Journals / Van Diş Hekimliği Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the Relationship Existing Periodontal Condition With Risk Factors of the Patients Visiting Periodontology Clinic

Periodontoloji Kliniğine Başvuran Hastalarının Mevcut Periodontal Durumlarının Risk Faktörleri ile İlişkisinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
1–11
Publication Date
2022-08-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, more epidemiological studies are needed in the future.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of our study was to determine the demographic data, periodontal condition (PC), various risk factors of patients who applied to the periodontology clinic, and to evaluate the relationship between PC with these factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 1758 patients (941 female/817 male), who applied to the periodontology clinic between 2016-2018 were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, more epidemiological studies are needed in the future.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Epidemiyoloji · periodontitis · risk faktörleri

Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine the demographic data, periodontal condition (PC), various risk factors of patients who applied to the periodontology clinic, and to evaluate the relationship between PC with these factors. In this study, 1758 patients (941 female/817 male), who applied to the periodontology clinic between 2016-2018 were included. Patients included in the study; demographic data (age, gender, educational status), PC, systemic disease, frequency of toothbrushing, dental flossing usage, visit to the dentist, and smoking were evaluated. All the data obtained were analyzed with the SPSS (ver.20) software. It was determined that 28.2% of the patients had healthy (clinical gingival health on an intact or a reduced periodontium), 46.4% had gingivitis, 22.6% had stage 1-2 and 2.8% had stage 3-4 periodontitis. 33.9% of the participants had never visited a dentist. While most of the participants (91.2%) did not use dental floss, the rate of those who toothbrushing twice aday was 71.7%. While 48% of smokers were gingivitis patients, 26.7% were stage 1-2 periodontitis patients. There was a statistically significant relationship between PC and visited the dentist, PC and dental flossing, PC and gender (p<0.05). Periodontitis were more common among male. While the most common systemic disease was hypertension in gingivitis and the stage 1-2 periodontitis patients, most of the stage 3-4 periodontitis patients (85.7%) were systemically healthy. Within the limits of this study, it was seen that periodontal disease is a public health problem. Therefore, more epidemiological studies are needed in the future.

Özet

Çalışmamızın amacı Periodontoloji Kliniğine başvuran hastaların demografik verilerini, periodontal durumlarını (PD), çeşitli risk faktörlerini belirlemek ve PD’nin bu faktörler ile ilişkisini değerlendirmektir. Bu çalışmaya 2016-2018 tarihleri arasında Periodontoloji Kliniğine başvuran 1758 hasta (941 kadın / 817 erkek) dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastalar; demografik bilgiler (yaş, cinsiyet, eğitim durumu), PD, sistemik hastalık, diş fırçalama sıklığı, diş ipi kullanımı, diş hekimi ziyaret sıklığı ve sigara kullanımı açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen tüm veriler SPSS programıyla (ver.20) analiz edilmiştir. Hastaların %28.2’si sağlıklı (sağlıklı ve azalmış periodonsiyumda klinik gingival sağlık), %46.4’ü gingivitis, %22.6’sı evre 1-2 ve %2.8’si evre 3-4 periodontitis olarak tespit edilmiştir. Katılımcıların %33.9’u hiç diş hekimini ziyaret etmemiştir. Katılımcıların çoğu (%91,2) diş ipi kullanmazken, günde 2 kez dişlerini fırçalayanların oranı %71.7 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Sigara kullananların %48’i gingivitis hastası iken %26.7’si evre 1-2 periodontitis hastası olarak belirlenmiştir. PD ile diş hekimine gitme sıklığı, PD ile diş ipi kullanım ve PD ile cinsiyet arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Periodontitisin erkekler arasında daha yaygın olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Gingivitis ve evre 1-2 periodontitis hastalarında en çok görülen sistemik hastalık hipertansiyon iken evre 3-4 periodontitis hastalarının çoğunun (%85.7) sistemik olarak sağlıklı olduğu görülmüştür. Bu çalışmanın sınırları dahilinde periodontal hastalığın bir halk sağlığı sorunu olduğu görülmüştür. Bu nedenle gelecekte daha çok epidemiyolojik çalışmaya ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINDAL, D., AYDINYURT, H. Ş., ESKİN, K., ALKHATİB, M., YALÇIN, D. K. (2022). Evaluation of the Relationship Existing Periodontal Condition With Risk Factors of the Patients Visiting Periodontology Clinic. Van Diş Hekimliği Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 1–11. https://ajindex.com/articles/978538

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Del Pinto R, Pietropaoli D, Munoz-Aguilera E, D’Aiuto F, Czesnikiewicz-Guzik M, Monaco A, et al. Periodontitis and Hypertension: Is the Association Causal? High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2020;27(4):281- 9
  2. Sanz M, Marco del Castillo A, Jepsen S, Gonzalez‐Juanatey JR, D’Aiuto F, Bouchard P, et al. Periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases: Consensus report. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(3):268-88
  3. Gasner NS, Schure RS. Periodontal Disease. Içinde: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [a.yer 30 Mayıs 2021]. Erişim adresi: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK5545 90/ 4. Monsarrat P, Blaizot A, Kémoun P, Ravaud P, Nabet C, Sixou M, et al. Clinical research activity in periodontal medicine: a systematic mapping of trial registers. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(5):390-400
  4. Tonetti MS, D’Aiuto F, Nibali L, Donald A, Storry C, Parkar M, et al. Treatment of Periodontitis and Endothelial Function. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(9):911-20
  5. Sälzer S, Graetz C, Dörfer CE, Slot DE, Van der Weijden FA. Contemporary practices for mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal disease. Scannapieco FA, editör. Periodontol 2000. 2020;84(1):35-44
  6. Xiao L, Karapen K, Dong S, Yang H, Zhang X. Epidemiology of periodontal disease in adolescents in mainland China, 1983–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(1):45-60
  7. Armitage GC. Development of a Classification System for Periodontal Diseases and Conditions. Ann Periodontol. 1999;4(1):1- 6
  8. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, Bartold PM, Dommisch H, Eickholz P, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89:S74-84
  9. Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, Dietrich T, Feres M, Fine DH, et al. Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions: Classification and case definitions for periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2018;89:S173-82
  10. Janakiram C, Dye BA. A public health approach for prevention of periodontal disease. Periodontol 2000. 2020;84(1):202-14
  11. Marcenes W, Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Flaxman A, Naghavi M, Lopez A, et al. Global Burden of Oral Conditions in 1990-2010: A Systematic Analysis. J Dent Res. 2013;92(7):592-7
  12. Dye BA.