF SELF REGULATED LEARNİNG STRATEGIES SCALE IN MATHEMATİCS

MATEMATİKTE ÖZ DÜZENLEYİCİ ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Sümer AKTAN
Erdogan TEZCİ
Pages
46–62
Publication Date
2013-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, self regulated learning starttegies scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument in evaluation of fifth grade students` self regulated learning strategies in mathematcs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to adapt sub scale of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich,1991) to Turkish in order to evaluate primary school students self regulated learning strategies in Mathematics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The scale was administrated to 273 students from 8 primary schools in Balikesir.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, self regulated learning starttegies scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument in evaluation of fifth grade students` self regulated learning strategies in mathematcs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:öz düzenleyici öğrenme stratejileri · matematikte öz düzenleyici öğrenme stratejileri · MSLQ ölçeği

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt sub scale of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Pintrich,1991) to Turkish in order to evaluate primary school students self regulated learning strategies in Mathematics. The scale was administrated to 273 students from 8 primary schools in Balikesir. Analysis was conducted 273 valid questionnaires. Results of confirmatory factor and reliability analysis show that self regulated learning strategies scale has eight factors. Internal consistency coefficient varied between .74-.91. Corrected item total correlations ranged from .32 to .82. On the other hand, factors of scale are to show that highest correlation between each other. Thus, self regulated learning starttegies scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument in evaluation of fifth grade students` self regulated learning strategies in mathematcs.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğrenmede motive edici stratejiler ölçeğinin alt boyutlarından biri olan öz düzenleyici öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğini ilkokul öğrencilerinin matematik dersinde kullandıkları öz düzenleyici öğrenme stratejilerini değerlendirmek amacıyla Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Ölçek Balıkesir de 8 ilkokulda öğrenim gören toplam 273 kişilik bir gruba uygulanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve güvenirlik çalışmasının sonuçları öz düzenleyici öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin sekiz faktörden oluştuğu, ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısının .74 ile .91 arasında değiştiğini göstermektedir. Madde toplam korelasyon değerleri ise .32 ile .82 arasındadır. Diğer taraftan ölçeği oluşturan maddeler birbirleriyle yüksek düzeyde korelasyon göstermektedir. elde edilen bu sonuçlara göre ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu söylenebilir. oluşturan

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAN, S., TEZCİ, E. (2013). THE STUDY OF VALIDITY AND RELIABİLİTY OF SELF REGULATED LEARNİNG STRATEGIES SCALE IN MATHEMATİCS. Education Sciences, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 46–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/985535

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Paris, S.G. and Paris, A.H., (2001). Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), pp: 89–101.
  2. Chung, M., (2000). The development of self-regulated learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1(1), pp: 55–66.
  3. Kornell, M. and Metcalfe, J., (2006). Study Efficacy and the Region of Proximal Learning Framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), pp: 609-622.
  4. McCaslin, M. and Hickey, D.T., (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 227-252).
  5. Erlbaum., Mahwah, NJ. Paterson, C.C., (1996). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement of senior biology.[Abstract] Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(2), pp: 48-52.
  6. Pintrich, P.R. ve De Groot, E.V., (1990). Motivational and selfregulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), pp: 33-40.
  7. Risemberg, R. and Zimmerman, B.J., (1992). Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15(2), pp: 98-101.
  8. Scruggs, T.E. and Mastropieri, M.A., (1988). Acquisition and transfer of learning strategies by gifted and nongifted students.[Abstract] Journal of Special Education, 22(2), pp: 153-1
  9. Wolters, C., Yu, S., and Pintrich, P., (1996). The relation between goal orientation and Student’s motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. [Abstract] Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), pp: 211-238.
  10. Zimmerman, B.J. and Martinez-Pons, M., (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23, pp: 614-28.
  11. Schunk, D. and Ertmer, P., (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation (pp:631–649). Academic Press.,San Diego. Pintrich, P.R., (2000). The role of goal orientation in selfregulated learning. In M. Boekaerts S, P.R. Pintrich ve M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation. Academic Press., San Diego, CA. Winne, P.H., (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self regulated learning and academic achievement. Theoretical perspectives (153-189).
  12. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., Mahwah, NJ. Zimmerman, B.J., (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A