Journals / International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Non-parametric analysis of maintenance data for Attitude Indicator of a commercial aircraft fleet

Pages
103–108
Publication Date
2023-08-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sampling uncertainty of the estimates is quantified by normal approximation confidence intervals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Analysis of maintenance data for a repairable system provides information about the failure behavior of the system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Such information is needed for determining preventive maintenance and retirement policy for the system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sampling uncertainty of the estimates is quantified by normal approximation confidence intervals.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aircraft · Mean cumulative function · Multiple repairable systems

Abstract

Analysis of maintenance data for a repairable system provides information about the failure behavior of the system. Such information is needed for determining preventive maintenance and retirement policy for the system. Parametric and non-parametric models can be used for analysis. Parametric models require more assumptions about the failure process of the systems under consideration compared to non-parametric models. To verify these assumptions statistical expertise needed. The purpose of this paper is to show that in practice non-parametric estimator of mean cumulative function can be utilized easily to model the failure behavior of a fleet. Mean cumulative function estimates the mean number of failures as function of operating hours. The method is exemplified on the attitude indicator units of a commercial aircraft fleet. Sampling uncertainty of the estimates is quantified by normal approximation confidence intervals.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUSOY, S. K., ŞAŞMAZTÜRK, M. S. (2023). Non-parametric analysis of maintenance data for Attitude Indicator of a commercial aircraft fleet. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 103–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/971836

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Cha, J.H. and M. Finkelstein, Point Processes for Reliability Analysis: Shocks and Repairable Systems, in Point Processes for Reliability Analysis: Shocks and Repairable Systems. 2018, Springer: New York. p. 1-419
  2. Lawless, J., Statistical methods in reliability. Technometrics, 1983. 25(4): p. 305-316
  3. Nelson, W., Graphical analysis of system repair data. Journal of Quality Technology, 1988. 20(1): p. 24-35
  4. Trindade, D. and S. Nathan. Simple plots for monitoring the field reliability of repairable systems. in Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2005. Proceedings. 2005. IEEE
  5. Block, J., et al., Fleet-level reliability analysis of repairable units: a non-parametric approach using the mean cumulative function. International Journal of Pedagogy, Innovation and New Technologies, 2013. 9(3): p. 333-344
  6. Trindade, D. and S. Nathan, Analysis of repairable systems with severe left censoring or truncation. Quality Engineering, 2018. 30(2): p. 329-338
  7. Rausand, M. and A. Høyland, System reliability theory: models, statistical methods, and applications. Vol. 396. 2003: John Wiley & Sons
  8. Cook, R.J. and J.F. Lawless, The statistical analysis of recurrent events. 2007: Springer
  9. Ascher, H. and H. Feingold, Repairable systems reliability: modeling, inference, misconceptions and their causes. 1984: M. Dekker New York
  10. Garmabaki, A., et al., A reliability decision framework for multiple repairable units. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016. 150: p. 78-88
  11. Kvaløy, J.T. and B.H. Lindqvist, TTT-based tests for trend in repairable systems data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1998. 60(1): p. 13-28
  12. Rigdon, S.E. and A.P. Basu, Statistical methods for the reliability of repairable systems. 2000: Wiley New York
  13. Kvaløy, J.T. and B.H. Lindqvist, A class of tests for renewal process versus monotonic and nonmonotonic trend in repairable systems data, in Mathematical and Statistical Methods in Reliability. 2003, World Scientific. p. 401-414
  14. Viertävä, J. and J.K. Vaurio, Testing statistical significance of trends in learning, ageing and safety indicators. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009. 94(6): p. 1128-1132
  15. Shen, L., B. Cassottana, and L.C. Tang, Statistical trend tests for resilience of power systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2018. 177: p. 138-147
  16. Kvaløy, J.T. and B.H. Lindqvist, A class of tests for trend in time censored recurrent event data. Technometrics, 2020